Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Do these support dp1.4?
What will define this?
If there's a big chance that next mini will NOT support dp1.4, I won't wait for it.

No one knows. If you have buying considerations now, make the choice with what is out there now.
 
I would be disappointed if we didn't get DP 2.0 frankly, along with a glorious new Apple display a level below the XDR.

The retina Macbook Pro was revolutionary in 2012 as was the first 5K iMac. I hope to see something similar happening with AS Macs.
 
Wonder if we might see a replay of the Intel Mac release, where they will release a Silicon Mini in the Spring when they demand all the Developer versions be returned and give them a Silicon Mac mini as a replacement?
 
I would think that the 'demo' Apple Silicon unit being a Mac Mini would kinda give people the idea that Intel Mini's are done...

I haven't kept up on the (Shh, secret) Apple Silicon Mini's. Would it be 'easy' for them to crank them out in larger numbers, likely with slower processors and sell them as the 'New Mac Mini'? Other models will require a bit of work to get them ready, unless Apple and TSMC put out the chips in the same pin-outs of the Intel chips.

And I have an iMac Pro. Buyers remorse...:oops:😞
I think the choice of the Mac mini chassis for the AS development kit was probably just convenience and practicality, rather than a comment or indication of Apple’s roadmap and product plans. So I wouldn’t read anything into it in terms of what that means for the mini going forward.
 
Wonder if we might see a replay of the Intel Mac release, where they will release a Silicon Mini in the Spring when they demand all the Developer versions be returned and give them a Silicon Mac mini as a replacement?
Sounds a bit too optimistic. More likely IMHO they’ll just demand them back and that will be that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MevetS
I think the choice of the Mac mini chassis for the AS development kit was probably just convenience and practicality, rather than a comment or indication of Apple’s roadmap and product plans. So I wouldn’t read anything into it in terms of what that means for the mini going forward.

True, but why go through all that to dump it? The mini would be the perfect first product, or the perfect device in a range of devices released to push the New Apple Silicon Era. I mean, unless the new new mini is a cobbled mess and doesn't work well, which I haven't heard anything to believe is happening. *shrug* What Apple does in the future is something we can only guess at. An Apple chipped mini seems like a great idea, and an already 'ready for prime-time' product. Baby steps to release. Swapping processor brands could be easy as swapping a few chips, to as involved as swapping most of the chips. I saw a video that showed an Apple system that mixed Motorola 6800 chips and Mostek 6502 support chips. You go with what you know...
 
True, but why go through all that to dump it? The mini would be the perfect first product, or the perfect device in a range of devices released to push the New Apple Silicon Era. I mean, unless the new new mini is a cobbled mess and doesn't work well, which I haven't heard anything to believe is happening. *shrug* What Apple does in the future is something we can only guess at. An Apple chipped mini seems like a great idea, and an already 'ready for prime-time' product. Baby steps to release. Swapping processor brands could be easy as swapping a few chips, to as involved as swapping most of the chips. I saw a video that showed an Apple system that mixed Motorola 6800 chips and Mostek 6502 support chips. You go with what you know...
The Mac mini simply isn't a major priority for Apple. They've demonstrated they're not all that interested in tossing all their work and starting over repeatedly, so while I can believe the Mac mini will still look the same outwardly, an ARM Mac is probably going to be all-new inside and then stay as similar as possible from then on. They're not going to piecemeal it, they want something they can update and then forget for a year or two like they have with the current one save for spec bumps.

At this point, we're in uncharted territory with Apple making its own chips; we don't know how much tech is going to be shared between different platforms (are they only going to make 2–3 Mac chips, maybe just at difference performance thresholds based on power? Are some Macs just going to have iOS device guts? Are they actually going to have BTO processor upgrades or is it going to be like the 2018 Airs where you're just choosing RAM, storage, etc?) so it's impossible to say whether it "makes sense" for Apple to prioritize certain products switching to ARM sooner rather than later.

My gut feeling is that it'll be towards the end of the transition, honestly. The Mac mini is one of the cheapest products Apple makes, but they intentionally pivoted away from being the "budget" computer with the 2018 version, embracing its use as the "and everything else" Mac that's used as a server, secondary Mac, hobby machine, media digest, etc. That's a more professional niche like the Mac Pro, which I would likewise expect to be one of the last machines to switch (because pro users are going to be more gun-shy about new architectures, and because Mac's chips are untested in the real world with such massive performance requirements.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Miat and Boyd01
The Mac mini simply isn't a major priority for Apple. They've demonstrated they're not all that interested in tossing all their work and starting over repeatedly, so while I can believe the Mac mini will still look the same outwardly, an ARM Mac is probably going to be all-new inside and then stay as similar as possible from then on. They're not going to piecemeal it, they want something they can update and then forget for a year or two like they have with the current one save for spec bumps.

At this point, we're in uncharted territory with Apple making its own chips; we don't know how much tech is going to be shared between different platforms (are they only going to make 2–3 Mac chips, maybe just at difference performance thresholds based on power? Are some Macs just going to have iOS device guts? Are they actually going to have BTO processor upgrades or is it going to be like the 2018 Airs where you're just choosing RAM, storage, etc?) so it's impossible to say whether it "makes sense" for Apple to prioritize certain products switching to ARM sooner rather than later.

My gut feeling is that it'll be towards the end of the transition, honestly. The Mac mini is one of the cheapest products Apple makes, but they intentionally pivoted away from being the "budget" computer with the 2018 version, embracing its use as the "and everything else" Mac that's used as a server, secondary Mac, hobby machine, media digest, etc. That's a more professional niche like the Mac Pro, which I would likewise expect to be one of the last machines to switch (because pro users are going to be more gun-shy about new architectures, and because Mac's chips are untested in the real world with such massive performance requirements.)
But the first thing they did for developers was to create an Apple Silicon based Mac Mini! Hmm... Did the mini prove it's usefulness? Will Apple embrace the mini now? They probably could have used a standard iMac instead. *shrug* But since they have already 'done it', they could just continue it...
 
But the first thing they did for developers was to create an Apple Silicon based Mac Mini! Hmm... Did the mini prove it's usefulness? Will Apple embrace the mini now? They probably could have used a standard iMac instead. *shrug* But since they have already 'done it', they could just continue it...
Making an AS based Mac Mini probably took the least effort to get something out the door. The Mini is useful to developers but does not otherwise sell in enough volume for Apple to pay much attention to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01 and MevetS
Sounds a bit too optimistic. More likely IMHO they’ll just demand them back and that will be that.
They are going to have to give them something they can continue to develop on, even if they make them buy it. I think they will need some sort of desktop system for developers, and I am guessing a Mac mini will be easier to release than a iMac or a Mac Pro, considering they basically have one now.
 
They are going to have to give them something they can continue to develop on, even if they make them buy it. I think they will need some sort of desktop system for developers, and I am guessing a Mac mini will be easier to release than a iMac or a Mac Pro, considering they basically have one now.
I remember reading somewhere that upon return there will be a credit given toward the purchase of an actual production ARM Mac. The Developer's Kit is why I think a ARM mini is aways away - its just too soon.
 
Making an AS based Mac Mini probably took the least effort to get something out the door. The Mini is useful to developers but does not otherwise sell in enough volume for Apple to pay much attention to it.
I don't know if anyone has taken it apart, but maybe they sort of just stuck an iPad logic board in and connected it to the rear panel ports (slightly simplified spoken).
 
They are going to have to give them something they can continue to develop on, even if they make them buy it. I think they will need some sort of desktop system for developers, and I am guessing a Mac mini will be easier to release than a iMac or a Mac Pro, considering they basically have one now.
My expectation is they will make them buy it, not provide a production AS Mac as a replacement for the DTK.

And I don’t think we should expect that Apple’s AS Mac roadmap and release plans are driven by what “will be easier to release”.

It’s certainly possible that an AS-based Mac mini will be amongst the first set of AS Macs released - I’m not arguing that it won’t - but if it is then it’s because it suits Apple’s strategic objectives to do that. But an AS-based Mac mini means the product will be judged on desktop-class performance and Apple may not want to start there. They may want to start at a lower end, with laptops (which also sell far better of course than Mac minis), and work up from there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01
Apple will no doubt start with the lower end laptops and maybe the low end iMacs. Tim cook said “over the next two years“ back in June so I think the AS Mac Pro could be released or at least announced at Apple’s 2022 WWDC but possibly sooner. That leaves quite a lot of time between then and late 2020 with the first AS Mac(s). So I’m thinking possibly fall to late 2021 for the AS Mac Mini some time after the higher end AS iMacs are released.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01
Apple will no doubt start with the lower end laptops and maybe the low end iMacs. Tim cook said “over the next two years“ back in June so I think the AS Mac Pro could be released or at least announced at Apple’s 2022 WWDC but possibly sooner. That leaves quite a lot of time between then and late 2020 with the first AS Mac(s). So I’m thinking possibly fall to late 2021 for the AS Mac Mini some time after the higher end AS iMacs are released.
IMHO the Mac Pro will be the last Mac to make the Intel to AS transition - that is such a specially market machine that Apple will want the OS to be as bug free as is possible. I doubt anyone is going to pulled the old "daughter board" apples used for the LC to allow it to run Apple II software natively out of mothballs.
 
Apple will no doubt start with the lower end laptops and maybe the low end iMacs. Tim cook said “over the next two years“ back in June so I think the AS Mac Pro could be released or at least announced at Apple’s 2022 WWDC but possibly sooner. That leaves quite a lot of time between then and late 2020 with the first AS Mac(s). So I’m thinking possibly fall to late 2021 for the AS Mac Mini some time after the higher end AS iMacs are released.
Next two years might mean 2021 and 2022. Then Apple can announce 31.12.2022, that there will be new mac pro at wwdc2023. And then the transition was over "over next two years". And then next MP might have a slight delay. Or they just cancel any future mac pros.
 
Next two years might mean 2021 and 2022. Then Apple can announce 31.12.2022, that there will be new mac pro at wwdc2023. And then the transition was over "over next two years". And then next MP might have a slight delay. Or they just cancel any future mac pros.
I doubt the Mac Pro will be cancelled.
Apple have put an awful lot of development into the 2019mp.
 
This story just appeared on the front page. :)

"Apple engineers are currently developing a new ‌Mac Pro‌ that looks like the current design at about half the size. It's unclear if that Mac will replace the current ‌Mac Pro‌ or if it's an additional model.

[...]

The new ‌Mac Pro‌ is not set to come out in 2020 and will presumably be released in 2021 or 2022."


 
half the size, double the price (of the current Mac Pro) 🙃

If the make a larger Mini Pro, can we get an Nano or Apple TV sized base Mini to balance it out ;)
 
They will. IMHO the Mac Mini (or some variation of it) will be around forever. I can only use a desktop computer. I have a KVM that I use for work so an iMac monitor is useless to me. I have tried docking a MacBook but it sucked.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.