Johnathan Wilson's
piece in the Guardian today puts the blame on the ownership, and I also makes a pretty good case for the severity of what I've just decided to call the Ronaldo Problem. His presence in the side makes it impossible to stay solid against equal or superior opponents. Even the best manager would struggle to build an effective team shape if Ronaldo had to start every match. At this point he should be an impact sub (or starter against less dangerous teams) but his ego will never permit that. And so Man Utd suffers. It's only part pf the problem, and OGS is not responsible for his presence, but I think Wilson is correct here. It's a vanity signing by a delusional ownership.
After FSG bought Liverpool, the owners hired an old club 'legend' (Dalglish) as manager. He brought a feel-good attitude and won a League Cup but had probably reached (exceeded?) his ceiling at that point and was replaced by an up-and-comer (Rogers). Rogers was, frankly, unlucky not to win the league (and how history might have been different!), but his project did subsequently develop a staleness for several reasons, and he was replaced with a highly-rated and proven foreign manager (Klopp) who delivered on taking his own career and the club to the next level. But that all took a decade to accomplish.
If OGS is compared to Dalglish, I think we can say he's done less with more and has been kept on too long. Like Dalglish, he has the right presence and attitude, but the product is not only not there, it's not coming (this is where I definitely disagree with OGS's claim that they are 'close' to clicking).