Damn the battery pack is almost bigger than the phoneI really like this setup. Magsafe battery pack resolves low battery capacity but iphone 12 series overheats. 13 mini is considerably better.
Damn the battery pack is almost bigger than the phoneI really like this setup. Magsafe battery pack resolves low battery capacity but iphone 12 series overheats. 13 mini is considerably better.
I bet but it only matters to Apple how it does compared to their usual volumeAlso, any other vendor would have absolutely loved a phone that sold in the volumes that the mini did.
These are the facts, quite obviously.The iPhone mini failed because the people on MacRumors' forums are a poor representational sample of the larger consumer population.
I love my 13 mini, but what you are saying is correct regarding Social Media usage in these age groups. What's even more worrying is that flagship phones with 5000 Mh batteries (like my partners S21 Ultra) are not even enough. She frequently has to charge her phone at least twice a day (sometimes 3 times) just based on her TikTok usage.These are the facts, quite obviously.
And yet MR members will not acknowledge what age groups represents the largest number of iPhones owners, a demographic that “coincidentally” is the one that ranks the highest in SOT, highest in internet addiction of any age group, most time in front of devices, displays, consumer electronics, etc.
44% of iPhone owners are aged 16-24
34% are aged 25-34
13% aged 35-45
and the remaining 9% are older than 45.
Any of you who genuinely think any brand can sell a smartphone in 2023 and beyond that has a 5.4” display with a 2227-2406 mAh battery when Apple itself is selling a smartphone for $100 more that has 3227 mAhs and a 6.1” display needs to get out of their bubble or adopt some kids or teenagers, or talk to the ones that aren’t living at home anymore.
What do you think people aged 16-34 spend most of their waking hours doing?
And there’s your answer why iPhone mini was a mistake and could never have worked regardless of how high it was spec’ed.
-As long as Apple and other brands offer >5.4” smartphones with >2406 mAhs batteries for just a few hundred dollars more there will be no <5.4” smartphones outselling the >5.4” ones. No way, no how. Not happening.
TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Twitch is what’s happening on smartphones and an increasingly larger part of young people’s lives.
Those things require as much juice as possible and are way more pleasant to navigate on a bigger display vs. a smaller.
iPhones mini were DOA, regardless of battery size, finishes, RAM, design, display quality, OLED or LCD, etc.
iPhones mini simply don’t fit the demands of the current smartphone market.
As short and crude as this is, you are 100% on the money.Like you icon?
More likely poignant insight... The fact is we are in a hamburger eating SUV driving world where "BIGGAH IS BETTAH"... Hell my next monitor is going to be a 57" Samsung Ultrawide..
Absolutely, just making that point though when people say they didn't sell well. It is comparative.I bet but it only matters to Apple how it does compared to their usual volume
Yeah, my 12 mini overheats when in the sun. But so does my ipad 🤷🏻♀️I really like this setup. Magsafe battery pack resolves low battery capacity but iphone 12 series overheats. 13 mini is considerably better.
As a 13 mini owner I drive an electric car I bought at about the same time. The car battery lasts more than a week of daily driving without charging 😀I wonder how many of us Mini enthusiasts fall into other similar niches, like still driving a manual transmission, for instance (I very much dislike automatic transmissions)
Isn't it possible that it is difficult to put the pro equipment in a mini and the battery life is ridiculously low due to lack of space for much battery along with more power hungry electronics/camera/screen? As with many things Apple doesn't do , it is based on too many trade-offs.For a company with its finger on the pulse in so many ways, the glaring error they made with the mini is pretty unforgivable.
It needed a pro offering, or at least a telephoto lens in the camera stack. The 0.5x lens is worthless to most people and the 1.0x is O.K. - now they’ve released the iPhone 15 with a 2x telephoto, which is _exactly_ what the mini needed.
I’m a long time upgrader and iPhone only photographer, and despite my frustrations at having been pushed out of the pro camera range, I don’t see myself moving on from the 13 mini for a long time because of Apple’s obsession with the idea that someone who wants a smaller device can’t possibly be interested in pro features. It’s maddening.
But of course you of all people would know...Don’t be so ridiculous. If they didn’t want it to succeed, they wouldn’t do it, they’re not out to pointlessly spend money. Apple are about making money and the phone did not make enough of it. Simple.
You mean country, not world.Like you icon?
More likely poignant insight... The fact is we are in a hamburger eating SUV driving world where "BIGGAH IS BETTAH"... Hell my next monitor is going to be a 57" Samsung Ultrawide..
Grateful if you link the source of this info.44% of iPhone owners are aged 16-24
34% are aged 25-34
13% aged 35-45
and the remaining 9% are older than 45.
I hope the Plus line won’t be eliminated like the mini.
That already exists. It’s called the iPhone SE.It's much simpler to say the reason they weren't selling is because of price.
Make a simpler mini with one camera for $399![]()