Furthermore, on a cold dark night, a mere six feet away from that glowing 65", no one satisfies like she can.
Don't take this the wrong way, but you do sound like a bit of an enthusiast.
C.
Furthermore, on a cold dark night, a mere six feet away from that glowing 65", no one satisfies like she can.
Ironically, "obsolete" media sometimes provides the highest quality. There is a big underground for ripping vinyl in 96kHz and 24-bit FLACs. And combined with modern click/pop removal, it is phenomenal sounding, way better than anything you can download on iTunes.
The only advantage I can see to vinyl rips is not damaging the vinyl anymore.
Don't take this the wrong way, but you do sound like a bit of an enthusiast.
C.
Better to buy a laser turntable.
When I bring clients over and show them my work, you don't think it results in greater sales?
Sounds fascinating, thanks! But is the output digital, or analog?
Are you saying you would show your work in BluRay?
If quality is that big a deal, why not show them the ProRes422 master?
C.
Line output (standard) or phono output (request)
Because my clients are just as used to dealing with round plastic discs that go easily into consumer players as consumers.
Ease. And because no end user is going to see the ProRes422 master. And distributors, sellers, and resellers want to experience the end product.
And for the same reason no one ever got a record deal by hauling a record company executive into the best studio in the world to experience a live 48 track mixdown. Even though the results would have been technically superior and spectacular to the end result.
![]()
I agree that Apple's main focus is like every other corporation and that is generating wealth --- Steve himself has said that downloads are great and everyone loves the quality so what is he afraid of? Give the consumer a choice and in the end you might sell a few more computers.
Thanks. I think I'll get one. More money out of Steve Job's pocket, in this case, $7000- $12000 depending on the model I pick.
Fair enough.
Any particular reason you don't buy one of these?
http://store.apple.com/uk/product/H1394ZM/A?
mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY
C.
Because my clients are just as used to dealing with round plastic discs that go easily into consumer players as consumers.
nobody cares about some tiny $12,000 sale, changing the world is far more important.
yawn, your customer base is living in the past, nobody uses CDs anymore, those died out over 7 years ago... you're stuck in the past, with an obsolete media format... just stream, download or torrent that info, it's much more flexible.
but Steve has never cared about money don't forget, so what is your point?
nobody cares about some tiny $12,000 sale, changing the world is far more important.
yawn, your customer base is living in the past, nobody uses CDs anymore, those died out over 7 years ago... you're stuck in the past, with an obsolete media format... just stream, download or torrent that info, it's much more flexible.
and what consumer still uses cd players? that's a complete laugh!![]()
Not to mention you can't PROOF the darned things in Mac OS. That's ridiculous.
yawn, your customer base is living in the past, nobody uses CDs anymore, those died out over 7 years ago... you're stuck in the past, with an obsolete media format... just stream, download or torrent that info, it's much more flexible.
and what consumer still uses cd players? that's a complete laugh!![]()
Why is adding Blu Ray 'cheapening'. People into Blu Ray are not laggards. They will get 4K discs while the downloaders are still at 2K. Then they will get 8K media while the downloaders are still behind.
Downloaders are the laggards.
Of course people still buy a lot of CDs. It's better quality and cheaper than any legal downloads.
Where do you live so I can send an EMP your way and wipe out all your lovely data.![]()
I can see why you find that annoying, but I would always advise against testing media on the machine that created it.
Are there not alternatives to Encore?
C.