Wwhat was wrong with Clarksons reviews of the Fiesta and the Twingo.
errr
nothing... what do you think I was hinting at.
the actual answer to your question, is because it'd be boring.
Given what I wrote, you do realise that this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, to the point where I'm
wondering whether you actually read what I said.
I don't want to relax on a Sunday evening watching sensible review of a sensible car.
I
wonder no more, this just confirms it.
I thought episode 5 of this series was almost the absolute perfect balance of content, I
really did
thoroughly enjoy it, you had the silliness of the Touareg piece, the utterly pointless but still enjoyable attempt
(and subsequent failure) at maxing the new Veyron,
proper stars in a reasonably priced car, and though glaring with mistakes, a reflective sequence on Senna
the only thing that could've arguably made it any better is if they'd have managed to squeeze the 458 piece in, but then of course they'd have been no point to watching the final show then.
Contrast that to the utterly dreadful and dismal first show of the series
or the general filler material of some of the other episodes, the wedding piece was terminally dull, I freely admit to chuckling at the camping episode, though I think they dragged it out a little, and the ending was a bit
blah. And after show 5, 6 just /\/\_/\__/\_______________________________________________________
flatlined for me.
But I'll also stick to my general view that it's
"Amazing what difference having solid content can make, the rest of the series has suffered dreadfully in that respect. I've always thought that Top Gear has enough decent content to make 2 maybe 3 excellent shows per series rather than cobbling together some dreadful dross in an attempt to fill out 6 shows." and I think that episode 5 demonstrated that perfectly.