I cannot see the misrepresentation that AT&T is complaining about. The whole Verizon commercial talks about 3G coverage and the map is clearly labeled "3G coverage". AT&T is all worried because it doesn't show EDGE coverage?? C'mon!
And I suspect Apple is secretly disgusted with AT&T and would love to open the iPhone up to rival carriers. They just have to be sure they can justify the cost of a new iPhone with different technology that would pretty much only work in the US on Verizon's network.
Meh. They all suck. Verizon has the slimiest business practices of any wireless carrier (e.g. disabling data transfer on the RAZR so that you are forced to download pictures through the Verizon network ... for a fee, of course).
AT&T may not have as good a coverage, but in my experience what this demonstrates is that having coverage across large swaths of unpopulated desert does not benefit many people. I rarely lose 3G coverage. :shrug:
Also worth noting ... I took my iPhone down to Loreto, Mexico a few weeks ago for a couple weeks and I had 3G coverage the entire time down there. What kind of coverage would I have had if I were a Verizon customer?
I was told that Verizon's 3G network is just for data. AT&T's carries both data and voice. (I could be wrong).
Personally, I haven't had any trouble with AT&T. Dropped calls are rare (once a month if that often). 3G Data is speedy. Edge is horrible, but my area is covered by 3G.
But I think Verizon will win this PR war.
And I suspect Apple is secretly disgusted with AT&T and would love to open the iPhone up to rival carriers. They just have to be sure they can justify the cost of a new iPhone with different technology that would pretty much only work in the US on Verizon's network.
Verizon's EVDO Rev A can't handle voice & data simultaneously. So, you can't be on a call and check your email at the same time, etc. AT&T's 3G does handle voice & data simultaneously. This is a big difference IMHO. That said, AT&T should just be concentrating on improving their existing 3G network and working diligently to have the best, most expansive 4G network.
AT&T needs to stop wasting time and money with its lawyers and instead focus on expanding it's 3G service. There is still no 3G service in the Asheville, NC area even though reps said that it would come late summer...then September..then November. I would SO switch to Verizon if I could get the iPhone on that network.
I knew that the maps in the commercial were for 3G coverage only. Because they actually say their 3G coverage, not total coverage (3G or not). But, to be fair to AT&T, I can see how people would think that the maps for for total coverage. Mainly because people practically never take the time to actually pay attention to what things say. I'm a techie where I work, & we have a color printer & a black & white printer in my office. I have a big sign on the color printer that says "This is the color printer" & a sign that says "This is the black & white printer" on the black & white printer. You won't believe how many people ask me "Is this the color printer? Or is it that one?" Reading: it makes life a whole lot easier.
Why doesn't AT&T come up with a commercial to combat Verizon's?
Why doesn't AT&T's commercial show a map of their total coverage compared to Verizon's total coverage? I bet AT&T has better coverage than Verizon.
You're kidding. So I can't be on a call and get an email from whomever I'm on the call with? Or look up something on the web or via a web App and tell the caller? I do that all the time. That would be a deal-breaker for me w/ Verizon, if that's the case.
It's a deal-breaker 'cause it is in fact the case with VZW. Then again, it was also the case with Edge which I was stuck on until we finally got 3G here two months ago.