Mr.PT
macrumors 6502a
I think ride share only would avoid these legal constraints, as it would be considered just a service: kind of “upgraded premium uber”, which would be “smashed” in the process alongside it’s current competitors BTW.They could make cars for ride share and not sell said cars to the general public.
Production should be easy given adequate battery supply. I am still curious about how Apple would deal with the current (independent franchise) dealership laws though.
Don’t underestimate production complexity, Tesla did and it didn’t turn out that great…I also suspect Apple scaled down initial scale of production, due to difficulty in finding production partner able to supply sufficient units for it. The ones capable weren’t interested.
Ultimately I believe Apple ambitious goal is to change the way we use transportation, the same way iPhone changed the way we communicate. Tesla “just” changed the way vehicles are propelled and sold.