T-mobile has always been run by crooks. When I told them I was switching to AT&T in a few months, TWICE they charged me some random $300 fee and they never told me what it was about. I called them up, yelled for a couple of minutes and they removed it. Such crooks.
The only thing about tmobile that frustrated me was my inability to walk out of a store with iphone in hand at $575 (plus other fees). The store insisted I had to finance the purchase of the phone but the web site allowed me to order the phone and pay full price for it.
"...but I thought I can just sign up and cancel to get a super cheap phone. T-mobile is so deceptive!"
It's good we have Attorneys General to protect idiots from themselves. Otherwise, the idiots would quickly die out, and brainy people would be forced to take your fries order.
You're signing up for a payment plan for the phone, not a cell phone service contract. If you don't buy a phone: no contract. How is that not obvious to anybody with a brain?
I second that.
This is stupid and unfair to T-Mobile. Finally a carrier moves towards transparency and fairness and this dingbat wants to punish them? Total BS with all the crap other carriers do on a daily basis. Is Bob so used to the traditional consumer-crushing way of doing business that anything else appears to him as unlawful by contrast? Boneheaded move.![]()
"...but I thought I can just sign up and cancel to get a super cheap phone. T-mobile is so deceptive!"
I second that.
This is stupid and unfair to T-Mobile. Finally a carrier moves towards transparency and fairness and this dingbat wants to punish them? Total BS with all the crap other carriers do on a daily basis. Is Bob so used to the traditional consumer-crushing way of doing business that anything else appears to him as unlawful by contrast? Boneheaded move.![]()
It's good we have Attorneys General to protect idiots from themselves. Otherwise, the idiots would quickly die out, and brainy people would be forced to take your fries order.
Isn't the uncarrier about the service? Not the phone?I think tmobile is right to modify their ads, this way it eliminates all confusion. You are financing the phone and they should come out and call it that.
Hey MacRumors writers, you might want to do some fact checking... The Attorney General has no authority to order anyone to do anything. You say in the article that the AG "ordered" T-Mobile to stop its deceptive advertising. NOT TRUE. It was a court order that compelled T-Mobile to do this.
Please learn something about civics, it might do you good.
You're signing up for a payment plan for the phone, not a cell phone service contract. If you don't buy a phone: no contract. How is that not obvious to anybody with a brain?
You do realize that far too many people simply don't use their brains, at least not nearly enough (unintentionally or even intentionally). That's pretty much as factual as a fact can get. Welcome to the human condition.You're signing up for a payment plan for the phone, not a cell phone service contract. If you don't buy a phone: no contract. How is that not obvious to anybody with a brain?
I'm pretty sure this was lobby money from Verizon and AT&T at work. The uncarrier campaign sure must have been hurting sales. There isn't a single person who thought you could sign up with T-Mobile and cancel the next day with a free iPhone like this AG is suggesting.
There is no contract with the wireless service. The phone isn't free. Everyone already knew that but of course this wasn't ever about "protecting the consumer" it was about protecting the big duopoly we have going on here in the U.S.
Case in point, this buffoon was no where in sight with AT&T reneging on its "unlimited" contract, blocking FaceTime for a long time, and all sorts of other real chances to protect the consumer. Of course he'll come out swinging for the AT&T lobbyists lining his pockets though.
Isn't the uncarrier about the service? Not the phone?