Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"...and reportedly costs more than $15 million per episode, but as a vehicle to push Apple's own products, it could be worth tens of millions of dollars."

Let's see..."tens of millions" is likely 30-40 million...I'll call it 40 million. If each episode costs 15 million and I'm guessing there's gonna be 7 or more episodes, that would mean Apple is spending $105 million to hopefully sell $40 million in Apple products/services.

My overall view of Apple's jump into video/movie production is that it is a bad idea. Apple should have spent the time and money building a supreme streaming service 5+ years ago if they wanted to get involved in tv land. Steve Jobs died 8 years ago and he/Apple had been talking about creating a great tv experience. It seems Apple couldn't figure out how to create a streaming service so after 8+ years they decided to change gears and just write their own tv shows for their own new service that, well, only shows Apple-produced shows.

Apple should (should have) work on other projects such as new hardware products and great updates to existing hardware. I have no idea why Apple never capitalized on Facetime when it could have been revolutionary in video calling or even just the audio portion to allow traditional telephone calling. My mom uses a Tracfone which has a preset # of minutes she can talk. Therefore, we talk most of the time via Facetime while other people call her Tracfone. Facetime saves her a bundle of money. There might not be a lot of money in Facetime, but Apple could have sold Facetime video products that sit on your counter or stripped down iPod Touches that only do Facetime. Moreover, as Facetime caught on more and more, people would have been exposed to more of Apple's products and services helping to cross-sell and up-sell Apple gear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ingik and cardfan
One reason more to stay away from Apple TV+. I pay for streaming services to watch movies and series in an ad-free environment.

Though it looks like product placement is nearly ubiquitous by now. When I watched Avengers Endgame (a movie which I otherwise loved as a hardcore Marvel fanboy), I really hated that stupid Audi commercial with Tony Stark and Steve Rogers (if you saw the movie, you'll know which scene I am referring to). I thought they should just cut to a commercial break - it would have had nearly the same effect.
 
I like the shows that I 've subscribed. Finished Morning Show, See, and now watching Dickinson. Next the elephant queen. At first I did not get a kick out of The Morning Show and See but then just said let me go to episode two and for both, was hooked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
Ha, it's hilarious that the MacBooks are not even facing the correct direction for the people to be using them in the two pictures posted in the article. I know I always keep the backside of the computer facing me when it's sitting on my desk....

No, they are facing correct direction, check it again. Stem on logo is always facing the user when you close the MacBook.
 
Ha, it's hilarious that the MacBooks are not even facing the correct direction for the people to be using them in the two pictures posted in the article. I know I always keep the backside of the computer facing me when it's sitting on my desk....
Sorry but you're wrong,
They actually are facing the correct direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: felixen
I imagine it’s balanced out in the other shows like “See” & “For All Man Kind”. Which are all set pre-Apple.
 
Is this really surprising given how much we see Apple products in other programming. Their stuff is everywhere. Should we be surprised that it’s more prevalent in their own programming. Tell me about iPhones in See or Dickinson and then we’ve got a problem.
 
“Some viewers may consider the flagship series to be overzealous in its product placement, but the very fact that Apple is able to promote its hardware in a subscription service that was designed to help lessen the company's dependency on its iPhone business at a time of slowing sales, is a sweet sort of irony.“

The product placement is on a service where the viewers already have iPhones for the most part (free trial). Besides this is a play to help iPhone.

Apple has 1.4 billion devices. But iPhones, iPads, and macs make up the vast majority of those. Box streaming (Apple TV) is basically nonexistent for Apple. Apple TV is in last place and falling. There’s a reason Apple made an app for Roku and amazon. Apple was in danger of being left out.

Atv+ by itself is a loser. But they needed to do something to remain relevant in video. Feeding a cash burner like atv+ gives them a chance.

Apple has known for years they need to make a play in video. This feels like plan z or something after years of talking to content providers. They waited so long that it feels like amateur hour at Apple as roku and amazon (and Netflix) gobbled up the streaming market.

The same is happening in HomeKit. Speakers. As Apple sits by and does nothing. HomePod was limited but no follow up. Apple TV is struggling in last place with no further effort except for a lousy update. Usability and customer experience are discarded as selling content is the new focus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericinboston
Did not see an Apple products in the first episode of "See" but maybe it was because the script was so bad I turned it off after 20 minutes. Or maybe there was a more obvious reason? Gorgeous production, but terrible script.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet
I don’t see the issue here. Many employees in a business use Apple laptops. Many people check their phones in the morning. It’s not they are advertising it in a Script: “You should get Apple products”.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.