Exactly, especially when the changes are so minor that most people don't even notice. Everyone here complaining probably makes up the 0.5% of people worldwide who have cared about this enough to even notice the change.10.x.x -> 10.5: People whine about the menus being too transparent and having "vista blur".
10.5.1 -> 10.5.2: People whine that Apple change them back to higher opacity.
Conclusion:Unable to win.
Solution: People need to find more important things to whine about.
10.x.x -> 10.5: People whine about the menus being too transparent and having "vista blur".
10.5.1 -> 10.5.2: People whine that Apple change them back to higher opacity.
Conclusion:Unable to win.
Solution: People need to find more important things to whine about.
Exactly, especially when the changes are so minor that most people don't even notice. Everyone here complaining probably makes up the 0.5% of people worldwide who have cared about this enough to even notice the change.
Really, this is just complaining for the sake of complaining, it makes people feel important.
I like the update. Much more readable. This was especially noticeable with a menu drop-down over text or contrasting backgrounds. When you got a drop-down over a floating menu, for instance, it was much harder to read.
I've posted some screenshots pre and post update in this thread
Dave
Notice the lack of the option in my system preferences.
And yeah, I had to check the shortcut for screen print![]()
You are on PPC. I thought there was never a translucent menu bar on PPC macs (or some of them anyway)
It's because you're using a 12" PowerBook. Their graphics cards aren't Core Image capable...
No, the solution was quite simple. Most of the people before were whining about the translucent menu bar, not the menus. Apple gave them the option of turning it off, while those of us who liked it kept it on, and if Apple decided to mess with the translucency too by effectively turning it off (yes, I know it's still there, but really, it's next to impossible to notice it at all) then what would have made the most sense is to put that as an option, too. It makes no sense at all to make one an option and flat-out change the other when someone people preferred it the original way.
No, the reason people complained about the menubar was because it lowered readability and was nothing more than a "me-too" of Vista's effects. People were complaining about the menus, exactly how I stated. They called them harder to read, and coupled with 'lame vista blur'. Of course, now they've changed it, people always jumps on the bandwagon of "Oh it's the wrong thing! Apple doesn't do what we want! The sky is falling!" which happens every time people decide they know how to manage OS X better than them.
Arguing for customizability is all well and dandy but as a previous poster said, for the most part it adds nothing but confusion to new users. It doesn't matter anyway, most people will have forgotten about the whole thing by 10.5.4, and moved on to arguing about the next inane thing (MBA will never sell! Why is there no xMac?! etc).
No, the reason people complained about the menubar was because it lowered readability and was nothing more than a "me-too" of Vista's effects. People were complaining about the menus, exactly how I stated. They called them harder to read, and coupled with 'lame vista blur'. Of course, now they've changed it, people always jumps on the bandwagon of "Oh it's the wrong thing! Apple doesn't do what we want! The sky is falling!" which happens every time people decide they know how to manage OS X better than them.
Arguing for customizability is all well and dandy but as a previous poster said, for the most part it adds nothing but confusion to new users. It doesn't matter anyway, most people will have forgotten about the whole thing by 10.5.4, and moved on to arguing about the next inane thing (MBA will never sell! Why is there no xMac?! etc).
There's no bandwagon, and there's no one saying they know how to manage OS X better than Apple. Apple was the one that originally implemented the translucent menus, and really it's the people who wanted the opacity that are saying they know how to manage OS X better. I liked the translucency, and never found it harder to read. In fact, in another thread, I explained just how the translucency could even be very useful for some of us. Back in 10.5.1 I wanted the whiners to get their OPTION opaque menu bar so they could be happy. They got it, and they are happy. I was never expecting that it would mean losing translucent menus, otherwise I would have been against the idea back in 10.5.1. It makes no sense to make one an option and the other not. Why are you so against us getting the option to have our translucent menus again?
IT SUCKS that they force this stuff on us. They give us some things... and they take some away... that's crap. If they ship an OS with certain "features" I don't think they should take them away in point upgrades. And before anyone tells me not to upgrade, I want the bug fixes just like everyone else, so it's either -- stay in a buggy version of the OS just for cosmetics... or upgrade and be reminded of how terrible the menus look now every time I click one.
This was just how I felt. It felt terrible saying goodbye to the translucent menus, but I needed X11 to work, which 10.5.2 promised (and it does work now), so I had no choice but upgrade. I just want my menus how they were...
Still no Terminal command?