Jobs ALWAYS chooses his words very carefully, so that they appear to mean more than they do. Where did he explicitly state he wasn't dying? He didn't.
I hate to break it to you, but we are all dying.
But feel free to continue your deathwatch.
Jobs ALWAYS chooses his words very carefully, so that they appear to mean more than they do. Where did he explicitly state he wasn't dying? He didn't.
As is my usual wont to cut through the BS, here is my take on the "news":
If Mr. Jobs actually had a "mysterious" unnamed never-before-seen or heard of hormone imbalance that causes severe weightloss, you can bet your life it would have been patented, bottled, highly publicized, already on the market, and the man would have ended up making more money in a year than he made at his entire tenure with Apple. 85% of the planet needs to lose weight; Apple could only dream of attaining a tenth of that potential market.
What a bunch of unmitigated highly corporate crap. This is the kind of BS you expect of a Michael Jackson, not of a Steve Jobs.
It is a shame that obfuscation of the ravages of pancreatic cancer due to years of chainsmoking cigarettes and possibly other plants is necessary for "business as usual," and couldn't be used to perhaps, just maybe, convince one idiot in the world to quit friggin' smoking.
If someone had done the same for Jobs a decade or so ago, he AND Apple wouldn't be in this condition in the first place.
Unless, of course, you think the CIA injected him with a bioweapon because he resisted putting backdoor access into Mac OS. But then you'd have to ask yourself why would the CIA not market and highly profit from a drug that would earn them more legitimately than all the illegal drug running they've done since their very inception.
No, the only conspiracy here is to defraud Apple stockholders, cover Apple's corporate asses, and in doing so avoid saving lives.
Apple, The Myth: It's OVER.
![]()
xbjllb YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED!
And banned from this forum![]()
As is my usual wont to cut through the BS, here is my take on the "news":
If Mr. Jobs actually had a "mysterious" unnamed never-before-seen or heard of hormone imbalance that causes severe weightloss, you can bet your life it would have been patented, bottled, highly publicized, already on the market, and the man would have ended up making more money in a year than he made at his entire tenure with Apple. 85% of the planet needs to lose weight; Apple could only dream of attaining a tenth of that potential market.
What a bunch of unmitigated highly corporate crap. This is the kind of BS you expect of a Michael Jackson, not of a Steve Jobs.
It is a shame that obfuscation of the ravages of pancreatic cancer due to years of chainsmoking cigarettes and possibly other plants is necessary for "business as usual," and couldn't be used to perhaps, just maybe, convince one idiot in the world to quit friggin' smoking.
If someone had done the same for Jobs a decade or so ago, he AND Apple wouldn't be in this condition in the first place.
Unless, of course, you think the CIA injected him with a bioweapon because he resisted putting backdoor access into Mac OS. But then you'd have to ask yourself why would the CIA not market and highly profit from a drug that would earn them more legitimately than all the illegal drug running they've done since their very inception.
No, the only conspiracy here is to defraud Apple stockholders, cover Apple's corporate asses, and in doing so avoid saving lives.
Apple, The Myth: It's OVER.
![]()
Speaking of recovery...
If the explanation is so innocent, why isn't he keynoting? Maybe it's implicit that his health isn't the best and that having Schiller do the keynote is a continuation of him giving up more and more control as time goes on, not because of acute illness but because of a general knowledge that he seems to have a propensity toward illness at this stage of his life.
A persons health care is a private issue, no doubt. However when the person runs a multi-billion dollar publicly traded company it is inappropriate and ILLEGAL to make false statements that could impact stock price, and that included implying a health issue isn't significant when it is now crystal clear it is.
I hate to break it to you, but we are all dying.I don't think Steve Jobs has ever laid claim to immortality.
I don't care if he's constipated or has a cold, but when the iconic CEO of a major technology company is mysteriously losing weight after cancer, then "it took a year for my doctors to discover this" does NOT cut it.
I will further comment that I find it stretching the limits of credulity to believe that a man of his wealth could not find a doctor in the last year to diagnose what apparently is a "hormone problem." Any univeristy level endocrinologist is well familiar with these types of issues. I'm not buying it unless he specifically was avoiding recommended care and testing, which wouldn't suprise me given how he handled the initial diagnosis. In that case, again we shareholders have a right to know.
If the explanation is so innocent, why isn't he keynoting? Maybe it's implicit that his health isn't the best and that having Schiller do the keynote is a continuation of him giving up more and more control as time goes on, not because of acute illness but because of a general knowledge that he seems to have a propensity toward illness at this stage of his life.
As is my usual wont to cut through the BS, here is my take on the "news":
If Mr. Jobs actually had a "mysterious" unnamed never-before-seen or heard of hormone imbalance that causes severe weightloss, you can bet your life it would have been patented, bottled, highly publicized, already on the market, and the man would have ended up making more money in a year than he made at his entire tenure with Apple. 85% of the planet needs to lose weight; Apple could only dream of attaining a tenth of that potential market.
What a bunch of unmitigated highly corporate crap. This is the kind of BS you expect of a Michael Jackson, not of a Steve Jobs.
It is a shame that obfuscation of the ravages of pancreatic cancer due to years of chainsmoking cigarettes and possibly other plants is necessary for "business as usual," and couldn't be used to perhaps, just maybe, convince one idiot in the world to quit friggin' smoking.
If someone had done the same for Jobs a decade or so ago, he AND Apple wouldn't be in this condition in the first place.
Unless, of course, you think the CIA injected him with a bioweapon because he resisted putting backdoor access into Mac OS. But then you'd have to ask yourself why would the CIA not market and highly profit from a drug that would earn them more legitimately than all the illegal drug running they've done since their very inception.
No, the only conspiracy here is to defraud Apple stockholders, cover Apple's corporate asses, and in doing so avoid saving lives.
Apple, The Myth: It's OVER.
![]()
I've decided to share something very personal with the Apple community so that we can all relax and enjoy the show tomorrow.
Well said.if you're trying to find some sort of hidden meaning behind this letter because you are afraid of losing money or because you want to keep getting your fancy gadgets - i'm sorry, but that is deplorable.
If the explanation is so innocent, why isn't he keynoting? Maybe it's implicit that his health isn't the best and that having Schiller do the keynote is a continuation of him giving up more and more control as time goes on, not because of acute illness but because of a general knowledge that he seems to have a propensity toward illness at this stage of his life.
What I pointed out is, that he didn't said he wasn't.