100% of android owners* are very satisfied.
Satisfied with what? Satisfied in knowing I can just use an iPhone instead?
100% of android owners* are very satisfied.
What would the margin of error be for a random survey of 200 people from a population of 10-15 million? 5-7%?
Even if you disagree with the sample size, is it really that hard to imagine? It's an iPhone FFS.
https://www.macrumors.com/2011/09/0...rankings-of-smartphone-consumer-satisfaction/
Not a surprise. You'll get the same results with a sample size of 2000 people. How can you not? 1) It's an iPhone, 2) It's an improvement over the iPhone 4, 3) it has Siri.
Connect the dots.
MacRumors is also a skewed sampling. In fact EVERY forum is a skewed sampling. So 100 posts about bad battery life may seem like the whole world, but it's not.
Fandroids look like they are taking over the world, but surprise! they're not. They're just all on the forums blabbing away, all day long, making it much more annoying and useless to even read these comments anymore. Thanks for reading mine though!![]()
200 of say 10-15 million users is accurate enough. Consider when Gallup does a survey they typically use a sample size of 1000 to represent a country of 300 million with a ±4% margin of error. According to their data increasing the sample size beyond 1000 only has a marginal improvement in accuracy.
Did this survey really need to happen? I've yet to meet anyone dissatisfied with something brand new they were waiting over a year for and only had one option to select from. Only the truly brave are willing to try out something not iPhone when they had iPhone; if they were coming from something else (Android, feature) who is going to admit failure?
The problem here is the contracting required for these phones. You BETTER be completely satisfied, because late 2013 is a long time to be with something you hate.
----------
Please start ending your posts with /sarcasm because no rational human being could actually believe what you just wrote.
Say around 6% with an confidence level of around 90%. In survey terms that is bad. That would be with just 2 answers.
Fact that there are more here increases it it and the standard deviation would be a lot higher. The spread is to high, it bad survay.
When doing a random sample of people it requires a lot more requirements to make sure your sample is good.
People in Texas will give much different results on average than people in California. Or Big city vs small city.
200 people is not enough to even get a handle on getting those variables under control.
Hmm. You know all of the terms, but you (obviously) can't be bothered to actually do the calculations.
Given the numbers we have, you can determine the confidence interval for any given confidence level for the result given the population size and sample size.
With a population of 15,000,000, and a sample size of 200, a 96% response means:
Looks like a pretty solid survey to me.
- 95% confidence that between 93.28% and 98.72% are satisfied with their iPhone 4s
- 99% confidence that between 92.43% and 99.57% are satisfied with their iPhone 4s
Hmm. You know all of the terms, but you (obviously) can't be bothered to actually do the calculations.
Given the numbers we have, you can determine the confidence interval for any given confidence level for the result given the population size and sample size.
With a population of 15,000,000, and a sample size of 200, a 96% response means:
Looks like a pretty solid survey to me.
- 95% confidence that between 93.28% and 98.72% are satisfied with their iPhone 4s
- 99% confidence that between 92.43% and 99.57% are satisfied with their iPhone 4s
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2011/09/13/iphone-4-sales-still-strong/
Now add a faster processor + Siri.
Winner.
You don't need to be a statistician to figure this stuff out.
The rabbi was right.
LOL at America.
These people are locked into two-year contracts. Psychologically, how can someone justify being unsatisfied when they have potentially 24 months at up to $100/mo left to pay?
Ask the prepaid users in Europe (who paid 749 upfront) how satisfied they are and you won't get the same answer, you'll get a more accurate one.
Do the math.
It is a 90% that the result is with in 90%-100%. 6% error is a pretty wide margin of error.
Also that would be on a much more control sample group of say manufacturing.
Human surveying is harder to do. You have a large geographic area to cover with a range of populations and 200. This is a bad survey in how check.
It is nothing more than a spot check. Not really valid than a quick check.
used this to sit for the quick cals.
http://www.custominsight.com/articles/random-sample-calculator.asp
It has been a long time since I seen the formulas. It not really much good than say you wanted something about the same of NYC. It is worthless for the entire nation.
unlocked iPhones are sold everywhere, just as well as 2 years contracts. I don't get your point for Europe v. US.
There is an easy way to check your last point, it's the return rates.
it's the return rates.
Let me know how well an iPhone4S without a contract works on AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon or Sprint, i.e. the four large carriers in the US.
The survey is ridiculous, at best, because it can't separate the physical iP4S from the service in the US, whereas that disconnect can be made in the rest of the world.
Even if you disagree with the sample size, is it really that hard to imagine? It's an iPhone FFS.
https://www.macrumors.com/2011/09/0...rankings-of-smartphone-consumer-satisfaction/
Not a surprise. You'll get the same results with a sample size of 2000 people. How can you not? 1) It's an iPhone, 2) It's an improvement over the iPhone 4, 3) it has Siri.
Connect the dots.