Do we know if Rodgers is 100%. I don't expect to see him play a vintage game. They might have been better to rest him and roll the dice.
Yeah, the Packets are rolling the dice on this one. I'm not sure it is a good idea either.
Do we know if Rodgers is 100%. I don't expect to see him play a vintage game. They might have been better to rest him and roll the dice.
His ego has been hurt for years now, I think he is used to it.I hate the cowboys but I do feel bad for him, I don't want to see any player hurt.
i think they are rushing him too.. but Flynn isn't going to get it done is he? and I like Flynn.
Do the Packers have a better chance with a healthy Flynn or a beat up Rodgers. Does Rodgers in the game actually help the Bears.Yeah, the Packets are rolling the dice on this one. I'm not sure it is a good idea either.
Do we know if Rodgers is 100%. I don't expect to see him play a vintage game. They might have been better to rest him and roll the dice.
So you are willing to throw your franchise QB out there and have him risk a greater injury that could end his career? Vs Rest him the remainder of the season (you most likely won't beat the Seahawks anyways) and have him ready to go full strength next year.Rest him for what, offseason golfing?
Rodgers is an elite quarterback in this league. He's better than all but a handful of guys even when he's not 100%. You gotta give your team the best chance to win the game.
Who the **** is Flynn anyways?
So you are willing to throw your franchise QB out there and have him risk a greater injury that could end his career? Vs Rest him the remainder of the season (you most likely won't beat the Seahawks anyways) and have him ready to go full strength next year.
He has not played a game in over 6 weeks, and you think he is game ready?
So you are willing to throw your franchise QB out there and have him risk a greater injury that could end his career? Vs Rest him the remainder of the season (you most likely won't beat the Seahawks anyways) and have him ready to go full strength next year.
He has not played a game in over 6 weeks, and you think he is game ready?
He's just as likely to get hurt in the season opener next year as he would be to get injured playing this week. Football players are there to play football, if he's medically cleared to go, you put the best players on the field.
Excuse me - he's the man who's going to ban your buttWho the **** is Flynn anyways?
If Rodgers is hurt and can be at greater risk for serious injury then shame on the team. But if he's 100% percent then let him go out and do what he's paid to do.
Excuse me - he's the man who's going to ban your butt
Seriously, he did ok, though he made some really bad mistakes.
If he's still hurt and at a greater risk for re-injury, the doctors wouldn't clear him to play.
So like I said, if he's medically cleared by the doctors, you play him. Never understood why some fans want teams to be "cautious" when bringing players back because they're afraid of them getting hurt again. That's why the teams have doctors to make these decisions. You're either medically cleared to play or you aren't..
Ok Seattle. Today is your big day. Win and you play at home. Lose and you don't.
[edit]
Number one seed. The road to the Super Bowl goes through Seattle for the NFC.
[/edit]
I can't believe the Packers made the playoffs. Although I wholeheartedly don't expect to beat SF in GB I would be thrilled if they could pull off the upset, especially without Clay Matthews playing. That's all I ask for lol
Niners did OK but we would have loved to have seen Seattle lose, just saying.
It's the Seahawks postseason to lose.
Yeah, I don't see the Packers beating the 49ers, but congratulations on making the playoffs.
thanks for your opinion, here's hoping you're wrong and that the broncs go out in their first round![]()
thanks for your opinion, here's hoping you're wrong and that the broncs go out in their first round![]()