Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What describes you?

  • No way would I build a hackintosh

    Votes: 349 23.0%
  • I'd consider it if Apple doesn't provide a new Mini or headless iMac in the next three months

    Votes: 185 12.2%
  • I'm considering it right now

    Votes: 578 38.2%
  • I already built one

    Votes: 403 26.6%

  • Total voters
    1,515
there is a really good thread about osx on a 1000H over at the msi wind forum

here's the link



nice! mine hovers around the high 30's

1z3v1a8.jpg

How are you getting your core temps? I tried Temperature Monitor, but it will only display the hard drive temps.
 
How are you getting your core temps? I tried Temperature Monitor, but it will only display the hard drive temps.
wierd, temp monitor works on mine

there is a really good thread about osx on a 1000H over at the msi wind forum

here's the link



nice! mine hovers around the high 30's

1z3v1a8.jpg

how do you have a 36x multiplier? i thought the q6600 was limited to a 9x max multiplier

for instance, heres mine
 

Attachments

  • screenshot_01.jpg
    screenshot_01.jpg
    83.8 KB · Views: 96
How are you getting your core temps? I tried Temperature Monitor, but it will only display the hard drive temps.

i had the same problem on my E8400 hackint0sh, the trick was to enter the following command in a terminal

Code:
defaults write com.bresink.system.tempmonitor EnableCoreTempReadingsForCPU10670 1

This is from the temp monitor website

I don't see any core temperature sensors for my Intel-based Mac although I have installed the driver for extended x86 sensor support. The sensors have been visible in version 4.4 of the application and on my older Intel-based systems. Is this a problem with the program?

No, this indicates that your system is equipped with the third generation of Intel Core processors, using 45 nm technology. As confirmed by Intel, the Digital Thermal Sensors (DTS) which measure the core temperatures no longer behave linear enough in this processor generation to be used to display absolute readings in low temperature ranges. The readings are too inaccurate to be useful. Only in high temperature ranges where the core is about 20 centigrades below its specified maximum temperature limit, the sensors can be used to detect overtemperature situations. For this reason, Temperature Monitor will completely suppress display of core sensors for the affected processors. Hardware Monitor will display them as status sensors that give the reading "0" if the temperature is acceptable, and "1" when a core enters a critical temperature range and is about to overheat. Note that you can still monitor temperature readings per processor (not per core).

You can enable inaccurate temperature display for the affected processors for testing purposes. However, we don't recommend nor support this:

1. Ensure that the driver for extended x86 support is installed and quit the application.
2. Open a Terminal window and enter one of the following commands:

When using Hardware Monitor:

defaults write com.bresink.system.hardwaremonitor EnableCoreTempReadingsForCPU10670 1

When using Temperature Monitor:

defaults write com.bresink.system.tempmonitor EnableCoreTempReadingsForCPU10670 1

To return to normal operation, quit the application and use one of the following commands:

defaults delete com.bresink.system.hardwaremonitor EnableCoreTempReadingsForCPU10670

defaults delete com.bresink.system.tempmonitor EnableCoreTempReadingsForCPU10670

wierd, temp monitor works on mine



how do you have a 36x multiplier? i thought the q6600 was limited to a 9x max multiplier

for instance, heres mine

you are correct the q6600 is limited to a 9x multiplier, i think its my bios on my mobo its a very old version F3 and really needs to be updated to at least F8 that's why the multiplier says 36x ... but since it aint broke ...
 
lol how are those even related?!

i had that problem when i used a distro (kalyway to be exact)

once i went boot-132, it worked

Temperature Monitor requires the speech files for its say the temperatures warnings/announcements so it expects them to be there which they are not in those distros that remove them to save space a retail install does not have this problem.
 
you know where those file are located?

Temperature monitor is sometimes sensitive to the voice you have selected for speech under OSX. Just go into your OSX settings and change the voice to one of the first two options. I was getting the same message and when I changed the voice in OSX it worked just fine. I'm logged into my Vista partition right now so I can't tell you specifically what voice I have selected. If you don't get it the first time try again. It should work.
 
well apparently i have a bad speech synthesizer so it looks like i wont be using the temperatures very soon....

funny ... i had the same problem, go to System Preference > Speech and lower the Speaking Rate to between slow and normal, Temp Monitor should work after that adjustment
 
lol how are those even related?!

i had that problem when i used a distro (kalyway to be exact)

once i went boot-132, it worked

haha i have NO idea how they are related, it just gives me this random message and refuses to open......

funny ... i had the same problem, go to System Preference > Speech and lower the Speaking Rate to between slow and normal, Temp Monitor should work after that adjustment

hhhmmm interesting i will try it!!! thanks

EDIT: AWSOME!!! it worked!!!! CPU is sitting on 35°C while on idle, thats a tad hot.. mainly because i have the crappiest fan and case, which is in a cupboard with less than 1cm around the whole thing lol..
 
haha i have NO idea how they are related, it just gives me this random message and refuses to open......



hhhmmm interesting i will try it!!! thanks

EDIT: AWSOME!!! it worked!!!! CPU is sitting on 35°C while on idle, thats a tad hot.. mainly because i have the crappiest fan and case, which is in a cupboard with less than 1cm around the whole thing lol..

the q6600 is safe until you start hitting over the 70C range from the many sources ive read online
here's one
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/221745-29-core-quad-temperature-guide

mine right now are
39,39,36,37
full load running CPUtest are in the range of
69,69,66,66
 
8 cores
picture1al3.png


4 cores
picture2cl5.png


That's impressive. A 4 core machine nearly matching the performance of an 8 core machine in the 32bit test. And, since I'm all about performance per dollar the total cost for a 920 i7 with 6GBs of 1600 DDR3, a 1TB 3Gb SATA HD, a 9800GT 512MB, with a case, PSU, KB/M and copy of OSX comes to $1600. :D

Edit: Also, the Mac Pro score above is the absolute highest Mac Pro 8 core 3.2GHz score in the 32bit Geekbench 2 benchmark that's listed in their results browser.
 
Does anyone know if a pci firewire card will work with a hac? I could probably figure this out myself by just trying it, but i have stuff to do and cant turn this machine off for a while.
From waht i can see printed on the board its a SCI Firestorm card.
Thanks!
 
Does anyone know if a pci firewire card will work with a hac? I could probably figure this out myself by just trying it, but i have stuff to do and cant turn this machine off for a while.
From waht i can see printed on the board its a SCI Firestorm card.
Thanks!

I've got a PCI Firewire card in my Hack. It was just some cheep-o generic one I picked up on Newegg. Plugged it in and it was working. Didn't need any additional kexts or anything. Worked just fine with Final Cut and everything.
 
Awesome!
I traded my friend his firewire card for some old Dell ram. Now i can use an old firewire drive i've had laying around for ages! Idk what ill do with it though, i dont need a time machine disk... Perhaps ill just keep all sorts of junk on it.
 
I've got a PCI Firewire card in my Hack. It was just some cheep-o generic one I picked up on Newegg. Plugged it in and it was working. Didn't need any additional kexts or anything. Worked just fine with Final Cut and everything.

OOooo this is awsome to know! i have a PCI one sitting around, i might hook my external drives up to the PC to share amoungs the network instead of the laptop. thanks for this :)

@sneezymarbel: why is your hackintosh RAM only 400mhz??
 
Another idea for a firewire port is an Audigy sound card with it on there they work, plus there is a driver for the sound in development that works fairly well from what I read about it.
 
OOooo this is awsome to know! i have a PCI one sitting around, i might hook my external drives up to the PC to share amoungs the network instead of the laptop. thanks for this :)

@sneezymarbel: why is your hackintosh RAM only 400mhz??

That's not my system. I'm guessing it's just reporting the RAM speed incorrectly. It's probably running at 800MHz dual channel. The fact that his system is a new 1366 i7 might have something to do with his RAM speed being reported incorrectly. Maybe Geekbench needs an update or something.
 
That's not my system. I'm guessing it's just reporting the RAM speed incorrectly. It's probably running at 800MHz dual channel. The fact that his system is a new 1366 i7 might have something to do with his RAM speed being reported incorrectly. Maybe Geekbench needs an update or something.

oh ok sorry i thought it was yours! mybad.
that system is very impressive, cant wait to save up money and purchase/build one of them babies, but by time i save up enough money there will probably be something better than i7 :(
 
The DS2H board is now up and running hackintosh. You need the NVidia MB/MBP restore DVD to get the drivers. Only thing not known is its ability to send digital audio out its optical port. This would be about the best Mac HTPC for now. I doubt HDMI works, though.

What would we do without those insanelymac guys?
 
The DS2H board is now up and running hackintosh. You need the NVidia MB/MBP restore DVD to get the drivers. Only thing not known is its ability to send digital audio out its optical port. This would be about the best Mac HTPC for now. I doubt HDMI works, though.

Cave Man, it is time for you to build this Hackintosh so you can give us the benefit of your expertise.

I wonder which is the better mobo.

GA-E7AUM-DS2H or
P5N7A-VM
 
Cave Man, it is time for you to build this Hackintosh so you can give us the benefit of your expertise.

I wonder which is the better mobo.

GA-E7AUM-DS2H or
P5N7A-VM

Gigabyte has probably one of the best histories of producing boards that end up being very friendly to OSX. My vote goes to GA. Of course, you can see from my sig that I'm biased.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.