You speculated off a false assumption, that the discovery was made today. There is no evidence of that and tons of evidence that the opposite was true. When you start from a false premise your arguments become more and more shankey
I am speculating based on a logical progression based on what we know and the most recent assumptions made by bigger names like Gizmodo.
People have been murmuring things on message boards for years - Apple considers them to be nothing more than irrelevant back chatter. Our idle speculation regardless of the approach of an announcement planned weeks ago. The problem is that they are getting to the point from people like Gizmodo who are promoting Job's immanent death. There really never was any comment made because it was not needed - any planned keynote that Apple was participating in as already going to be done by Jobs. These rumors are nothing more. The worse was the heart attack story that was quickly (within hours) debunked.
With MacWorld not being hosted by Jobs, there were questions - Jobs' open letter makes clear references to the likes of Gizmodo that he has to stop since he plans on being with his family. Now we know from the past that Apple's stock goes down during Macworld due to the unmet expectations that happen. Apple is going to do what it can to end any lingering rumors before a big trade show. Jobs not being there is no secret - it was made public over 2 weeks ago!
Now tell me this, what do you think is more likely - That a diagnosis was made weeks ago right about the time Jobs decided not to do the Keynote (when he wants to spend time with his wife and family for once in 11 years) - these things are prepared weeks in advanced - and that Jobs (in typical fashion consistent with his bout with Cancer - the board was aware of it), knowing that this does not affect his role as CEO (something the board publicly agreed with - and they aint lying when they state confidence) never talked about it. ORRRR.... That a discovery was made just this morning and Jobs made an uncharacteristic press announcement that.... He will still be CEO for a long while and the Board agrees saying that we will announce it if his health becomes a factor.
What evidence do you have that the discovery was made today as you assert>
I don't know when the man was diagnosed. All I know is I logged on to macrumors and I see this letter that was put out the day before the keynote, saying Jobs is good to go.
I see what you are trying to do, and when people are trying to prove a point, they mix and match so that it all comes together into one idea. Yeah, there is what I think happened, but the one true fact is that Jobs has been rumored to die for a while, and news stations even ran the story, not just some goofy blog like Gizmodo.
The fact that you agree that apple had to say something, now, amplifies my question of why. Did they release this farce to protect the stocks on the eve of a keynote? If he got diagnosed a long time ago, why wait, and drop a simultaneous note with the big board guys?
Sometimes you don't have to look very deep into stuff to call bullsh$%.
All we know is what Jobs tells us. We also know that people have been saying things about his death for ages. Great timing by his doctors, the board, and himself to get this message out before the keynote.
For all ANYONE knows, jobs didn't even right the letter. Using that logical progression mumbo-jumbo you brought to the table, I am sure you can agree with that statement.