You're saying Apple had very specific hardware in 2006 to do a different version of the same UI stuff they've been doing for years. Somehow StageManager/Shrinkydink needed a different set of hardware than Expose, Mission Control, App Switcher, etc? Not a chance. It's moving windows around. The same stuff they've been doing for eternity. There's no way an ancient desktop chip has something magical for moving windows that Apple's A chips don't.Why do you keep pushing the "2006 idea" thing? To do certain things on a desktop OS, you need the circuitry to be built into the SoC to support basic functions that don't exist in A-series chips. It doesn't matter if an idea was introduced in 1806. If it isn't present, it can't be used. What it seems like Apple did was to figure out a workaround for the circuitry that wasn't present on the A-series.
I don't know exactly what they needed, but it probably has to do with virtual memory because the A-series never had to do it before, so no circuitry was added to them to do it. If the controllers are present, it's easy to implement. If they aren't, you have to figure out some other way to do it. I'll give you an example. Encoding H.264 is a pretty basic thing these days. Any SoC can do it, but it might take a long time. Throw in a hardware decoder and it takes a tiny fraction of the time it takes to do it with the non-optimized SoC. Note Apple never said it couldn't be done under any circumstance. They said it didn't run acceptably. They say they figured out a way to make it run less crappy than they had it earlier. Make sense to you now?
And why is that a problem?Stage Manager is 2006 technology. It'll run on anything if they allow it. But, gotta sell new iPads.
Second opinion: If an ancient Intel processor can multitask better than every iPad currently on the market, that pretty much guarantees that Stage Manager "limitations" are just product-pushing tactics.
![]()
MacOS Ventura’s best feature is 16 years in the making
Apple introduced Stage Manager with MacOS Ventura, but it seems the feature may not be as new as we thought -- it's been in the works for 16 years.www.digitaltrends.com
More than 2006. Multiple monitor support has been in Windows since Windows 98. Albeit, with appropriate graphics card and drivers. But the fact that functionality like this has been mainstream since 2001, its a shame Apple is doing this. Even their older and ancient PowerBooks could do this. There is absolutely no reason to limit this to M1 iPads. Too bad I don't demand much from my 2017 iPad Pro to really be up in arms over this. But I certainly will be waiting until it no longer is supported before purchasing a new one.Stage Manager is 2006 technology. It'll run on anything if they allow it. But, gotta sell new iPads.
Second opinion: If an ancient Intel processor can multitask better than every iPad currently on the market, that pretty much guarantees that Stage Manager "limitations" are just product-pushing tactics.
![]()
MacOS Ventura’s best feature is 16 years in the making
Apple introduced Stage Manager with MacOS Ventura, but it seems the feature may not be as new as we thought -- it's been in the works for 16 years.www.digitaltrends.com
I am the people and can confirmI think what people really wanted was the external monitor support (or at least a way to get rid of the black bars while mirroring their iPad).
The M1 have more bandwidth for higher res I think?Yeah, that was not well stated in the article.
That sounds like non-M1 iPads lose external display support, with or without Stage Manager, which didn't make any sense at all.
i guess the M1 has the proper graphic card.More than 2006. Multiple monitor support has been in Windows since Windows 98. Albeit, with appropriate graphics card and drivers. But the fact that functionality like this has been mainstream since 2001, its a shame Apple is doing this. Even their older and ancient PowerBooks could do this. There is absolutely no reason to limit this to M1 iPads. Too bad I don't demand much from my 2017 iPad Pro to really be up in arms over this. But I certainly will be waiting until it no longer is supported before purchasing a new one.
Well weren’t they and now they backtracked?Good news for those of us rocking the 2018 iPad Pro, one of the most enduring products Apple has ever released!
Bad news for the cynics who think Apple artificially limits software features just to drive sales.
I was seriously considering upgrading to whatever new iPad comes out next because of this. No longer! I will hold off for at least another year. I love my 2018 Pro and don’t feel at all like it’s sluggish and needs a bit more power. It is hands down my favorite iPad.Good news for those of us rocking the 2018 iPad Pro, one of the most enduring products Apple has ever released!
Bad news for the cynics who think Apple artificially limits software features just to drive sales.
Except they do and their rhetoric doesnt line up with todays announcemen…..proving their talking points are BS in many instances.Good news for those of us rocking the 2018 iPad Pro, one of the most enduring products Apple has ever released!
Bad news for the cynics who think Apple artificially limits software features just to drive sales.
Terrible according to devs on twitter.Guys, How about actual “reviews” of how is it working as a beta for now?.