I agree Bettman is trying to save face with the PA. I guess what I am really saying is that Torres has had multiple run-ins with the league-none of which have deterred his behavior. Was Torres an easy target to throw the book at? Absolutely.That said, if this was his 2nd or 3rd run-in, I would have no problems with the reduction. But this was FIFTH. At some point, someone has to throw down the hammer and do something.
And 25 is not unprecedented-
http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/16552/longest-nhl-suspensions
UPDATE-
I've been following that story too. I hope he pulls through okay.![]()
I think it's a terrible decision by Suter mostly, but Parise as well. The team is now cap strapped and not very good. You can't rely on 'prospect potential', as that means nothing. If it did, KC would win countless World Series. The team has no history, no winning tradition, and is in a small market mostly ignored by anyone outside of Minnesota.
Minnesota now has half its cap locked up in 5 players. What does this make them now? Maybe a contender for their division - maybe? So at best still looking at a 5-8 seed (and don't give me that 'LA just won as an 8!' nonsense).
They're probably a top 4 team in the west after this. Los Angeles and Vancouver are clearly the top of the pile, but Minnesota is probably right in there now with Chicago, St Louis, etc.
Exactly why they did it. These guys have a chance to go in and turn this franchise around. Parise is from Minnesota, and Suter is from Wisconsin (pretty close, and his wife is from Minnesota). It's a hockey hotbed in this country, and having a good NHL team there could be a huge thing for this league. You can't rely on prospect potential completely, but they have a bunch of great prospects. Adding these two guys in their prime is huge.
It kind of reminds me of the Bruins signing Chara and Savard a few years back. It didn't make them the instant favorite, but it strengthened the team greatly, and with a few other moves they were contenders and won it within 5 years.
These moves don't make Minnesota the favorites to win the cup by any means, but I think it definitely makes them a playoff team this year, and there's a good chance they make it deeper within 2-3 years.
Great signings and a great day for the league. Pumped for Minnesota, their fans deserve this.
They're probably a top 4 team in the west after this. Los Angeles and Vancouver are clearly the top of the pile, but Minnesota is probably right in there now with Chicago, St Louis, etc.
Top 4? Huge leap of faith.
1) Los Angeles - as long as they actually play to their potential
2) Vancouver
3/4/5 tier - (not in any order) Phoenix (w/ Doan), Chicago, St. Louis however you want to mix it.
6/7/8/9/10 tier - (not in any order) Minnesota, San Jose then throw in the likes of Dallas, Nashville (never count them out), Detroit, Colorado or Calgary maybe.
I can't see Minnesota cracking all of LA/Vancouver/Phoenix/Chicago/STL to be in the Top 4 - even with Phoenix's Doan situation or Chicago's goalie situation not settled. Maybe in a few years, but I don't play the speculation game.
About the deal(s) itself.....I just don't like it. I really don't like these front loaded 10+ year deals that end when the player is in their 40s. I kind of think of these deals as short-term self-preservation moves by the GMs. They're hoping for immediate and short-term improvement so that they can keep their jobs longer. Most GMs wouldn't last as long as these contracts, so they won't have to be the ones to worry about what to do with an old, possibly constantly injured (see: Dipietro, Rick), and possibly untradeable veteran player ten years from now.
Top 4? Huge leap of faith.
1) Los Angeles - as long as they actually play to their potential
2) Vancouver
3/4/5 tier - (not in any order) Phoenix (w/ Doan), Chicago, St. Louis however you want to mix it.
6/7/8/9/10 tier - (not in any order) Minnesota, San Jose then throw in the likes of Dallas, Nashville (never count them out), Detroit, Colorado or Calgary maybe.
I can't see Minnesota cracking all of LA/Vancouver/Phoenix/Chicago/STL to be in the Top 4 - even with Phoenix's Doan situation or Chicago's goalie situation not settled. Maybe in a few years, but I don't play the speculation game.
The Wild being a good team does nothing for the league. It's such a small market. Now if you were talking about the Rangers, the Flyers, the Bruins, the Kings, or the Blackhawks, your statement would make sense. Those big markets are the important ones for the league.
Minnesota used to have a strong team, and what happened? It did so much for the league that they moved to Dallas.
Minnesota (or Canada jr.) will always be a hockey hotbed, with or without the NHL.
About the deal(s) itself.....I just don't like it. I really don't like these front loaded 10+ year deals that end when the player is in their 40s. I kind of think of these deals as short-term self-preservation moves by the GMs. They're hoping for immediate and short-term improvement so that they can keep their jobs longer. Most GMs wouldn't last as long as these contracts, so they won't have to be the ones to worry about what to do with an old, possibly constantly injured (see: Dipietro, Rick), and possibly untradeable veteran player ten years from now.
I am a little confused. Is Weber actually an RFA? Could someone actually give him an insane offer sheet and force Nashville into a corner ? Why isnt he getting all kinds of offers for his services ?
That said he sounds like the girl who got dumped on prom night or the woman who was left at the alter and you know the saying-hell hath no furry like a d-partner screwed.
So where does Luongo end up?
I say Chicago since they have more pieces that are worthy , though Florida has more cap room.
So where does Luongo end up?
I say Chicago since they have more pieces that are worthy , though Florida has more cap room.
I hope not Chicago for their sake. Still think it would be funny if he went to the Leafs. Realistically, he should go play in Sweden or something.![]()
You think a guy who won 31 games out of the 55 he played this past season (with 5 shutouts) should pack it up and go to Sweden? Okay then.....
You must be forgetting that the Bruins/Canucks Cup final went to 7 games.....if he would have won one more game, your perception of him would be very different.
I think that Luongo has a lot of good hockey left in him. I even think he has the ability to rebound back to being considered one of the top goalies in the league. I just don't think he can do it in Vancouver. I think having Schneider there looking over his shoulder for the past few seasons hasn't helped or motivated him. It probably made him "squeeze the stick" more than he should have been, which led to his inconsistent play.
Whether he goes to Toronto, Chicago, or Florida, I think he'll do well. I wouldn't be upset if he became a Leaf.
I just dont think Florida has the pieces to move him. Vancouver isn't gonna just hand him over-its gonna take some major pieces. Frankly the price that Columbus wants for Nash is more in line with what Luongo is worth and Florida just does not have those pieces(and even if they did they wont part with them).The Sweden thing was more of a joke, but lets be realistic. Luongo can't handle the pressure of a big hockey market. If the Canucks had played Schneider for one more game in that series, things would have most definitely been different. Luongo gave up 20 goals in that 7 game series (for the record, Thomas gave up 8). That's not very good.
He's not a bad goalie by any means, but he folds when there is more pressure on him. A backup playing better should put the pressure on the starter and make him play better, too. It shouldn't be an excuse for the starter playing worse and getting demoted by the end of the year.
Florida seems like the best place for him. I think I remember reading that he lives down there in the offseason, and it would be a low pressure market where he would probably be very successful.