Hi there,
Please help me to see more clearly….
Do I have a "read performance" problem with my EVO 840 or not?
I upgraded my EVO 840 1TB. Purchased it 2 years ago, installed it in my MacPro as 2nd SSD. But I never used it (Main SSD was a 840 Pro 512GB in PCIe position).
Since my "original MAC SSD" from 2011 (Kingston 512GB) is only SATA II and now 4 years old, filled with about 370 GB, I decided to use the 840 EVO 1TB (Which was already dissembled since some months) in an MBP 2012. Backuped the Kingston SSD, then Cloned the Kingston on the EVO, put it in the MBP and upgraded the newest Samsung Firmware using the ISO-DVD-RW method. Which worked fine. The "Performance restoration part" either didn´t work or was very rapid (no old data existing on the EVO).
Restarted, no Problem. Let the MBP in idle state during night.
(I know, you are still waiting for the problem, but just one second..)
Performance test with Black Magic Speed test was very pleasant: writes 488/sec, Reads 511/s.
BUT when I installed (without problems) TrimEnabler, I was tempted to run also THEIR Performance test.
In ALL performance levels write and rewrite was nearly 500/s - BUT: READS are shown constantly near the zero-level - only ONE single time (the second try of about 10 times) it showed about 450/s Reads and rests since near Zero ( will say about 20-30).
Well - never treat numbers, but only problems….
My MBP opens very fast Apps and large files with big raw-Photos.
Starting my MBP takes about 40 sec.
But sometimes there is (just for some seconds) the "ball of death".
What do you think about the enormous difference of the results got by Blackmagic and Trim Enabler?
Is it just nothing and shows only the lack of coherence between such tests and different methods and algorithms or is it something to think seriously about?
I am NOT a "Performance- addicted" person - I just want to be shure that I will not run into problems soon - because I depend at the moment on this MBP for professional work...
Trim Enabler says everything "seems to be super" and Disk Utility confirms that the EVO has NO issues.
There are a lot of disk permission errors (mostly % with iTunes) which I treated with the repair function.
Nothing changed the enormous difference between the two "Read-Performance results" nor the nearly equal (good) Write-performance-results.
Question:
1) Is it just NOTHING to bother about or should I prevent something?
2) Would a "clean install" be useful?
I am still under OSX 10.8.5 on a MBP 9,1 2,3 MHz with 16 GB RAM.
Thank you very much in advance.