I voted this as positive. You can tell by looking at him that he's not well. He needs to take some time off to recover.
I voted this as positive. You can tell by looking at him that he's not well. He needs to take some time off to recover.
I guess you don't understand the idea of which vote works based on your sympathy for him. If you vote positive in this case that means you're glad he's taking a leave and you're glad he's sick and you're glad there's negative news about him. If you vote negative in this case that means you are disappointed that he's now taken sick and you wish him a speedy recovery because Apple needs him. The positive votes in this case are from people who hate SJ. Are those your intentions?
This fear of Apple's demise has already been measured into the value of the Stock.
The Markets are well aware of Steve's limited time on Earth.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
Your answer is somehwat biased. You yourself admit to having worked for a cellphone manufacturer. Of course it's fine that you have a sense of loyalty to that company. However, you can't deny that the iPhone very much so revolutionized cellphones. We'd probably still be using somewhat lame Blackberrys with no Wifi on them.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
Your answer is somehwat biased. You yourself admit to having worked for a cellphone manufacturer. Of course it's fine that you have a sense of loyalty to that company. However, you can't deny that the iPhone very much so revolutionized cellphones. We'd probably still be using somewhat lame Blackberrys with no Wifi on them.
If Apple didn't want to suffer an unnecessary plummet in market cap, they'd share whatever good news they had.In 2008 a false rumor of SJ having a heart attack dropped AAPL 10 points. In 2011 SJ is on medical leave of absence and there is no real information about his condition. However, we can assume that due to his recent medical history the condition can be very severe. The effect on 2011? First day reaction is down 8-10% on European exchanges. Therefore, this was expected.
Let it be nothing more than just a LOA. Get well really soon, my dear Steve!!
Seriously, without you & Apple, my life would be close to meaningless and colourless.
xoxoxoooo
![]()
Markets react to events like this as follows.
People sell because they fear others are going to sell. That self-fulfilling prophecy will bring the stock down. Say, it comes down to 320.
Others who bought the stock in the past week or two will buy more. Those who sold at $340 will consider buying it back.
These two factors will play during the day on Tuesday. The stock may stablize around 330. After earnings announcement, if it is above expectations, the stock will rally to the $350 level, if it is below expectations, will tank to the 310 level.
I guess you don't understand the idea of which vote works based on your sympathy for him. If you vote positive in this case that means you're glad he's taking a leave and you're glad he's sick and you're glad there's negative news about him. If you vote negative in this case that means you are disappointed that he's now taken sick and you wish him a speedy recovery because Apple needs him. The positive votes in this case are from people who hate SJ. Are those your intentions?
A couple of things to make people less nervous:
1) We don't have to worry about Apple like it was in the past, mostly because I believe that Apple now has a firm succession plan in place with Tim Cook and Phil Schiller taking over the reigns of the company once Jobs leaves the scene.
2) As for Pixar division of Disney (which Jobs still has a lot of personal interest in), it's actually now more under the control of John Lasseter than anything else. As such, I expect Pixar to help produce more profits for Disney in the future.
If Apple didn't want to suffer an unnecessary plummet in market cap, they'd share whatever good news they had.
For this reason I fear the worse, even as I hope for a better outcome.
Peace to the man and his family.
In all honesty news are not about sympathy in general. They are about news or journalistic value. I find it bit silly even to start evaluating and rating news according to their sympathy value.
To you voting positive might mean: "[...] you're glad he's taking a leave and you're glad he's sick and you're glad there's negative news about him". To me it means that this news is important and it can have effect on Apple, their products and eventually on their customers. To me the value of the news has nothing to do with sympathy. If you honestly think that positive votes are from "[...] from people who hate SJ". Then I think you are mistaken. I think vast majority who voted positive are those who read this like a news site without emotional evolvement including without hate or prejudice.