Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
54,598
16,735



T-Mobile and Sprint today announced that plans for a merger have officially ended after the two companies were unable to find "mutually agreeable terms."

Rumors last week suggested the merger might be called off because Sprint parent company SoftBank was having doubts about the deal over the ownership terms. SoftBank was concerned about "losing control" of the combined company, as T-Mobile parent company Deutsche Telekom wanted a controlling stake.

sprinttmobile.jpg

The two companies allegedly attempted to save the merger by negotiating new terms after Deutsche Telekom submitted a revised offer, but an agreement was not able to be reached.

In a statement, T-Mobile CEO John Legere said that while a deal with Sprint was "compelling," it would have needed to offer "significant benefits" for both consumers and shareholders.
"The prospect of combining with Sprint has been compelling for a variety of reasons, including the potential to create significant benefits for consumers and value for shareholders. However, we have been clear all along that a deal with anyone will have to result in superior long-term value for T-Mobile's shareholders compared to our outstanding stand-alone performance and track record. Going forward, T-Mobile will continue disrupting this industry and bringing our proven Un-carrier strategy to more customers and new categories - ultimately redefining the mobile Internet as we know it. We've been out-growing this industry for the last 15 quarters, delivering outstanding value for shareholders, and driving significant change across wireless. We won't stop now."
Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure said Sprint had decided that it would be best to move forward alone. Sprint will instead aim to "compete fiercely" in the wireless industry.
"While we couldn't reach an agreement to combine our companies, we certainly recognize the benefits of scale through a potential combination. However, we have agreed that it is best to move forward on our own. We know we have significant assets, including our rich spectrum holdings, and are accelerating significant investments in our network to ensure our continued growth. As convergence in the connectivity marketplace continues, we believe significant opportunities exist to establish strong partnerships across multiple industries. We are determined to continue our efforts to change the wireless industry and compete fiercely. We look forward to continuing to take the fight to the duopoly and newly emerging competitors."
This is the second time that T-Mobile and Sprint have failed to reach a merger agreement. Sprint parent company SoftBank attempted to purchase T-Mobile back in 2013 in a deal worth more than $20 billion, but ultimately abandoned its plans in 2014 amid regulatory scrutiny.

Even had the deal succeeded this time around, it's not clear if it would have gained regulatory approval. Back in 2014, U.S. antitrust regulators said having four national carriers in the United States was important for maintaining a competitive market.

Article Link: T-Mobile and Sprint Officially Call Off Merger
 

Septembersrain

Contributor
Dec 14, 2013
4,249
5,299
Texas
I worked for Boost Mobile. Let me tell you, Sprint is sitting on such a wide mass of spectrum. They are slow at converting towers. I don't blame T-Mobile for bowing out. Sprint/SoftBank wanted more control over the merger but they can't even do right with what they've got. Unless they were going to give Deutsche Telekom full control, there was no way T-Mobile customers would have benefited here. Just my opinion.
 

vartanarsen

macrumors 6502a
Jul 2, 2010
678
266
I think i agree with most that TMO didn't lose much here....Sprint lost. Its like ugly guy tries with pretty girl...you better do what pretty girls wants...who needs whom?.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ziggo and jdillings

Smith288

macrumors 65816
Feb 26, 2008
1,156
815
TMobile will need to start making some revenue. They've been bleeding to build up subscribers.
 

ignatius345

macrumors 68040
Aug 20, 2015
3,962
5,462
Even had the deal succeeded this time around, it's not clear if it would have gained regulatory approval.Back in 2014, U.S. antitrust regulators said having four national carriers in the United States was important for maintaining a competitive market.

I don't think curbing monopoly power is quite as high on the list of priorities as it was in 2014...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.