Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The new Mac Pro specs are as follows.

32 core Motown
500 GB DDR 9 10 riser cards let's say 20 perts. I mispelled that on purpose. Lets get an english tutor in here.
10 X 4 TB or is that 4 X 10 maybe 4 10 X 4's or 10 4 X 10's Well what the hell does it matter; Hard Drives
4 Red Ray VDV not DVD burners
10 USB 6.0 Ports
4 Firewire 400
4 Fire Wire 800
10 PCI Express 5.0 Graphics ports. All are SLISILSLI Capable
2 PCI Express 2.0 Ports for whatever
8D sound card.
Laser Optical ports because we can. Ooh pretty red lights.
Red Tooth (who needs to brush here)
Built in 19" LCD for kicks and giggles
And finally but not least R2D2 guard dog
Total cost. Well You would have to be Bill Gates.
Oh did I say it has OS 12 oops there goes that stupid English Errroorrrs again. Any one wish to correct me. There was a little red; dog, and, yet; could he; I, and saw; red hat. Grade F-

That's pathetic. You can't even get a proper MacProWank; look at you! :mad:;):D

Anyone who is anyone knows that the next Mac Pro will drop FireWire 400 and 800 in favor of 3200. Get your facts straight! :p
 
Yeah the 4GB of memory is a lot, but perhaps 1.8GB and the power of two GPUs might outweigh it. I don't really know much about OpenCL (or Cuda) though.

I would think the market is tiny, like a few thousand users tops. The real market for the pro cards doesn't seem to be for the digital content creation market, but ones like science, finance, engineering. Not really the Mac's forté.
That's what I'm not certain on either. So a comparison would be nice (albeit windows), if it ever happens.

The market is small compared to consumer models, no matter what platform. It's the Mac side I'm unsure of in terms of size. Even science and engineering. I know I've seen a few specialty apps in these, but that's it. No idea of saturation.
Anyone who is anyone knows that the next Mac Pro will drop FireWire 400 and 800 in favor of 3200. Get your facts straight! :p
Yeah, right. I'd love to see that, when there's no parts. :eek: :D :p
Dump the FW400, so that leaves FW800. Deal with it. ;) :D
 
518, here we come! :cool:

The average is wrong, you know.

It's an average. That's all it is. :rolleyes:

For those who don't know, the average is very low because the PowerMacs were updated faster. It'll be a long time before enough Mac Pro refreshes are able to bring the average into the realm of a decent guess again.
 
It's an average. That's all it is. :rolleyes:

For those who don't know, the average is very low because the PowerMacs were updated faster. It'll be a long time before enough Mac Pro refreshes are able to bring the average into the realm of a decent guess again.
Or if the PowerMac data is removed. :p
 
It's an average. That's all it is. :rolleyes:

For those who don't know, the average is very low because the PowerMacs were updated faster. It'll be a long time before enough Mac Pro refreshes are able to bring the average into the realm of a decent guess again.

That, and the Buyer's Guide counts the addition of an eight-core option as an update, when it wasn't.
 
Fire Wire. How about forest fire wire. Or Forest Gump Fire Wire. Maybe instead of serial ATA we can have a lucky charm ATA. That's a kinda serial isn't it? You even get the lucky part as a bonus. :D:p
 
Fire Wire. How about forest fire wire. Or Forest Gump Fire Wire. Maybe instead of serial ATA we can have a lucky charm ATA. That's a kinda serial isn't it? You even get the lucky part as a bonus. :D:p

I don't know why they keep skipping the most obvious name for a port connection: Super Ultra Connection, or "SUC" for short.
The first company to adopt such a connection will have an immediate marketing advantage :p hahaa
 
I don't know why they keep skipping the most obvious name for a port connection: Super Ultra Connection, or "SUC" for short.
The first company to adopt such a connection will have an immediate marketing advantage :p hahaa

I guess that would mean that you can plug in anything and still cost you lots of money. HehEhEHe Jaja you in deep doo doo. Meesalike this.
 
dell just released this XPS model:
http://i.dell.com/images/global/pro...highlights/desktop-studio-xps-435-design1.jpg

which looks an awful lot like some mac pro mockups here (mainly the front panel being black while the sides are aluminum)..


now im having my doubts if apple will actually go that route.

Apple like's to be original. Mac pro is getting some attention. What company originally sold an 8 core machine for personal use. Yes the Mac Pro was a power house work station. But I felt it was a good value for what comes in the dang thing. You all know what I mean man. Right on Bra.:eek:
 
Apple like's to be original. Mac pro is getting some attention. What company originally sold an 8 core machine for personal use. Yes the Mac Pro was a power house work station. But I felt it was a good value for what comes in the dang thing. You all know what I mean man. Right on Bra.:eek:

There are no personal use programs that can take advantage of those 8-cores.

dell just released this XPS model:
http://i.dell.com/images/global/pro...highlights/desktop-studio-xps-435-design1.jpg

which looks an awful lot like some mac pro mockups here (mainly the front panel being black while the sides are aluminum)..


now im having my doubts if apple will actually go that route.

Slap an Apple logo on it, replace one of the USB2.0 ports with firewire and that's basically the machine I want to buy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.