Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am a fan of the notch except on the base model, smallest-screen-size MacBook. It takes away all your "screen real estate".
M1 MBA: 13.3 inch display
M2 MBA: 13.6 inch display, 13.3 below notch
You’re losing nothing.
The old MacBook Air had a 13.3 inch 2560 X 1600 display.
Take away the notch, and the new Air has a 13.3 inch 2560 X 1600 display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal
Why would any professional, or people with common sense, buy an upgraded M2 laptop when for about the same price they can get a vastly superior 14” MBP?
It’s almost 40% thinner.
It’s around a pound lighter
it’s overall volume is much smaller
It’s quieter
Not everyone needs or notices XDR/120hz
It comes in more colors
It has a significantly better battery than the 14 inch (11 hours of web on 14 vs 15 hours on Air)
People know they don’t need half of the stuff the pro has, and it would be better in someone else’s hands.
And finally, no matter how small the difference is, no matter how many people are trying to convince everyone else otherwise, price does matter and cheaper is cheaper.
The Air with 512gb of storage and 16GB of RAM straight from Apple is $400 cheaper than the same specification 14 inch.
Sure, you can get the almost year old pro for a major discount on Amazon or BestBuy, but everyone knows that, in five months or so, You’re gonna see those same discounts on the air and it’s gonna make that price difference just as drastic all over again.
 
I don’t even want to dive into this debate, but one thing a lot of people are forgetting about iJustine is that she has been in this field for a loooooooooooooooooooong time.
She’s been posting YouTube videos quite frequently since 2006.
She was attending Apple events since as far back is 2007, maybe earlier.
Her first video that got quite a lot of traction across tech blogs and such Was her AT&T iPhone bill video which came out 15 years ago.
Her content may not be for everyone, but you can’t deny her ethic is impressive.
She was one of the first to do it, and she’s still here
 
I'm a 50 year old white male and it's obvious what's going on here with these comments... sexism and jealousy. How dare a blond female discuss tech!! I think she's great to watch and my girls love watching her, which makes them interested in tech too. Is she my preferred tech reviewer? No, but that doesn't mean she's a "shill" or whatever else you call her. She seems to know her stuff too, certainly more than a lot of us more casual readers interested in Apple products.
 
Apple is doomed because of math. It's a 100% increase to move from M1 to M2. But when the M3 comes out it will only be a 50% increase over M2. And by the time the M10 falls to the M11, the increase will be down to a measly 10%. /s
 
It’s almost 40% thinner.
It’s around a pound lighter
it’s overall volume is much smaller
It’s quieter
Not everyone needs or notices XDR/120hz
It comes in more colors
It has a significantly better battery than the 14 inch (11 hours of web on 14 vs 15 hours on Air)
People know they don’t need half of the stuff the pro has, and it would be better in someone else’s hands.
And finally, no matter how small the difference is, no matter how many people are trying to convince everyone else otherwise, price does matter and cheaper is cheaper.
The Air with 512gb of storage and 16GB of RAM straight from Apple is $400 cheaper than the same specification 14 inch.
Sure, you can get the almost year old pro for a major discount on Amazon or BestBuy, but everyone knows that, in five months or so, You’re gonna see those same discounts on the air and it’s gonna make that price difference just as drastic all over again.
People can find a thousand ways to rationalize just about anything but that doesn’t mean it’s rational.

If a user doesn’t “need half of the stuff the pro has,” and “price does matter,” then the base M1 Air is a FAR better choice than the crippled M2 Air.

The M2 Air with 16/512 is a whopping $1700! If a user doesn’t need performance, why in the world would anyone pay that much for a laptop, especially when the faster, better 14” MBP is going for $1800??

In 5 months, we might see the M2 Pro/Max MBP built on a 3nm process that won’t have the overheating and throttling issues of the current M2 Air and the crippled SSD (so that Apple could save $1.50) which will drive down the price of the M1 MBP even further so your point is not only speculative, but myopic.
 
Well who doesn’t like looking at a Schwarzenegger six pack LOL. I just think it’s a bit much to imply that someone with 7 million subs only got there or even partly got there because of some physical attribute. If that’s all it took to get 7 million subs I’m sure they would be a lot more people doing it.
It's the same reason as Hollywood selects attractive, young women as stars of their action movies. These action movies are mostly targeted at / consumed by males. An old, fat etc. woman wouldn't attract so many folks. That's how evolution and biology works:

1, men are attracted to attractive, young women as we're programmed to prefer fertile women
2, women are attracted to 'sixpacks' because they need somebody that could be able to defend them and also to receive the best possible genes from
 
It is impossible that he has a video saying that though because on this very site earlier today, Max Tech was called an Apple shill.

Before you post the video, I know he said it.
He even has cited and shown a lot of "hey, MaxTech, you're an Apple shill" comments in one of his latest videos.
 
People can find a thousand ways to rationalize just about anything but that doesn’t mean it’s rational.

If a user doesn’t “need half of the stuff the pro has,” and “price does matter,” then the base M1 Air is a FAR better choice than the crippled M2 Air.

The M2 Air with 16/512 is a whopping $1700! If a user doesn’t need performance, why in the world would anyone pay that much for a laptop, especially when the faster, better 14” MBP is going for $1800??

In 5 months, we might see the M2 Pro/Max MBP built on a 3nm process that won’t have the overheating and throttling issues of the current M2 Air and the crippled SSD (so that Apple could save $1.50) which will drive down the price of the M1 MBP even further so your point is not only speculative, but myopic.
So you just completely ignore all of my points about esthetics and battery life, two things that are very important to normal customers.
And once again, price is price, $100 is still $100 that could be going to something else like AppleCare.
Clearly you don’t understand the average consumer who couldn’t tell you a 3nanometer chip from a barbecue chip.
To them for $200 less they get pretty colors, smaller and lighter design and longer battery.
Why do you care what they purchase as long as they’re happy?
Personally, I know for my needs that a 14 MBP would be absolutely overkill and I’d never use even half of its power.
120hz isn’t something that I notice or care about.
I also do quite a bit of traveling, so the thinner, lighter design and longer battery are of major benefit to me.
I’d rather put my money towards an air then a pro, and I am in the majority.
I have absolutely no reason to lug around an extra pound of computer just because… well… it’s only an extra $200
 
Last edited:
I respect what she does, but I do wish she would see the flaws and not think everything is amazing, even talking about the studio display she said I love that display and there isn't any issues, she just can't ever say one thing is bad, that's why she can't be trusted for reviews
On the flip side, maybe everything isn't always as awful as everyone makes it out to be, and publishing an opinion that matches, maybe what, 5-10% of consumers will think doesn't make sense when you make content to appeal to the other 90%.

I see so much hate for her in these forums and I don't get it. If you don't like her, don't watch her content, don't watch her reviews. Hold out for the ones you care about instead. You will probably never see the 90%/casual audience moaning about the more in depth technical reviewers, so why do we always see the 10%/hardcore audience getting upset about content aimed at a more casual audience?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
It’s almost 40% thinner.
It’s around a pound lighter
it’s overall volume is much smaller
It’s quieter
Not everyone needs or notices XDR/120hz
It comes in more colors
It has a significantly better battery than the 14 inch (11 hours of web on 14 vs 15 hours on Air)
People know they don’t need half of the stuff the pro has, and it would be better in someone else’s hands.
And finally, no matter how small the difference is, no matter how many people are trying to convince everyone else otherwise, price does matter and cheaper is cheaper.
The Air with 512gb of storage and 16GB of RAM straight from Apple is $400 cheaper than the same specification 14 inch.
Sure, you can get the almost year old pro for a major discount on Amazon or BestBuy, but everyone knows that, in five months or so, You’re gonna see those same discounts on the air and it’s gonna make that price difference just as drastic all over again.
I agree with most of that, however disagree on your last statement. One of the reasons the Pros are discounted at Amazon or Best Buy or Costco is because they carry stock configurations which are 16/512 and 16/1TB. The MBA stock configs are 8/256 and 8/512. So if you do want a 16GB version or a 1TB version they BTO only which rules out those retailers and the discounts.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I think this is what bothers some people. Her positivity goes against their negativity...

Oh the notch the notch the notch... But it has only one NAND. One NAND is bad!... How could she talk good about the one NAND laptop... What about no fan? It need a fan... 😂
😂
No. Not buying that.
I look at motoring shows and there are loads of people that might have mad enthusiasm for a particular brand or for cars in general.
Some talk crap and some don’t. Some shill the entire way through the segment and some don’t. No amount of enthusiasm should serve as a license to lie or be too subjective. It hurts everybody.
There are two reasons why she does.
1. She loves the ‘fame’ and money it brings in.
2. She has no real attachment or culpability to the people she influences. I like Apple products a lot. When I speak to friends, relatives and colleagues I’m open and honest about them. Part of the reason is that I know these people well and feel a sense of responsibility about the recommendation I’m giving. Justine I suspect, does not.
 
Last edited:
I like Apple products a lot. When I speak to friends, relatives and colleagues I’m open and honest about them. Part of the reason is that I know these people well and feel a sense of responsibility about the recommendation I’m giving.

I've always been just like this also

Honestly, it's been a really mixed bag on recommendations over the last decade or so.

On the whole though, I will say the MBA has definitely been one product I've always felt pretty much great recommending to most anyone.
 
I don't know how "obviously wrong" the question is. It struck me the same way. Because you weren't simply asking a question. You asked a specific question related to how much her success is related to her appearance, which clearly sounds sexist.

You may not be a sexist person, and I'm not saying you are. But that question is pretty problematic.
I’m not sure.
A statement can certainly be sexist, but a question?
 
IMO there is a lot of vitriol on here directed at Jusitne and a lot of it has a tinge of sexism. I don't watch YouTube reviews so can't comment on how they come across but some of the language used on here does tick a sexism box unfortunately. I don't mind people posting about how she is a bad reviewer but these kind of comments are just dubious , such as:

"cute tech nerd girls", I've yet to hear a male reviewer being described in this way

"IMO she's well past her prime" again, not a criticism levelled at male reviewers.

Im sure you aren't a sexist or anything, but its a bit of an unfortunate use off language imo. Not meaning to single out the person who posted that as it seems to be the general vibe here (Im still shuddering at the recent usage of "bresticles" somewhere else here recently.

But hey, what do I know, Im probably just a woman who is well past their prime /s

This is the real world. Rightly or wrongly Pretty women I would suggest often get a break simply because they are pretty.
Are you seriously telling me you don’t see that?
Whilst we should have evolved past it. People like to look at things, (including other people), that are easy on the eye.
In my opinion, men are a lot more easily influenced by pretty women than they would like to believe.
Probably gonna be flamed but I think a lot of men would love the attention of a pretty woman regardless of the setting or reason.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.