I like what Alison Hayslip said on G4TV:
"it maybe Verizon's service and 3G coverage that may turn out to be the DROID's killer app"
I wish t-mobile had better 3g service
I like what Alison Hayslip said on G4TV:
"it maybe Verizon's service and 3G coverage that may turn out to be the DROID's killer app"
No I am not but I have pointed out taht most of the time when people want to do it they are being rude and not really listening.
As for a reason for Verizon not to currently allow it. Well one reason is it provides a lot room for phones on there network. AT&T set 3G requires 4 channels per phone to be lock up compared to Verizon 2 channels.
The 4 channels for ATT are
1. Data Send
2. Data Receive
3. Voice Send
4. Voice receive.
Compared to Verizon
1. Send
2. Receive
So as it stand Verizon set up allows more phones to be on a given tower at any one time.
I was more pointing out and calling those 2 on rude behavior on a phone. Mindless surfing the web while on the phone is not an excuse and is rude.
The biggest people saying that it is sucks that it not there want it to be rude but do not come up with a reason on the few times that it more than a minor inconveniences and could not be worked out over the phone.
Thankfully, you're not Ms. Manners, and there are other reasons for wanting voice and data to work simultaneously.Mindless surfing the web while on the phone is not an excuse and is rude.
funny how many of you use simultaneous data as a reason why the carrier and it's devices suck, but most ran and bought the original iPhone and never complained and even defended those who said 3G was a necessity. oh the irony![]()
I am certain there are posters here who are defending AT&T because it's affiliated with Apple, while there are minority who do experience reliable service. My experience traveling to major metropolitan hubs is that the service has been atrocious.
ATT has already released their weak comeback but it's too little too late once they lost their legal battle to have the commercials removed. Verizon aint cheap but you're paying for reliable service. It's the same reason why people come back to Apple computers rather than some of the cheap PC competitors
funny how many of you use simultaneous data as a reason why the carrier and it's devices suck, but most ran and bought the original iPhone and never complained and even defended those who said 3G was a necessity. oh the irony![]()
Funny, I recall many people complaining (loudly and publicly) about the limitations of the iPhone on EDGE in that pre-3G year.
And equating a weakness of Verizon today with an AT&T/iPhone weakness of yesterday seems a bit silly. It was like when people were defending Vista by comparing it to the original OS X release. "Sure, Vista may suck, but remember OS X 10.0? Wow!"
I must be one of the minority who have never had a problem with AT&T service. I am no fan of AT&T (or any carrier for that matter) but the lack of any truly compelling devices (to the non-tech blog-reading nerd) on Verizon speaks for itself.
You never seem to have a problem leveraging a similar argument when discussing appstores in their nascence.
That's because I'm comparing an existing product (Apple's app store) with app stores that do not yet exist or exist in a very rudimentary form right now.
Completely rational.
You're doing essentially the opposite by comparing a current weakness of an Apple competitor (Verizon) with an Apple weakness that no longer exists (the pre-3G iPhone).
Completely irrational.
BTW, Verizon and ATT compete. Verizon doesnt compete with Apple unless apple became a carrier recently...
Now you're being extra silly. Of course you can provide iPhone numbers... it's been three years.
But at the time, no one knew how many first model iPhones were sold until Apple's and ATT's earning calls a few weeks later. Everyone used estimates at first.
So since all we have are Droid estimates (between 100K and 250K), you're jumping the gun to directly compare numbers.
In any case, considering the first iPhone had six months' worth of huge hype preceding its launch, versus a week or so of slight ads for Droid, the Droid seems to have done very well.
So you're saying that you think the first iPhone was a failure because it had ZERO third party app storage available? Oh wait... it didn't fail after all.
The Android app limit still allows hundreds of apps, along with their data on the SD card. And I hear that the whole scheme is going to change anyway... just as the iPhone changed over time.
Yes, I'm sure Verizon had no demands of its own (namely over the software).
It looks like the "nothing to lose" carrier was the big winner in this deal.
Apple provided iphone numbers after the first weekend of the first iphones, how many Droids have been sold, why isn't Verizon providing us numbers or they have got something to hide. I guess they also won't provide numnbers just like Palm who to this date haven't told us the number of Pres they've sold.
Going by the statistics forwarded by analytics firm Flurry, the Google Android-based Verizons Motorola Droid is evidently the first notable iPhone challenger - with the first-week sales figures of the new smartphone reportedly standing at almost 250,000!
Flurry, a mobile applications specialist, noted that the opening-week sales figures of the Droid were much above T-Mobiles HTC myTouch 3G, though they were well below the Apple iPhone 3GS - while the former managed to sell 60,000 units in its debut week, the latter sold nearly 1.6 million.
However, the key difference between the Droid and iPhone sales figures is that while iPhone was released in eight countries, Droid was released in only one. Moreover, iPhone 3GS gained heavily from the existing base of iPhone users who upgraded from older versions.
The first-week Droid sales figures given by Flurry have further been substantiated by Mark McKechnie, of Broadpoint AmTech, who noted that 100,000 Droids were sold during the first weekend; as well as Macquaries Phil Cusick who reported 200,000 Droid sales in the opening weekend.
Commenting on the Droid figures, Peter Farago, Flurrys Marketing VP, wrote: The launch of Droid signals the beginning of a viable platform alternative to the iPhone. With Droid, Motorola has raised the bar for Android handsets, contributing to an ever-growing base of Android handsets upon which applications developers can build a business.
Absolutely. That's why I said Apple shares the blame. They undoubtedly were in the driver's seat with a weakened, insecure carrier, and extracted the best deal they could get -- their customers be damned.
Their tendency toward obsessive control -- which is so good for creating beautiful, powerful products -- is a little less good in their market (and after-market) practices.
But at least they create products that are beautiful and practical and inspiring -- which is why so many people are fanatics. The carriers, not so much...
I live in New Jersey, and the best carriers are as follows:
I've been a Verizon customer for a long time, but let's face it. For years, Verizon has been a controlling and manipulating company. Up until very recently, almost all of their phones have had that piss-poor VZ Navigator as the default interface.
- Verizon
- AT&T
- Sprint
- T-Mobile
But AT&T sucks for not upgrading their networks. Trust me, I've used AT&T as well and they are downright terrible. Dropped calls, ****** service, you name it. That's the only reason I (and most people) refused to switch to the iPhone.
Only recently has Verizon begun to offer better phones. If we were talking about Verizon phones last year, the best phone I could offer up would have been the Omnia. Meh.
AT&T, improve your ****** service instead of bitching about being sued. Verizon, stop your controlling and cry-baby tactics.
Enough said.
Those are not official numbers. Those are guesses, because Verizon or Motorola won't release numbers. If they released the damn numbers, we would have known by now. Reading that article, you have one person saying 250,000, another saying 100,000 and another saying 200,000. Which one is it?
I like what Alison Hayslip said on G4TV:
"it maybe Verizon's service and 3G coverage that may turn out to be the DROID's killer app"
You are in the minority. All carriers have some coverage issues but ATT's exceed my expectations continuously. Go to major metropolitan areas and their lack of bandwidth becomes obvious.
Those are not official numbers. Those are guesses, because Verizon or Motorola won't release numbers. If they released the damn numbers, we would have known by now. Reading that article, you have one person saying 250,000, another saying 100,000 and another saying 200,000. Which one is it?
Verizon does not have a habit of release phone sell information per weekend and they are not going to make any special case here.
Also note it is not Verizon job to do that. Apple has one advatage of getting officail sells numbers and that is apple force activation to go threw them which I think was in part so they could make it a media storm and add to the hype.
Since Verizon does not release that information and Motorola does not have it (they only have how many they sold to Verizon) it is not going to come out here just to give infomation to shut up apple fan boys who no matter what the number was would use it to scream Droid sucks. Sell sells suck when as another article pointed out 200k is really pretty good compared to the iPhone considering how many were upgrades, and sold world wide.
Please stop the bashing just because it is not released. If a company does not release that infomation on any of the other phones they sold they sure as hell are not going to do it here.
Yeah right, I guess nobody has the numbers. Keep lining up the excuses for Verizon. If they had sold many units, you would be assured they would be airing it out all over the press and in their commercials. Keep the excuses coming and you want to call others fanboys. Right now we don't know how many have been sold, it's going to be a guessing game just like with the Palm Pre.