It's f Apple. Not a 'luxury brand'Just because you can’t afford them doesn’t mean the price needs to be lowered. This is a luxury brand of headphones. Can’t afford them, then there are brands less expensive.
It's f Apple. Not a 'luxury brand'Just because you can’t afford them doesn’t mean the price needs to be lowered. This is a luxury brand of headphones. Can’t afford them, then there are brands less expensive.
Spoken like someone who never used one or compared one to other headphones makers.They need to be lighter and $100 (at least) cheaper. Honestly. Not competitive in a market with Sony, Bose, Sennheiser, et al
I really wish Apple made Airpod Pro 2's in black. Heck. Give me Space Grey or Midnight and I'd be set.
Except for those who change from iPhone to iPad & to MacBook regularly..having to constantly go into settings to add a Bluetooth device is annoying when you’re used to such a fantastic system as the AirPods and Beats Powerbeats Pro. Those who know what I’m talking about will appreciate it. Those who don’t will just laugh because they know no better.They need to be lighter and $100 (at least) cheaper. Honestly. Not competitive in a market with Sony, Bose, Sennheiser, et al
Why? There’s a lot of things that need attention from Apple. First of course would be that awful, “why did Apple even bother to make” case. USB-C is a given at this point in the game. The only reason I can think of that Apple decided to skip USB-C on the AirPods Pro 2 is they wanted some people to double-dip next year on a new USB-C case. They can’t do that with the Max 2 hopefully. Some of the new features of the AirPods Pro 2. Finally, a weight reduction would be appreciated by those used to having something lighter on their heads during a long flight.I would be astonished to see a 2nd gen AirPods Max in the next couple of years.
Same for no on/off switch, too.Except for those who change from iPhone to iPad & to MacBook regularly..having to constantly go into settings to add a Bluetooth device is annoying when you’re used to such a fantastic system as the AirPods and Beats Powerbeats Pro. Those who know what I’m talking about will appreciate it. Those who don’t will just laugh because they know no better.
the ability to convert the headphones between open-back and closed-back.
Jeez! $600 to get laid. That's what I call "inflation".Yes, it's the best pair of headphones available for Apple users.
I've been using one for the last 6 months. I've given away my Airpods Pro to my family because the Max is so much better for office work and general listening. I only miss it when I need something for workouts. Other than that, the Max is simply superior to the Pro.
Airpods Max got me laid once. I had a date with a hot audiophile girl who brought her expensive Sennheisers over to compare to the Max. She swears nothing can beat her Sennheisers in quality. After trying it on, she admitted that the Max sounded much better. This led me to getting laid that evening. Great time.
I just bought a pair, albeit it was from credit card points.People are still buying the AirPods Max???
I am really sorry to hear that. I hope you enjoy them. I bought them near release and I have absolutely hated them. I regret not returning them when I had the chance.I just bought a pair, albeit it was from credit card points.
My experience with the current AirPods Max have been so poor that I would never consider buying another pair no matter how many upgrades they throw at it. They have been sitting in a corner of my house collecting dust. They need a complete redesign. They need to lessen the weight and design it in a way where:Imagine the Apple Marketing department discussion. Question: What changes would make current AirPods Max owners want to spend another $450 to upgrade to an AirPods Max 2?
. Make them lighter?
. Make them USB-C chargeable?
. Increase battery life?
. Make them convertible - open back / closed back?
. Build MagSafe into the case?
. Make them sound even better?
. Change the headband to make them more comfortable?
. Give them the features provided in the AirPods Pro 2?
Conclusion .. These are changes that our customers would like to see. They will of course ask the same final question that we will ask here at this table .. Is it worth it? We think we know, but let's ask the current owners of AirPods Max . . .
Yep, nothing, NOTHING more. Something about SQ? No. About new features only for Max 2 (on cans prop, on IEMs not)? No. Design changes? No. No, no, no, no, no.Lemme save you all some time.
“Every new feature that came to the second generation Pros will come to the second generation Max”.
Done. End of article.
Yep, no mobile headphone, but for stationary purposes, home use only. So if mobile redesigned like you said or... new version AV, gaming, music HQ only not mobile at all. But many features on Pro 2 will be useless for that purposes. ALAC codec, Airplay 2 integration, no delays, future coop with AR/VR product etc. If mobile ALAC codec, AP2 not nessesery, but all you said is crucial.My experience with the current AirPods Max have been so poor that I would never consider buying another pair no matter how many upgrades they throw at it. They have been sitting in a corner of my house collecting dust. They need a complete redesign. They need to lessen the weight and design it in a way where:
1. The headphones can fold and be more portable.
2. Actually have a case that supports mobility.
These headphones are so anti-transport its baffling. They're so heavy and take up so much space due to the design it has been a hassle to go anywhere with them when they're not on my head. And you might say well, just keep them on your head then and my response is that these things are so uncomfortable you will wish you didn't do that.
I like them. You don't. To each his own.My experience with the current AirPods Max have been so poor that I would never consider buying another pair no matter how many upgrades they throw at it. They have been sitting in a corner of my house collecting dust. They need a complete redesign. They need to lessen the weight and design it in a way where:
1. The headphones can fold and be more portable.
2. Actually have a case that supports mobility.
These headphones are so anti-transport its baffling. They're so heavy and take up so much space due to the design it has been a hassle to go anywhere with them when they're not on my head. And you might say well, just keep them on your head then and my response is that these things are so uncomfortable you will wish you didn't do that.
I’m the exact opposite, I don’t have anything that charges via USB C.Nope, earbuds, wireless headphones, kindle, iPad Pro, cameras, battery packs, mother-in-laws hearing aids, yadda yadda yadda all charge up with the same USB cable plugged into the same 20 watt Apple charger. Watch puck takes up the second outlet. Need to charge my phone, keyboard, or ATV remote. Yep second charging station or fiddle around and swap cables.
Yes, I could buy an Apple wired wireless (if the wireless charging puck is wired, is it really wireless) charging station, but guess what, that’s lightning also.
The iPhone 14 should have been thunderbolt.