Cause they never need it attached to an external monitor?Why would someone buy a MBP without HDMI…
Cause they never need it attached to an external monitor?Why would someone buy a MBP without HDMI…
If M2 is released next month it will be based on A15 but may well be using an improved TSMC 4nm process, which is apparently already in high-volume manufacturing. If it comes out in Q3/Q4 it could be using A16.I wonder if M2 will be based on A15 or A16 core architecture.
All rumours point to at least some iMacs being released later this year (June?). But otherwise I agree, just finish the M1/Pro/Max line in 2 events now and bring A16 + M2 after the summer.It would a pleasant surprise (and logical) to see an M1 Pro/Max iMac and high-end Mini released next month. That would complete the standard M1 lineup, with the MacPro being something specialised that may be based on some multi-chiplet design using M1 cores.
Apple could also introduce one or two entry level devices (MBP13 & iMac 24) at the same event. That would avoid the potential head-scratching of M2 coming out before the M1 rollout was finished.
I don't think we'll see M2 Pro/Max this year, and the introduction of an M2 16 months after M1 would hopefully indicate that the release cadence is likely to be at least 16-18 months for the Pro/Max machines. This is long enough to deter most people from just "waiting for the next one around the corner".
Isn't that the exact same argument for including ports? That some people need them?Because not everyone needs it.
That would Make sense to me. I imagine there would be more interest in an iMac or Mini with M1 Pro/Max that minor spec updates to M2 in the entry-level machine without any redesign. That would would be a bit underwhelming apart from demonstrating that Apple can produce a new M-series chip within 18 months....good to know, but not very exciting as a product release.All rumours point to at least some iMacs being released later this year (June?). But otherwise I agree, just finish the M1/Pro/Max line in 2 events now and bring A16 + M2 after the summer.
The original question wasn't about ports being good/bad/handy for most etc., but "Why would someone buy a MBP without HDMI…" and then the answer is simply OK.Isn't that the exact same argument for including ports? That some people need them?
As I've pointed out many times, there is no such thing as a USB-C substitute for a flush-fitting USB-A flash drive (the type that look like an RF mouse dongle).
In my extremely unrealistic wishlist, I wish Apple would include USB-A and Mavericks, IMO the last workhorse version of Mac OS—and much nicer to look at, too. Along with an M-chip, nothing could beat it. With two Thunderbolt ports, a garish OS that even worse has terrible built-in apps, a lot of "no regression bugs" that haven't been fixed over countless versions of Mac OS . . . well it's why this year I'm going to give Windows a try on a Lenovo X1 Carbon Gen 10 when it comes out.
Philosophically, I don't think ports should be relegated to "pros."
Ports are not professional. They are utilitarian. And all users use their computers for utilitarian purposes, now more than ever someone who buys a computer is probably buying it for productivity/work over just media consumption, or they would just use their smartphone or tablet otherwise. I don't see anything "pro" about a person having a camera that has an SD card or having hard drives that use USB-A or heaven forbid an older person who still likes to print things to read them and has a USB printer sitting around. The "pro" port is Thunderbolt. That's the one where I don't really see "entry level" application, and yet it's the only one available on the lower-cost models. Relegating SD cards and other ports for computers that start at $2,000 to designate them as pro is just silly. It's not a more premium feature or feature for more advanced users; it's a utilitarian feature that the "common folk" have been using for decades with their computers. Apple will often simplify things (like their failed experiment with Documents in the Cloud because they thought a file manager was too confusing for people) so that they create a worse, more confusing experience, forgetting that people are generally competent and have been using computers for decades—and that they like computers because they are computers.
It was technically impressive and practically useless.As long as the Touch Bar is gone for good, it'll be an immediate massive upgrade. That thing was straight trash.
Your suggestion would create more confusion into what an M1 Pro is. They already have one binned version. They don't need another one to muddy the waters further. The M2 and M1 Pro/Max are going to exist in the lineup at the same time anyway (M1 models will be refreshed before M1 Pro models), so the differences will still need to be communicated and understood.Why does everyone expect MBP 13" to come with M2 chip? If Apple puts brand new M2 into old design MPB 13" before announcing the rest M1 Pro/Max iMacs, it'll just create more questions in product lineups, will continue with the "Air has the same power, don't buy MBP", will not justify $1500 and is simply not good enough for M2 introduction.
Just take M1 Pro, offer only 8 core binned CPU, bin GPU cores to 10/12, remove touch bar and put $1499 on it. And never again use non-Pro cpu in Pro machine like with M1 (necessary then, not anymore).
Love it. Exactly. MR is now the Schultz Brigade!Why do I think of Sgt. Schultz with this 13" MBP rumor
Keeping Pro level separated from low end/regular solves the confusion, not create it - the M1 non-Pro chip in MBP is the main problem that actually "muddies the waters".Your suggestion would create more confusion into what an M1 Pro is. They already have one binned version. They don't need another one to muddy the waters further. The M2 and M1 Pro/Max are going to exist in the lineup at the same time anyway (M1 models will be refreshed before M1 Pro models), so the differences will still need to be communicated and understood.
Fact of the matter is that Apple only needs to have one 13" laptop, and following a redesign I expect that's what we'll see. The only surprising thing for me is that the 13" MBP is getting refreshed at all.
Yes!!!!! The Touch Bar stays in production. I love the Touch Bar.
Apple refreshes the MacBook Pro models on a regular basis, and in 2022, we could potentially see new versions of the 13-inch MacBook Pro and the higher-end 14-inch and 16-inch versions. Rumors suggest a new 13-inch model could come as soon as spring, while we haven't heard much at all about a refresh of the larger models given that they just launched in October 2021.
![]()
For now, this guide focuses on the 13-inch MacBook Pro that we're expecting to see refreshed first, but it will be updated as we hear more about all of the MacBook Pro models.
13-Inch MacBook Pro
Apple last refreshed the entry-level 13-inch MacBook Pro in November 2020 when it debuted the first M1 Macs. It came out alongside the MacBook Air and the M1 Mac mini, and all three product lines are due for an update.
Design
Rumors suggest the 13-inch MacBook Pro will see no design updates, continuing to feature the same chassis with a Touch Bar, a feature that has been eliminated from the higher-end 14-inch and 16-inch machines. Not all rumors have agreed on the Touch Bar, however, as Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has suggested that Apple will remove it.
![]()
Given the lower cost, the updated 13-inch MacBook Pro will not include a mini-LED display, nor is it expected to support 120Hz ProMotion refresh rates.
![]()
With no design changes, the biggest change coming to the 13-inch MacBook Pro will be the updated M2 chip.
M2 Chip
Since the launch of the M1, Apple has been working on a followup, which will presumably be called the "M2." The M2 is expected to have the same 8-core CPU as the M1, but there will be speed and efficiency improvements as it could be built on a smaller node.
As for GPU improvements, it will have additional GPU cores. 9 and 10-core GPU options are expected to be available, up from the 7 and 8-core GPU options available in the original M1. The M2 will not be as powerful as the M1 Pro and the M1 Max, which will be succeeded by the M2 Pro and M2 Max.
Apple is expected to use the M2 chip in the updated 13-inch MacBook Pro and the 2022 MacBook Air.
14-Inch and 16-Inch MacBook Pro
The 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models came out in November 2021, and we haven't heard much about new models at this point in time. Apple presumably won't go for a design refresh because the 2021 models had a new look with mini-LED display, but we can count on new chips.
We don't know what to expect just yet, but forthcoming 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models will likely use the future M2 Pro and M2 Max chips.
Release Timelines
Rumors out of the Apple supply chain from both DigiTimes and a Chinese source that previously provided accurate information on Apple's MacBook Pro models have suggested that Apple could introduce the 13-inch MacBook Pro at its spring event, which is expected to take place on Tuesday, March 8.
If accurate, we'll be seeing the M2 chip as soon as March, which is earlier than previously suggested. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has said that Apple has a new 13-inch MacBook Pro in the works, but he has not provided specific information on a release date.
Guide Feedback
Have questions about Apple's 2022 MacBook Pro plans, see something we left out, or want to offer feedback on this guide? Send us an email here.
Article Link: There's a New 13-Inch MacBook Pro Coming, Here's What We Know
What can you do on Marvericks that you cannot do on Monterey. Apart from running 32 bits apps, everything is available.IMO the last workhorse version of Mac OS—and much nicer to look at, too.
The original question wasn't about ports being good/bad/handy for most etc., but "Why would someone buy a MBP without HDMI…" and then the answer is simply OK.
There's a space between $1K Air 13" and $2K 14"+, that would offer fine in-between more Pro machine - Pro power and accelerator options from above, form/size from bellow. The current MBP 13" doesn't do that, so it couldn't sit in the middle with M1 from bellow and most people don't know why bother with such unfortunate placement.Genuinely curious what the purpose of this machine would be?
We already have the 14” pro with all the features someone needing power would need and the air for portability at lower performance.
Why would anyone pay for a 13” when an air will either meet your needs or you spring for the pro?
Other than 3 option selling or unless this is going to be like the SE version of the MacBook I really don’t see the point of this machine.
The TouchBar may have been great for some workflows. It made my workflows significantly worse. My 13 inch MacBook Pro 2019 with TouchBar was my least favourite Mac ever. I didn’t expect it’s usability to be so bad. I’ve recently moved over to a M1 MacBook Air and haven’t looked back or missed that MacBook Pro at all.
I very much expect the upcoming iMac to be based on M1 Pro/Max, and I can't dream up a scenario where they can release M1 based machines after or at the same time as the "next gen" product, even if it is the smaller "non-Pro" variant, and communicate that well to the customer. No matter what M2 will be based on (A15, A16, N5, N4) it will be faster in single core performance by some margin. Confirming M2 "exists" already would potentially make iMac customers wait for the M2 Pro / Max rather than buying obsolete hardware. And I cannot imagine they will debut the iMac on M2 Pro / Max half a year after they just introduced them for the MBP 14/16.