They're not strapping on hardhats with little lights looking for the code... they're simply choosing not to change it.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
These macOS Sonoma Features Are Not Available on Intel Macs
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yup. Apple Silicon's lack of compatibility with x86 Windows and the non-repairable design of modern Macs is making me want to switch to a Windows PC for my next computer. I'm buying a computer to use not the other way around.
AMD Ryzens have also gone a long way with regards to performance per watt.
PowerPC to Intel was worse I think for native Mac developers. Intel to ARM shouldn’t be too bad considering the wide support for it already for iOS and the fact that the endianness didn’t change this time. Companies are just lazy in nature. How many apps were 32 bits and changed only after macOS dropped it (preventing users from updating)? Even if it was deprecated for years and that 64 bits support for apps was there since Leopard at least (Tiger had some I think).It begins...
Now that all Macs are Silicon, those of us with any Intel Macs face numbered days even if there was still an Intel Mac for sale only 1 day ago.
Rosetta 2 is almost certainly on the same clock. See Rosetta 1 deprecation as a guide.
The many apps still needing to "throw that one switch and recompile for silicon"had better get with it. I presume it is a very heavy switch... as it seemed to be the last time we went through this (and a number of apps- including prominent ones did not seem to be able to lift that switch before Rosetta 1 ended).
Suggestion: anything mission critical means keeping an "old Mac" running an old macOS around. I still have a Snow Leopard Mac for a few key things that never "threw the switch."
For Rosetta 2, while I didn’t find actual sources to back it, I’ve read that it was mostly Apple’s work, while Rosetta 1 was licensed from another company. So they had a good incentive to remove it ASAP.
Well it is, i've been running WoA on all my Silicon macs, since Win10oA landed, yes through parallels and now also VMWare. And at least through Parallels (as they were first) there is no performance loss as far as I can see, when one configures it the right way.
But now it's really up to Microsoft to release WoA officially for dual boot purposes, that's up to them. Apple isn't standing in the way here. Like at all. I mean, If Linux could figure it out, without any outside or inside support from Apple....
Surely MS should be able to pull it off too, no? And allow us to dual boot WoA together with macOS, like i'm running Asahi Linux on all my mac dual boot. I'd hope to have Windows join them one day and let me triple boot them all!
(though to be honest, I technically already triple boot a Macbook, as that runs Monterey, Asahi and now Sonoma all on the same M1.)
Oh also, as a side note, for the ppl who confuse apple stopping with supporting Intel macs for their operating systems with the possibility of Rosetta 2 going away soon too, rest easy:
That isn't likely to happen, not in the last place because there's still a **** ton of Intel mac software out there, which lickely will not all be ported, but also because Apple really has no reason too.
If anything, Rosetta 2 support on Silicon macs is here to stay for the long run, just because it makes switching from intel macs that much easier which means more ppl switching and around we go.
Also, Apple quietly updated Rosetta 2 too with Sonoma, it can now emulate/virtualise D3DX12, more commonly knows as DirectX 12.
So yeah, if Apple is gonna encourage devs to do game porting from Windows for Direct X 12 based games, Rosetta 2 ain't gonna move any time soon!
That isn't likely to happen, not in the last place because there's still a **** ton of Intel mac software out there, which lickely will not all be ported, but also because Apple really has no reason too.
If anything, Rosetta 2 support on Silicon macs is here to stay for the long run, just because it makes switching from intel macs that much easier which means more ppl switching and around we go.
Also, Apple quietly updated Rosetta 2 too with Sonoma, it can now emulate/virtualise D3DX12, more commonly knows as DirectX 12.
So yeah, if Apple is gonna encourage devs to do game porting from Windows for Direct X 12 based games, Rosetta 2 ain't gonna move any time soon!
Apple this week previewed macOS Sonoma, the latest version of its Mac operating system. Launching later this year, the software update includes several new features, but not all of them are available on Intel-based Macs, according to Apple.
On the macOS Sonoma features page, fine print indicates that the following features require a Mac with an Apple silicon chip:
Apple does not indicate why the features are not available on Intel Macs, but it likely relates to performance considerations, and only Apple silicon Macs have a Neural Engine for machine learning tasks. The last Intel Macs were released in 2020, and Apple has since moved to its own custom-designed processors. The transition to Apple silicon is now complete following this week's introduction of a new Mac Pro with the M2 Ultra chip.
- Presenter Overlay, a feature that displays the user on top of the content they are sharing in any video conferencing app.
- Game Mode, which prioritizes CPU and GPU performance while gaming by limiting the performance of background tasks.
- A new high-performance mode in the Screen Sharing app.
- The ability to pair Made for iPhone hearing devices directly with a Mac.
- The ability to invoke Siri by saying "Siri" instead of "Hey Siri."
macOS Sonoma will likely be released to the public in October and is compatible with Macs released in December 2017 and later.
Article Link: These macOS Sonoma Features Are Not Available on Intel Macs
a bit confused about the screen sharing feature-what happens if the device I am remoting into is Intel? Does that mean I cannot use it (IE both devices must be Silicon to use)? There are other tools I am just curious.
lol, there was little incentive to upgrade to begin with and now with this news, intel users have NEGATIVE incentive to upgrade
I would be very surprised. I think there will be at least two more MacOS releases on Intel after Sonoma.
They made a GUI for the 'nice' command? Why is that a big deal? One click and every process for the game is now more important than the latest notification or email grab, handy yes, but hardly revolutionary.
I have access to lots of Windows computers but I don’t want to use them and especially not for just this one app. I think they will eventually update, if only to also support Windows on ARM which is hopefully close enough to update the Mac client as well.
Problem for me is what I really want out of a PC is a gaming PC. The one I built years ago has a bad motherboard and I can’t justify the cost of the components I want to rebuild it with, and I won’t settle for less since of course I also want a good all around computer.
Doesn’t help that Windows 11 is kind of a **** show right now. Honestly I’m kind of tired of it all and just game on switch and use my Macs and now I’m just saving up for a Vision Pro in a few years. Everything is in a weird transition in end user computing right now.
And as much as I complain about buying the very last Intel MacBook Air, as you say it is my Windows laptop when I absolutely must have Windows. But it mostly just collects dust.
In my experience with Apple's non-SIRI command/dictation layer (yes, Apple had quite usable voice command way back in the early nineties), you had to set your own vocal triggers. It was finicky, especially with broadcasts going nearby. I finally started using non-english triggers.
Nowadays, I find that lots of things sound enough like "Hey Siri," confusing the digital signal processor, even with two words to work with. My horses routinely trigger Siri on my phone and watch, wickering to each other, like "Hrrr Sreeee!". Happens all the time.
It's totally feasible that shortening it to just "Siri" would need a neural engine to properly discriminate the signal from an excited horse, or someone nearby yelling "Seriously?" Seriously, Sir Reesley.
Just a friendly reminder, Apple only fully supports its current OS FULLY.
Year 2 & 3 not being fully supported, and at the whim of Apple is ridiculous.
Now that Apple has transitioned fully, I’d hope (doubtful though) that they would change this policy, and to boot, support hardware for even longer now that it is all Apple Silicon.
Obviously, they hired a whole new department to do the AR/VR stuff; why can’t they hire additional staff to fully support year two and three OS’s with all security issues.
No new features is obvious, but not fully supporting security patches is ridiculous in this day and age of e-waste.
Year 2 & 3 not being fully supported, and at the whim of Apple is ridiculous.
Now that Apple has transitioned fully, I’d hope (doubtful though) that they would change this policy, and to boot, support hardware for even longer now that it is all Apple Silicon.
Obviously, they hired a whole new department to do the AR/VR stuff; why can’t they hire additional staff to fully support year two and three OS’s with all security issues.
No new features is obvious, but not fully supporting security patches is ridiculous in this day and age of e-waste.
Is that all it's doing? Do you have a link for that?
My guess would be that it restricts use of the performance cores.
Not surprised. Even last year, some features were available only for Apple Silicon models. Maybe next year, macOS might not support Intel models.
Guess I'll just have to use Game Mode the way I've always done it - by booting up the Wintendo BootCamp