It's tough times for Arsenal. The problems on the pitch and off it are linked, but which is greater? It's currently fashionable among pundits to class Wenger as outmoded and obsolete in his approach to the game, and over-fond of cheap French prospects versus proven talent. On the other hand the board, like Exxon, continues to announce greater and greater prfots with glee while averything around them goes to the toilet.
The most effective thing the fans could do would be to simply not show up to games in order to demonstrate their disapproval. But that never happens. Neither Liverpool nor Man Utd fans were able to to that in recent years despite being highly displeased with the running of their clubs.
Wenger is the man in the hot seat, because managers always are. If a new man comes in, will it really make a difference alone? Is the problem Wenger or Kroenke & the board?
Both. But more the latter
Wenger for failing to adapt to contemporary football and stubbornly closing himself off in his own illusionary bubble. He's also become an isolated tool for the Board which doesn't help.
Kroenke for being a bog standard businessman who couldn't care less about actual sports other than how its franchises can generate him even more income. Say what you will about Abramovic, but at least he is passionate about the game and wants to win by any and all means necessary.
And of course The Board who have grown senile, only caring about overseeing a trophyless period and ripping fans off for income income income...a chunk of which goes into their retirement funds.
All well and good if it is a Forbes company but its not, its a Football Club. I don't mind running the club on profit but at least reinvest the money onto the field instead of stacking it in bank accounts.
Last edited: