No, 1 because your machine is not even a year old. And 2, you don't know if this machine will be released in April or what it will even look like.Do i sell my early 2011 with Thunderbolt port? And get this in April?
Do i sell my early 2011 with Thunderbolt port? And get this in April?
Do i sell my early 2011 with Thunderbolt port? And get this in April?
If you want a super thin laptop fine, but don't call it a pro machine because they will cut out all of the usefulness that makes it that way.
If they get rid of the super-drive, I will never buy a macbook pro or any macbook forever.
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]
The report also addresses claims of delays in mass availability of Intel's Ivy Bridge chips, suggesting that Apple could gain an advantage over its competitors looking to release ultrabooks, as Intel's ultra-low voltage chips destined for those machines may not arrive until June.
...
Even with potential delays in mass availability of new chips, Apple has on occasion received preferential treatment from Intel, a relationship that could give Apple greater access to limited initial supplies of new Ivy Bridge chips.
Article Link: Thinner MacBook Pro Models in 13-Inch and 15-Inch Sizes Coming in April?
Calling any computer a "Pro" is really nonsense.
One person can do everything their job asks them to do with an MBA with 64 GB of hard drive space. That's a professional using a computer for professional purposes. Another person puts two 1TB drives into an MacBook Pro to store their complete video collection. That's a hobbyist with a completely unprofessional use of the computer. I can use the quad core processor in the MBP 24/7 to analyse data looking for aliens, that's about as amateurish as it comes. My private Mac at home holds about 20 times more data than the Mac at work.
Possible with Apples new thinner ODD, but cooling is still difficult.Thinner MacBook Pro Models in 13-Inch and 15-Inch Sizes Coming in April?
So long...good luck with Windows
Tadros86 said:I think the distinction is that the "No need, Optical-Drive-less" world is one where it's not needed as an integrated feature and not a need to have on the go. For myself, I would much rather have one without the ODD to reduce size/weight and when I need one for those particular occasions to plug in a peripheral at home.
Watching a movie on a train/plane with an external DVD drive sounds terrible.
Yea I agree. It's still too soon to kill off the media. Downloading content is still not up to par, and I am one of those people that rather have a physical copy than a digital. I just ordered their Final Cut Pro X and Logic Pro textbooks and they even come with DVDs of lessons. It's stupid to get rid of the current media, especially when CDs still sound better, people still use their DVD drive to watch movies/burn files, and no other laptop that is aimed toward the "Pro" market has gotten rid of theres. Maybe when faster internet becomes more affordable and more companies went toward digital downloads this would be plausible, but right now it's just too early. I still say to all those people that say "get an external DVD burner" - you're part of the problem. Even if Apple gets rid of the SuperDrive, you will still be paying current prices for the Macbook. I can see if they at least dropped the price by $100 it would make more sense to just take that extra $100 and put it towards and external burner, but asking me to pay the same price for less features? It just angers me...
BTW - I have download speeds of 42Mbs and Protools still took an hour to download off of their site. Normal people don't have 42Mbps download speed. I imagine it would take hours to download and install, instead of 30 minutes from the disc. It's just more convenient.
iMaconApple said:Standing by.......my black MacBook will no longer support updates..
I would like a black charcole like aluminum one![]()
Not sure if they would put USB 3 on Macs, just like how they never supported eSATA and BluRay. Isn't TB twice as fast as USB3?