I think you mean, “as successful”, not just, “successful”.Question: Would iJustine have been successful, at all, if she were not also attractive?
Answer: Not at all. Not even close.
That's just reality.
I think you mean, “as successful”, not just, “successful”.Question: Would iJustine have been successful, at all, if she were not also attractive?
Answer: Not at all. Not even close.
That's just reality.
Is that really the only alternative?Yep. She's almost always positive. If you want a sour, cynical view of technology watch other videos.
Yes. Your age and status qualify you to make what must be a 100% spot on assessment of the thoughts of everybody on this forum.I'm a 50 year old white male and it's obvious what's going on here with these comments... sexism and jealousy. How dare a blond female discuss tech!! I think she's great to watch and my girls love watching her, which makes them interested in tech too. Is she my preferred tech reviewer? No, but that doesn't mean she's a "shill" or whatever else you call her. She seems to know her stuff too, certainly more than a lot of us more casual readers interested in Apple products.
Whilst we should have evolved past it. People like to look at things, (including other people), that are easy on the eye.
The alternative is not watching videos from someone you don't like.Is that really the only alternative?
Maybe something was lost in translation here. Who said I’m watching these videos? The only issue I took is calling them reviews, which they are not.The alternative is not watching videos from someone you don't like.
I agree with you and don't even let myself consider tuning into anything she does or is featured in for this reason.I respect what she does, but I do wish she would see the flaws and not think everything is amazing, even talking about the studio display she said I love that display and there isn't any issues, she just can't ever say one thing is bad, that's why she can't be trusted for reviews
Nah, they meant what they said. They think her only asset is her looks which of course is subjective in the first place but that's besides the point.I think you mean, “as successful”, not just, “successful”.
Nah, they meant what they said. They think her only asset is her looks which of course is subjective in the first place but that's besides the point.
Getting mad at iJustine for her take on tech is like getting mad at a kids' TV-show presenter doing a segment on the history of Japan who doesn't talk about the destructive work ethic and subsequent depression that's plaguing the Japanese workforce today.On the flip side, maybe everything isn't always as awful as everyone makes it out to be, and publishing an opinion that matches, maybe what, 5-10% of consumers will think doesn't make sense when you make content to appeal to the other 90%.
I see so much hate for her in these forums and I don't get it. If you don't like her, don't watch her content, don't watch her reviews. Hold out for the ones you care about instead. You will probably never see the 90%/casual audience moaning about the more in depth technical reviewers, so why do we always see the 10%/hardcore audience getting upset about content aimed at a more casual audience?
Like many other influencers, she has to be seen as the longer arm of the Apple marketing staff and NOT as an independent tech reviewer. As an influencer she does a very good job, but a horrible one as a tech journalist. It’s the same with every other media published, no matter if printed or digital, Do you have to pose the question, who is publishing for which target groups and with what kind of agenda in mind. Many people confuse influencers with friends, but they want to sell a product.I respect what she does, but I do wish she would see the flaws and not think everything is amazing, even talking about the studio display she said I love that display and there isn't any issues, she just can't ever say one thing is bad, that's why she can't be trusted for reviews
iJustine is for kids, teens, young adults and anyone wanting to get into tech and need something that's very easy to grasp but still has more depth than advertising.
They are reviews. Just because they don't go in depth enough for you doesn't make them something else.Maybe something was lost in translation here. Who said I’m watching these videos? The only issue I took is calling them reviews, which they are not.
No, I didn’t ignore the weight. If that’s your primary concern, then buy the MacBook M1 Air. Because $200 is still $200, to use your words. And in percentages, that’s a MUCH bigger difference than the $100 difference between the m2 air and the 14” pro. And I noticed you used % to talk about weight but in actual terms .7 lbs not a big deal for people who care about performance.So you just completely ignore all of my points about esthetics and battery life, two things that are very important to normal customers.
And once again, price is price, $100 is still $100 that could be going to something else like AppleCare.
Clearly you don’t understand the average consumer who couldn’t tell you a 3nanometer chip from a barbecue chip.
To them for $200 less they get pretty colors, smaller and lighter design and longer battery.
Why do you care what they purchase as long as they’re happy?
Personally, I know for my needs that a 14 MBP would be absolutely overkill and I’d never use even half of its power.
120hz isn’t something that I notice or care about.
I also do quite a bit of traveling, so the thinner, lighter design and longer battery are of major benefit to me.
I’d rather put my money towards an air then a pro, and I am in the majority.
I have absolutely no reason to lug around an extra pound of computer just because… well… it’s only an extra $200
"crippled" There's that word again. Even though it isn't true in terms of the workload actually intended for these base models.buy the crippled M2 Air.
… and over 70% of users buy the base model, not the upgraded model Apple shadily gave to reviewers.
I myself couldn't bother watching ANYTHING featuring the super-annoying and super-shallow iJustine so I can't really comment on this video. Nevertheless, I do remember cases where - to tell the truth - MR editors did prove to be pretty much clueless. See https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-an-older-iphone-its-time-to-upgrade.2314868/you're bashing iJustine, but are the these two dudes from MacRumors any better? to me they all seem clueless, iJustine is at least decent looking
Oh come on... I've several times linked to her Tim Cook interview where she has PROVED she knows nothing of even the very basics of camera technology. And that's only one example of how shallow her "knowledge" is.And can you believe she held up an old second-generation MBA when talking about the original one... talk about shallow knowledge. /sarcasm
So what. Was she doing an in-depth camera review or was it a general conversation? Has she every pretended like she has technical knowledge of cameras? At least she is honest about her knowledge as she only speaks about technology as far as how she uses it. Besides, she hired someone a while back to handle the camera aspect of her show so there is even less reason for her to have "camera knowledge" beyond a basic understanding of how it applies to her workflow.Oh come on... I've several times linked to his Tim Cook interview where she has PROVED she knows nothing of even the very basics of camera technology. And that's only one example of how shallow her "knowledge" is.
Yes, she's a great showperson (for people that can put up with her style), but nothing else.
Look, some forum members here even repeatedly(!) state (along with accusing us being sexists because we dislike iJustine) she has a way better understanding of technology than us and this is why she is far more successful than we here at MR forums.So what. Was she doing an in-depth camera review; was she getting into deep technical aspects, or was it a general conversation? At least she is honest about her knowledge as she only speaks about technology as far as how she uses it. Besides, she hired someone a while back to handle the camera aspect of her show so there is even less reason for her to have "camera knowledge" beyond a basic understanding of how it applies to her workflow.
Congratulations, you know more about technology than iJustine. I don't recall her ever pretending that she has a deep technical understanding of the technology she uses; its always in the context of how she uses it.Look, some forum members here even repeatedly(!) state (along with accusing us being sexists because we dislike iJustine) she has a way better understanding of technology than us and this is why she is far more successful than we here at MR forums.
Yes - he has earned a lot of money by her "Oh great!!!!" Apple-b*ttlicking (and being pretty). But does that mean she's more knowledgeable than us? Hardly...
It's their publicly stated reasons for disliking her and/or dismissing her success that is being called sexist.