Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
*yawn*

Consumers don't seem to care, apparently. Mac sales are through the roof every quarter.

The whole blu-ray question is moot.
 
Movies are just files.

Owning the file on an optical disk is less convenient for me than owning a file on a hard drive.

C.

I myself think of my CD & Movie collection as that, a collection. It's kind of hard to display files on a shelf.

As a graphic designer, I like having the packaging artwork that the discs come in and actually the discs are part of that artwork. Yeah you have "digital booklets", but it's not the same.

This is always a hard thing for me to "sell" to other people who have only grown up with digital music & movies. I don't know how old you are, but most younger people don't really care about packaging. I'm not trying to put those people down, because all they've known is files on an mp3 player.

I just don't like that music and movies have been heading the way that they have been. Fortunately vinyl is making a comeback. I just hope it lasts and I wish it would carry over into CDs and DVDs. I know I sound like an old geezer, but I'm only 29.
 
Some things never change

Steve is right, it is an unbelievable "bag of hurt" for Apple fans... and that is the way I'm sure he wants it ... through his petty denial.

Surprisingly, according to my welcome box, I last logged onto this site Apr 9 2006 having gone over to "the dark side" by just buying a PC... so do you guys really need to bother waisting your time hating me! ... just watch, hey!

I cannot believe all the hand-wringing and anguish (and the waste of everyones time on here discussing what is such an absolute NON issue in PC land. Steve has done this to everyone here. I have a BD and DVD drive (no big deal!) and can't believe the Apple Mac doesn't.


The time wasted here reminds me of the useless time people spent debating the Megahertz Myth and the G5/Intel augument. Its all BS, a waste of life, and why I dumped Apple.
 
I agree that digital downloads will eventually be the standard way of attaining films. However, four crucial things need to fall into place for me to even consider replacing my blu ray collection with digital downloads. By my calculation, the likelihood of these four progressions actually occurring is comparable to George Lucas deciding not to include computer generated imagery in his next feature film.

1) Digital download audio and video quality need to be comparable, if not equal, to blu ray specs. I was willing to budge on quality in terms of shifting from compact discs to digital downloads regarding the music consumption revolution. This is not the case with obtaining and viewing films. Basically, at the end of the day, I LIKE watching movies in 1080p with lossless audio, and yes I can notice the difference (something I couldn't do when comparing iTunes Plus to CD). This difference is especially noticeable on my 50" LED LCD with 7.1 Amp. In my estimation, it is going to be at least a full ten years before movies are able to be downloaded or streamed in 1080p quality at a reasonable speed. During the DECADE that people are waiting and salivating over Steve's vision, I will be watching Michael Jackson's This Is It on blu ray, having my chest pounded with the crisp LOSSLESS bass of Billie Jean.

2) Special features need to be offered alongside the films. Even if 1080p, lossless audio movies become available for download or streaming in the future, there is just something awesome about having supplementary material all stored in one location. Lord of the Rings Extended Edition DVD's are a prime example of this. They are an absolute pleasure to watch and a great encyclopaedia of the effort that went into creating those epic films. I would say the special features produced for those movies are as rewarding, if not more rewarding than the actual films. Until this sort of stuff is offered in conjunction with movies as digital downloads, blu rays own. Hands down.

3) Closed captioning. Bazillions of people all over the world need closed captioning. Some have hearing impairments, some speak a language other than english. Basically what Steve Jobs is failing to see is that his iTunes library is a pile of steaming crap, when taking into consideration current subtitle offerings on blu ray. It's actually offensive to me to think that he really believes iTunes movies suit everyone! On iTunes, subs are available if you're lucky, on a very very small amount of titles in the store. Hardly helps me and my Chinese gf to watch a film together. Did I mention blu rays come with an abundance of subtitle options? I'm talking like 20 different languages on some films!

4) 3D, BABY! We are about to hit another film revolution. All started by the stereoscopic brilliance of Avatar. Decent quality and reasonable priced 3D TV's are just about to hit the market. Do you think 3D movies are going to be available on iTunes to download? I don't think so. You know why? Because nobody wants to buy JUST a 3D movie. People want both 3D and 2D options in one package. This is possible with Blu Ray discs, and completely not possible with iTunes in its current user interface.

Steve has really pissed me off with his comments regarding blu ray. I really believe in the format for the above reasons. In the other cases in Apple history where he has pushed for a replacement of old tech with newer tech (floppy drive), there has been an adequate payoff and good reason for replacement (usb). In the case of digital downloads, there really is no payoff other than ease of accessibility, and even then, very few people around the world have uncapped download limits to justify only getting their film content via download! Steve is clearly wrong in this matter and it frustrates me to no end. Lucky I have a PS3.

Couldnt have said it better myself!

Digital Downloads are not a viable option fro everyone and BluRay offers a great viewing experience. BluRays are coming down in price already and wit the extortionate prices of DD then its Steve Jobs who needs to to embrace it and the future. Not everyone has access to the very high Broadband speeds that require DD to be successful.
 
*yawn*
Consumers don't seem to care, apparently. Mac sales are through the roof every quarter.
The whole blu-ray question is moot.

Well, I think there is a lot of Pro Users that actually do care a lot .. apparently Apple doesn't care much about them unfortunately ..

Besides, adding choice wouldn't hurt anyways, most people I know that are interested in HD movies, don't care for iTunes anyways .. so I guess the "lost sales" from them will be negligible.

T.
 
Steve needs to get out of his little bubble in Cupertino and go see the rest of America. You know, the parts of America where people are still stuck on dial up and can't download movies even if they wanted to.

Steve is just making himself look like a selfish prick with this decision.
 
That's because DVD players don't need to be given new instruction sets for newer DVDs. BRDs are different in that respect. Newer discs may have been authored with updated codecs that not all BDs have in their software.

As a developer, I understand that. As a consumer, I don't care. I can stick Wall-E in my drive and watch it, but I can't with District 9? They're both movies. Moving pictures and sound. Pick a codec standard and stick with it. Broken.
 
So from what I understand, this is the situation with Blu-ray on Mac:

1. You can purchase a BR reader/writer for data storage on a mac
2. You can write BR discs for playback in BR players using software like toast
3. You just can't watch the blu-ray movie on your mac

How do we get around #3? That is the issue. Forget about Jobs and who is right or wrong on this. Look at the technical issues and think of solutions.

If what I read is correct, then the issue is that Mac OS doesn't have the "codec" to do so. Someone above commented that Linux doesn't either and that the problem is that it is proprietary. Let's for a moment drop the debate on whether Apple should pay for its use or not, or the itunes vs. blu ray debate. What can be done for those who want blu-ray to be part of their mac for entertainment purposes?

I'd suggest what is needed is a blu-ray player that is controllable by a mac by firewire sort of the way a camcorder can be controlled through the imovie interface.

We need a blu-ray reader/writer that can do items 1 and 2 above as current burners can. It also needs to be controllable by a mac for playback. The codec is in the player itself. The mac just operates it and gets the video like it would from a elgato TV device. It should also operate as a stand alone player and finally it should be stylish since it is part of the entertainment system.

This solution is for large imacs, or macs connected to large HD TV's. It wouldn't be as useful for laptops on the go unless you want to carry the drive. But then again, smaller screens are fine. I'm thinking of the person who wants the mac controlling their entertainment system.
 
I'm starting to get fed up with Apple's attitude. What's the harm in adding support for a well established format? There is no reason against it.

Screw you Apple I'm moving to Android and Windows. Not willing to be apart of your dictatorship of technology any longer.
 
Steve is right, it is an unbelievable "bag of hurt" for Apple fans... and that is the way I'm sure he wants it ... through his petty denial.

Surprisingly, according to my welcome box, I last logged onto this site Apr 9 2006 having gone over to "the dark side" by just buying a PC... so do you guys really need to bother waisting your time hating me! ... just watch, hey!

I cannot believe all the hand-wringing and anguish (and the waste of everyones time on here discussing what is such an absolute NON issue in PC land. Steve has done this to everyone here. I have a BD and DVD drive (no big deal!) and can't believe the Apple Mac doesn't.


The time wasted here reminds me of the useless time people spent debating the Megahertz Myth and the G5/Intel augument. Its all BS, a waste of life, and why I dumped Apple.

True to a certain extent...

But our OS is better than yours :p

Seriously though - Steve managed to push me away from iDevices thanks to his arrogance and control freakness... Android here I come (soon) !!!

But I am not going back to Windows - even with overpriced mid range hardware and lack of BlueRay it is still worth it compared to WinPC hell... >_<
 
I get using Blu Ray for backups and why everyone is so upset. For me, I will continue to use my blu ray player (and/or my ps3) to watch the HD movies. I do have my mac mini hooked up to my tv for my digital content but as long as there are players out there, I am happy.
 
You can call Steve stupid and greedy, but last time I checked he just paraded Apple's market cap over Microsoft's (while taking no salary OR bonuses). He must be doing something right.

He's doing a lot of things right, but not all of them.
Apple and movies/TV hasn't worked out so far, and I doubt that it ever will with their current strategy. They'll have to buy their way into the business since no one wants to give up their profits in favour of Steve, which is the only way Apple does cooperations..
 
As the owner of a front projection home theater system and several large screen TVs, I'm here to tell you that 720p just doesn't cut it at screen sizes greater than 50". That being said, I don't need my Mac to play BDs. However, since BD is the only realistically available medium for 1080p high def video, I rent/buy most movies on BD...there's no way around that in the near term. It sure would be nice to be able to use my Mac natively to rip the BDs I do own for use on my portable devices. Apple evidently wants me to buy movies I already own again for use on portable devices. Fortunately, there are ways around this (RipBot264 and AnyDVD HD in Win7 through Parallels, for one), but the fact remains that for many consumers, BD will be the preferred choice until 1080p movies are reliably and consistently available for download.
 
I'm starting to get fed up with Apple's attitude. What's the harm in adding support for a well established format? There is no reason against it.

Screw you Apple I'm moving to Android and Windows. Not willing to be apart of your dictatorship of technology any longer.

I totally agree with you. What happened to the cool Apple? I miss the days when Apple was the underdog and actually cared about their customers.
 
So from what I understand, this is the situation with Blu-ray on Mac:

1. You can purchase a BR reader/writer for data storage on a mac
2. You can write BR discs for playback in BR players using software like toast
3. You just can't watch the blu-ray movie on your mac

How do we get around #3? That is the issue.

Install Make MKV, then open a disc and launch the streaming server. Open that stream in VLC and you have Blu-ray disc playback on Macs. But it requires a pretty beefy Mac. I have a quad core, but high frequency dual core may work.
 
I myself think of my CD & Movie collection as that, a collection. It's kind of hard to display files on a shelf.

As a graphic designer, I like having the packaging artwork that the discs come in and actually the discs are part of that artwork. Yeah you have "digital booklets", but it's not the same.

This is always a hard thing for me to "sell" to other people who have only grown up with digital music & movies. I don't know how old you are, but most younger people don't really care about packaging. I'm not trying to put those people down, because all they've known is files on an mp3 player.

I just don't like that music and movies have been heading the way that they have been. Fortunately vinyl is making a comeback. I just hope it lasts and I wish it would carry over into CDs and DVDs. I know I sound like an old geezer, but I'm only 29.

Congratulations. You have been nominated for the outstanding carbon footprint of the year award 2010.
 
While Steve has valid points, I think he exaggerates and underestimates respectively for the popularity of downloadable/streaming for high quality video and the footprint of blu ray. Big name movies like Avatar and The Dark Knight sold MILLIONS of copies within a week of release on blu ray. By comparison, SACD and DVD-A aren't even known as a format by most consumers. It's a law of diminishing returns. Only audiophiles can/will distinguish between 256kbps CDs and the higher quality formats. That is not the case for Blu Ray.

Meanwhile, itunes still only has 720p whereas the HD standard is 1080p. Even microsoft and sony have got around to delivering 1080p to their consoles. Storage is not to the level where people can comfortably store 1080p collections locally. This will likely continue to be the case, as maximum storage capacities increase, so will the media movies are stored on so as to make it impractical to store collections of 10 to 100s of movies on a disk or SSD, as it may be.

Very right. And then there's people like me who like to watch movies in their original language with optional Subtitles. This language preference thing is something which gets underestimated big time by many american companies in many fields. The movies that get sold on iTunes in germany are sometimes available in "original" language as well. Turns out that this means that instead of german you get english. Always. Even for films that are originally french…

For me for example, it's great to be able to watch a japanese movie or TV show with optional subtitles as to help me learn the language. When i taught myself english back in the VHS days I bought films on VHS from Britain just to be able to have the english version. I knew most of the movies from german TV so I knew what it was about. Great way to learn a language. But alas, no hope for the interested people in this brave new media world it seems.
 
Don't care. Don't buy Blu-Ray. Just stick to online movies even in iTunes, good enough, and easy + cheaper:cool:

Sure - so why not:

Don't care. Don't buy Mac. Just stick to to Windows, good enough, and easy + cheaper

Don't care. Don't buy iPhone. Just stick to Android, good enough, and easy + cheaper

:rolleyes:

History has shown that Apple users want the very best and are willing to pay for it, I don't understand why Apple reverses their philosophy pertaining to Blu-Ray. I'm not a big Blu-Ray person myself and the only Blu-Ray player I own is my PS3 and just have a handful of discs, but still there are many videophiles out there that want a Blu-Ray option for their Macs. Why not at least give them the option if they are willing to pay for it?
 
Install Make MKV, then open a disc and launch the streaming server. Open that stream in VLC and you have Blu-ray disc playback on Macs. But it requires a pretty beefy Mac. I have a quad core, but high frequency dual core may work.

No. There are no menus.

I'm not watching any Blu Ray until there is proper software for the Mac. My burner is waiting unused.
 
I agree - streaming or downloading is the future, but...

There's one problem: more often than not, the movie is not available in HD on iTunes when the movie is released. For example, The Crazies just came out this past Tuesday in the US, and you can only purchase the standard def version on iTunes. I want to be able to rent or purchase the 720p version the same day it is available for purchase in stores. And I don't care if it's the movie studio's fault - which it is. The fact is, it's a road block in digital distribution. Greedy hollywood is holding on to dear life to DVD and BD sales, and are not fully embracing digital distribution. In my example, MAYBE a month from now The Crazies will be available for purchase. Maybe it MIGHT even be available for rental in HD. But it's a crap shoot. It probably won't be - the standard def might be the only thing that remains available.

Apple needs to work with the movie studios to broaden the availability of HD titles, and also work with them to make them available in a timely manner.
 
Congratulations. You have been nominated for the outstanding carbon footprint of the year award 2010.

I'm so honored :)

On a serious note, I could care less about "carbon footprinting". So what, I enjoy collecting CD's & Movies.

I hate all of this "go green" crap. Yes, I try to do what I can to help the environment. I recycle. I try to use the least amount of energy that I can, but I'm not going to stop living my life just to save a few "carbon footprints"
 
blu-ray

BR movies are awesome, but they haven't caught on for everyone because not only do you need a BR player (which are much cheaper now) you need a TV that can play 1080p. This package is much more expensive than just having your regular computer and downloading/streaming a movie off of iTunes/Hulu/Netflix, etc.

I personally love watching BR movies as there is nothing else that can match the quality.

Netflix has started offering BR and that is one of the best options out there.

Jobs has a point though and in the next 5-10 years, most physical media will probably be obsolete.
 
well...

Don't care. Don't buy Blu-Ray. Just stick to online movies even in iTunes, good enough, and easy + cheaper:cool:

To each his own I suppose. I buy on average about 8 BluRay movies a month, I have a $7000 projector and a room for screening movies I can say without any doubt that there is no comparison at all between iTunes "HD" movies and blurays. Bluray, quality, picture and sound wise are unrivalled except in the movie cinema. I hope Bluray is around for a long time. Bluray on the Mac? Well, I wish, but besides the 5 macs I have at my studio, I also have 3 PC's which have Bluray and using Encore is almost as good as DVDSP...my 3 cents...:eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.