Does that mean no iWatch because of the same reasons?
iWatch wouldn't go into production until after announced since it is a new product.
Does that mean no iWatch because of the same reasons?
Agree with the OP.
Apple won't cannibilize iPhone sales by releasing two new models sizes.
.
So it wasn't best for Apple's best interest to release two brand new
or does this logic only apply to iPhones?
- iPads at the same time?
- Macbook Airs?
- Macbooks?
- iMacs?
And why not?
Alternatively, the second customer wants something bigger than 4.7". Apple doesn't have one (because, apparently, it's not in their best interest). So customer goes elsewhere and gives that revenue to Samsung or one of the other players. How does "best interest" reconcile with needlessly giving business away to key competitors?
- Customer wants to buy a 4.7" iPhone. Apple has one and collects the money.
- Customer wants to buy a 5.5" iPhone. Apple has one and collects the money.
The iPad mini says hello.
Again. People fail to under the iPad mini.
iPad mini was released along size with iPad 4 in Oct/November 2012. iPad 4 was a minor refresh. iPad mini new product.
If apple were to do the same thing.
The would release an iPhone 5S S (2014) model with same 4 inch display but faster processor along with a new iPhone (different display size).
Apple did not release a redesigned iPad (body style like iPad Air) with the iPad mini (non retina).
And for 2013. They just updated the iPad mini retina (retina screen/same size) with new redesign iPad Air.
I think the point here is, that, every time someone thinks Apple wouldn't do something, they did. Verizon wouldn't get the iPhone....they did. Apple wouldn't release a phone larger than 3.5'......they did. Apple wouldn't release a smaller size iPad.....They did. Then Apple did something else that many people didn't expect, they released 2 iPhone models in the same year. They released both the iPad 3 and iPad 4 in the same year.
I think the point here is, that, every time someone thinks Apple wouldn't do something, they did. Verizon wouldn't get the iPhone....they did. Apple wouldn't release a phone larger than 3.5'......they did. Apple wouldn't release a smaller size iPad.....They did. Then Apple did something else that many people didn't expect, they released 2 iPhone models in the same year. They released both the iPad 3 and iPad 4 in the same year.
The iPad mini says hello.
You forget even Samsung isn't stupid not to cannibalize sales of their own Galaxy phones. They don't release Galaxy Note and Galaxy S series at the same time either.
All of the products you mentioned had actual leaked parts.
Production of the 5.5" iPhone hasn't started yet.
Production of the 5.5" iPhone hasn't started yet.
Besides, who really cares? It makes me laugh that people get all bent out of shape over this rumor.
Personally, I hope Apple DOES release a 5.5" iPhone. AND that they give the 5S a little refresh. I want to see:
iPhone Mini
iPhone Air
iPhone Pro
And do away with the idiotic numbering in the name.
Seems pretty convincing to me. I'd say we have part leaks.Chinese rumor blog Apple Daily has acquired photos of what it claims are the next-generation iPhone, including the 5.5-inch model weve seen much less of in recent weeks. The two photos above show the larger device (with the purple interior) paired with a 4.7-inch version.
The larger model, which Apple Daily claims will be called iPhone 6L also sports a larger 2915mAh battery (seen below), compared to the 1810mAh in the 4.7-inch device and 1560 mAh in the iPhone 5s.
Part of the iPhone 6L display panel, which features a similar design to the 4.7-inch variant with more rounded corners, is shown off in one of the photos. Other internal components, including the logic board for both handsets, are on display in the photos below:
![]()
![]()
Just heard from my friend who has a friend that is friends with an apple tech in Cupertino and heard the 5.5" model will have expandable memory. You heard it from me first.