psycho bob said:
Have you actually spent any amount of time in the new XK?
It's actually funny you should mention that, I was given a tour of the Whitley plant (my Mum lives in Whitley, I'm there at the moment) not only 2 weeks ago, by a good friend (though I do actually have relatives that work there, Peugeot too, hey I'm a Coventry Kid after all) that I was at University with (he studied car design).
And though I haven't yet driven one (can't say I'm all that bothered if I do actually) I did get to sit in one, and I maintain my original opinion that the interior is...
iGav said:
f**kin' shameful for a £60k car, real ALBA hi-fi quality stuff.
And I told him that too
psycho bob said:
The interior quality leaves the Aston in the dust and that's before you get to overall reliability. The top of the line Alpine stereo is worth the price of admission alone just a slight step up from Alba
I'm no fan of Aston Martin that's for sure (see earlier in this thread), I'm most critical of their failure to take risks with their exterior design language for example.
But... I disagree that the interior of the new XK leaves the DB9 or indeed the Vantage in the dust.
Both of those models exhibit a rare attention to detail with regards to not only the overall aesthetic, but also the choice of materials in which it is realised... both of which seem completely absent in the XK's interior.
An example is the differences in how Aston and Jaguar have approached the way in which they integrate the Sat-Nav screen, in the Aston the screen is hidden when not in use (itself forming part of a beautiful single piece of wood) Or the attention to detail that can be found in the starter/power button, itself formed in crystal, but exhibiting similar characteristics, functionality and behaviour to the power button found on Macs, compare this to how Jaguar solved these problems, NO such attention to detail and design can be found ANYWHERE in the XK interior.
My comments regarding ALBA, are not to be intended to be taken in reference to the in car hi-fi

but as a general comment regarding the poor quality of plastics used in the interior, the lack of cohesive, innovative design and the general archaic feel to the interior.
psycho bob said:
it is like TG magazine pointed out the XK's interior and computer interface was designed by a mac user the Germans all use Windows.
Do you mind if I vehemently disagree with you on this one. heh

, I know of NO car company that approaches interior design to anywhere near the levels of detail that Audi do for example, (maybe Volvo occasionally, especially with the S40/V50 but that was a high point, the rest of the range falls somewhat flat).
The XK interior is archaic, gaudy and poorly realised... littered with switches in ergonomically poor or just plain aesthetically displeasing positions that offer a poor visual counterpoint (buttons by the door handles, steering wheel buttons for example).
The centre console functionality has been so poorly integrated, that aesthetically speaking... the design itself completely fails to visually intergrate at any level with the interior in which it is placed (see how the DB9 interior solves this problem, with the integrated CD slot, billet dials, hidden screen etc) which further exacerbates the overall lack of quality and attention to detail.
psycho bob said:
I make no bones about it I am a life long Jag fan
And there's nothing wrong with that fella.
psycho bob said:
Aston's hold no appeal for me what so ever
They don't for me either, though I can appreciate the lengths they went to, regarding the interior design of the DB9 and V8 Vantage, especially considering the Vanquish is arguably the worst interior, or any car ever. heh.