You forgot the 2560 x 1440 resolution.
That I did, but hey, its a cheap monitor.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824185011
You forgot the 2560 x 1440 resolution.
I'm loving the flames.
Define "similar to the iMac screen", please.
Use proper terminology, please.
Nope it's not a bad brand. Too bad your cheap monitor is a TN panel unlike the iMac which has an IPS panel.
Again, try comparing monitors similar to the imac screen.
Here:
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/...ynoteSearch&baynote_bnrank=5&baynote_irrank=0
Now shut up please
Size, resolution, screen type, build, etc.
Shall i go on?
He'll be dead within the year. And you know what? He deserves it.
Why are you being so picky?
In general use, resolution doesn't really matter. 1920 x 1080 will do just fine when sending mail, reading news, watching videos, etc. I know you Mac fanboys like to wave your e-peen around, but that doesn't mean the general population likes to spend that much money for detail they'll probably never use to it's full potential.
Why are you being so picky?
Please. Humble me with your intelligence.
Well Mr. Jobs, you did a great job leading Apple into the 21st century. (biggest comeback in corporate history)
No, I did not, as I already have a 24 inch that costed me $300, but now I feel ripped off because of this...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...onitors+-+LCD+Flat+Panel-_-SAMSUNG-_-24001431
But even then, it would only be $1100, which is STILL $900 less than that pretty iMac.
I forgot to add that I splurged on the case a little, and since it has a goofy form factor the prettiness of the case would probably cost you in the long run.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811163177
I'm also laughing at the mindless downrating of this comment because it is something that isn't praise for an Apple product.
Not innovative at all.
Ever heard of Darwin BSD? Probably not. It's what Apple stole and based your OS off of. You want to know a close relative of BSD in general? Linux.
Take a wild guess how many app stores Linux has.
3+, last time I checked. The were doing that stuff years ago. There is NOTHING innovative about Apple. It's just that nobody catches them because they steal their ideas from obscure stuff.
But people are trying to point out that they can build a better computer with the SAME specs as the imac for cheaper.
If you don't know what you're talking about, and you don't want it, then don't buy it.
Why are you being so picky?
In general use, resolution doesn't really matter. 1920 x 1080 will do just fine when sending mail, reading news, watching videos, etc. I know you Mac fanboys like to wave your e-peen around, but that doesn't mean the general population likes to spend that much money for detail they'll probably never use to it's full potential.
So much contradiction.
Better with the same specs? On what planet does that make sense?
Also, like I already stated, most people wouldn't care to go out and blow $500 more on a monitor than they need to. It won't directly affect their computing experience. I'm talking GPU, memory, etc.
Well I obviously need to be educated then.
Stole? Sorry, the BSD license allows anyone to use it anyway they want which is why there is OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, ...
I also suggest you understand the definition of "innovate" which based on your post you don't.
Just a little help in case you don't want to click on the link...
"...innovation generally refers to the creation of better or more effective products, processes, technologies, or ideas that are accepted by markets, governments, and society."
Yea... they innovate.