So if you have any battery problems they essentially have to replace the entire machine?
Yup.
It's not very green or ecologically friendly, but I'm not on their board of directors so I can't make any decisions as to how the company should do things, responsibly or otherwise.
I'm not happy with them moving everything to proprietary.
-P
Apple's execs are. And they are the ones Apple is looking out for. Not customers. Otherwise this draconian move would never have been attempted.
Well i guess no MBP retina for me then

Non removable ram and ssd sucks ass, absurd prices for memory/ssd upgrade in the online applestore
Businesses are about profit. Not helping the customer beyond a certain perception. But this is what people want, it seems.
Worse, NOTHING has been said about heating issues yet. Every MBP ever released tends to get very hot. Heating WILL reduce the lifespan of electronic components and these things are not cheap and people are not made of money.
Just wait until BYOD becomes a mandatory practice...
But given Apple is slowly shying away from desktop machines, especially the Mac Pro, and hyping up mobile devices more, this is a big issue to recognize, acknowledge, and address. I will absolutely not buy another mobile Mac unless these issues are addressed.
Or maybe the new models run at 50C while doing 3D rendering or movie editing. My 2011 gets up to 90C, my 2009 got up to 99C, and enough reviews of the 2010 models had shown well over 100C... I don't care if the CPU can run at 105C. Anyone who knows a thing about electronics WILL say you shouldn't run components that hot for a long period of time. Anyone thinking they can should go to Apple and ask why they are using expensive cooling mechanisms to keep their server farms going at cooler temperatures. (Longevity and reliability. Something they do not want for customers because that would delay potential profit. Give the impression of quality but engineer it in just the right way and people won't know the difference. And some people are geniuses at being led as well...)
Can't upgrade the RAM yourself now.
Or SSD/HDD.
But given Apple's history of marking up commodity hardware upgrades, it's not hard to fathom why Apple went this route.
Expect their next quarter's balance sheet to be glowing.
----------
I think Apple are quite keen to reduce the life-cycle of the Pro. Customers have been getting too many years out of their machines.
That wouldn't surprise me; I was floored by the real quality in my 2009 Mac Pro.
The delays in later models post-2010 were a disappointment, while noting iMacs and MacBooks continued to have reports of heating/screen yellowing/other problems, including the person I sold my 2009 iMac to... the Mac Pro was indeed an indisputably well-built product and a genuine and legitimate marvel OF design. Seriously. But the money isn't there for Apple, as only niche markets would be able to afford or want to afford such high prices...
If only the iMacs wouldn't double as toaster ovens that can make you feel warm all over in front while cooking a chicken in the back...