Yes, I do. In theory, assuming I'm an average person using an average amount of data, the net monthly cost should be about the same to me regardless of billing. The price ISPs charge today is essentially an averaging of all users. Those who use less data are in essence subsidizing the service of those who use more data.
Currently I pay $40/month for some relatively fast internet. Let's say the
average usage is 200GB/month. So the price should be $0.20/GB, right?
So if I use 100GB in a month, I would pay $20. If I use 400GB in a month, I would pay $80. It seems fair to me.
If I use less, why shouldn't I save some money? If I use more, why shouldn't I pay more?
If I decide to get a hot tub, my water bill should go up. If I decide to get a 4K TV, my internet bill should go up. If I decide to not use my dryer and instead air dry my laundry, my electricity bill should go down. If I decide to not use internet for a week and instead read a book, my internet bill should go down.
Why does my grandfather, who checks his Yahoo email and weather once per week at most,
pay the same amount as me, who streams at least two episodes of a TV show daily?
Why should some guy who hosts a basement videogame server pay the same amount as me?
[doublepost=1483654339][/doublepost]
As someone smarter than me explained above, it is in fact not true that the internet is unlimited. There are physical limits.
If anything, it is water that is pseudo-unlimited as nearly every molecule of water used is eventually returned to the ground, air, or oceans.