I present to you Apple related cheap creaky squeaky bendy material issues.
I own a Tesla, and a polishing cloth, and they are both great products.
You just did such a big self own and don’t even realize it 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I present to you Apple related cheap creaky squeaky bendy material issues.
I own a Tesla, and a polishing cloth, and they are both great products.
You just did such a big self own and don’t even realize it 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Does it crash and burn if you switch on the auto-pilot?
Totally agree. The quality, fit and finish and seating positions aren’t up to the standard of the segment they pretend to play in. I can only imagine that those who think it’s up to scratch have never had a car from that segment and are upwards shopping using incentives and loans. I just don’t get it, some people must have very low standards. But yes the ludicrous mode models do accelerate fast in a straight line. That is about it.Yeah Muskrats always make bad examples and show their ignorance. It comes free with the monitors and even if it is expensive on its own it is actually two very high quality dense material cloth stuck together. It’s not like a garbage Amazon cloth that falls apart after a month.
But Teslas do fall apart sometimes when they are new. Worst made cars I have seen. Must have low standards to like them. If my computer was made of such cheap creaky squeaky bendy materials I would be getting refund.
Totally agree. The quality, fit and finish and seating positions aren’t up to the standard of the segment they pretend to play in. I can only imagine that those who think it’s up to scratch have never had a car from that segment and are upwards shopping using incentives and loans. I just don’t get it, some people must have very low standards. But yes the ludicrous mode models do accelerate fast in a straight line. That is about it.
LOL Comparison with a caddy. I rest my case about standards. 😂It’s about the drive train and the technology. There’s no comparison there. You can buy a much “nicer” gasoline powered vehicle for the same money. You can also buy a very nicely appointed propeller driven aircraft, or you can buy a jet.
I still own two other cars (Cadillacs) and while the appointments are certainly finer, they feel like driving tractors in comparison. Looking forward to an EV based Caddy coupe some day, but it’ll cost a lot more then a comparable ICE powered one.
I did not get any EV incentives on my Model 3 performance, nor did I buy with a loan. And unless you are literally driving a track car, I’ll destroy you in the twisties, too. Hard to beat a Tesla due to the low center of gravity, especially the performance.
LOL Compatison with a caddy. I test my case about standards. 😂
Tesla today announced the launch of the Tesla Wireless Charging Platform, a $300 wireless charger that is able to charge up to three Qi devices at one time.
![]()
The concept is somewhat similar to the AirPower that Apple wanted to produce as the three devices can be placed anywhere on the Tesla charging mat, receiving up to 15W of power each.
Tesla says that the angular design of the charging mat was inspired by the look of the Cybertruck, and it features an aluminum housing with an alcantara surface and detachable magnetic stand that can be used for charging flat or at an angle.
Apple in September 2017 announced the AirPower, a multi-device charger designed to charge the iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods all at once. Apple wanted users to be able to place their devices anywhere on the AirPower to charge, but the overlapping wireless coils required were problematic, with Apple seeing heat management and interference issues that prevented the product from being viable. While the AirPower was meant to launch in 2018, it never appeared, and Apple confirmed its cancelation in 2019.
Tesla's charging mat is using FreePower, a technology from Aira that has been used in other wireless charging platforms like the Base Station Pro from Nomad. Nomad's Base Station Pro also supported charging from anywhere on the charging platform, but it turned out to be problematic because it did not work well with the iPhone 12 and later because of a firmware issue.
While Tesla's concept is similar to what Apple hoped to achieve with the AirPower, it is limited to Qi-based devices like the iPhone and the AirPods and it does not charge the Apple Watch.
Article Link: Tesla Launches $300 AirPower-Like Wireless Charger That Can Power Three Qi Devices at Onc
“While Tesla's concept is similar to what Apple hoped to achieve with the AirPower, it is limited to Qi-based devices like the iPhone and the AirPods and it does not charge the Apple Watch.” Wasn’t AirPower only supposed to charge Qi-based devices? So even AirPower would have had the same limitation right?
Tesla today announced the launch of the Tesla Wireless Charging Platform, a $300 wireless charger that is able to charge up to three Qi devices at one time.
![]()
The concept is somewhat similar to the AirPower that Apple wanted to produce as the three devices can be placed anywhere on the Tesla charging mat, receiving up to 15W of power each.
Tesla says that the angular design of the charging mat was inspired by the look of the Cybertruck, and it features an aluminum housing with an alcantara surface and detachable magnetic stand that can be used for charging flat or at an angle.
Apple in September 2017 announced the AirPower, a multi-device charger designed to charge the iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods all at once. Apple wanted users to be able to place their devices anywhere on the AirPower to charge, but the overlapping wireless coils required were problematic, with Apple seeing heat management and interference issues that prevented the product from being viable. While the AirPower was meant to launch in 2018, it never appeared, and Apple confirmed its cancelation in 2019.
Tesla's charging mat is using FreePower, a technology from Aira that has been used in other wireless charging platforms like the Base Station Pro from Nomad. Nomad's Base Station Pro also supported charging from anywhere on the charging platform, but it turned out to be problematic because it did not work well with the iPhone 12 and later because of a firmware issue.
While Tesla's concept is similar to what Apple hoped to achieve with the AirPower, it is limited to Qi-based devices like the iPhone and the AirPods and it does not charge the Apple Watch.
Article Link: Tesla Launches $300 AirPower-Like Wireless Charger That Can Power Three Qi Devices at Once
It’s about the drive train and the technology. There’s no comparison there. You can buy a much “nicer” gasoline powered vehicle for the same money. You can also buy a very nicely appointed propeller driven aircraft, or you can buy a jet.
I still own two other cars (Cadillacs) and while the appointments are certainly finer, they feel like driving tractors in comparison. Looking forward to an EV based Caddy coupe some day, but it’ll cost a lot more then a comparable ICE powered one.
I did not get any EV incentives on my Model 3 performance, nor did I buy with a loan. And unless you are literally driving a track car, I’ll destroy you in the twisties, too. Hard to beat a Tesla due to the low center of gravity, especially the performance.
I doubt you own anything. Your posts keep contradicting themselves. You’d rather buy discount low quality cleaning clothes but then you have Apple Polishing Cloth and that wonky car.
I suggest you go re-read my posts before attempting to debate further, I said no such thing.
Yeah you did.
But I’d rather read this awesomeness about the emperor with no clothes.
View attachment 2133194
Who's stupid enough to pay $300 for a charger? LOL .... I mean it's absurdly overpriced even by Apple's standard.
better not look at the teams at Apple and Google
guaranteed you'll find engineers that made your phone that you absolutely hate 🫢
Not if he dies today he won't. He'll be remembered as Barnum. He hasn't done much but generate hype so far-- Tesla in particular needs to survive and stay a top tier automaker through the broader market transition to EVs and build a leadership team that can keep it running without him.
Jobs was a great promoter, and he also spent some time in the wilderness, but he eventually turned Apple into a juggernaut and was able to hand it off to someone who kept it on a growth path.
Oh now I'm convinced! Well argued Sir. Now back to your echo chamber.
Tim
Jobs was no more and no less a promoter than Musk. I never cared about either as a human being and we all now know how much of an ass Jobs was yet today people still act as though he is some kind of Deity.
Nobody will convince you that it is, nobody is trying to convince you that it is either. Only you seem to be trying to convince yourself that it isn't. There is a difference.Great argument, you have convinced me my Tesla is hot garbage. Enjoy those petrol prices by the way.
Honestly, Tesla has historically done REALLY well with any of these random products they sold for a limited time/production run. They always become collectibles and sell on sites like eBay for more than their original prices.Um, ok. Why?
Sounds like a personal problem to me? Maybe you should change your outlook and quit assuming random Tesla owners fit one particular mindset you've assigned to them?Yeah, I'll never buy a Tesla product now – car or phone charger. I was a fan of Musk in years past but all this Twitter stuff has made me realize he's just an entitled narcissistic buffoon. I see someone driving a Tesla now and my gut instinct is that they are as narcissistic and insecure and assholish as Musk. That's not fair to them – and not accurate across all Tesla drivers, but it just goes to show how Musk has tarnished the Tesla brand through his antics.