Just transplant that lovely new GPS chip into the 41 mm regular for those of us with twiggy wrists and no athletic pursuits longer than an hour, please and thank you
Yeah @StaceyMJ86 I remember your problem with apple care. I got mine for $749 at Best Buy sale my membership at Best Buy includes automatic ”free” apple care plus on my AW Ultra, new gen 6 12.9 iPad Pro and my new 16 inch M2Pro macbook I would be uncomfortable not having apple care on my Ultra for sureI was shocked at the $799 sticker price, so that was an automatic yes for me. I went from S2 > S4 > Ultra. If I had AppleCare+ I would definitely keep it for 4 years before upgrading again.
I agree @StaceyMJ86 the 16 ProMax is gonna be a awesome upgrade for us 14 ProMax users.I don’t understand the photography terms but a great camera is an added bonus for me. With a 2 year upgrade I’m more amazed with the updated camera. I don’t think I would see any difference if I went year to year. I personally think the 16 Pro Max will be a great upgrade from the 14 Pro Max.
Because most importantly Apple loves to gate features behind new models not because of functionality but because they need more reasons for a "upgrade". So if they are on a two year cycle then they focus on the current device that year and not a new model.
Thew raised lip protects the screen, not the bezels. There is room to push the screen size closer to the edge and still have a bit of bezel.The bezels protect the screen, though. Reduce them much and it'll reduce it.
I've absolutely trashed (scratched) the screen on my 6 from rock climbing and bouldering. The ultra should take care of that, when I finally buy one.
Best Buy offered a $24 break on open box yesterday. Hard pass.Any decent sales on the current Ultra watch?
The bezels protect the screen, though. Reduce them much and it'll reduce it.
I've absolutely trashed (scratched) the screen on my 6 from rock climbing and bouldering. The ultra should take care of that, when I finally buy one
The base models offer an option. The models without cell service are less expensive. $799 just too pricey for me right now.Activating cell service on an AW has always been optional
Or just do like they do with all of the other watch names. Apple Watch Ultra (49mm) and Apple Watch Ultra (45mm) or whatever size it is. Don't have to make it more complicated than it is, they leave that to the iphone and mac naming schemes.Apple Watch Ultra mini… Sounds like a page out of Tim’s playbook. I see no reason they wouldn’t offer this at some point.
Because believe it or not, not everyone upgrades at the same time. This isn't meant to be bought every year by the same watch users as an upgrade. The same goes for iPhones.Are they really going to make a new model every year? I don’t get why this is necessary, other than those with extra income to help Apple bring in extra cash.
And I don’t mind them making a buck. But I kind of wish they had a 2 year cycle.
Apple updates WatchOS/iOS every year. Time and time again they will have a cool new software feature and say but it only works on for example Apple Watch Ultra Series 2. People argue and defend Apple every time and people through jailbreaking or whatever else turn said feature on and it works just fine on an older device.I'm not sure I understand.
"focus on the current device"? How would Apple focus on the existing Ultra? They can't add new sensors (for instance) via software. They can add new software features via software, and they do that already.
I'm not following your logic at all, sorry.
I do agree, yes, Apple offers different watches with different features at different price points. For sure. Compare the SE vs the Ultra. Far different, nothing to do with a two year cycle.
And sometimes the new phone or AW or Mac contains new HW, and SW features might require that new HW. So there’s thatApple updates WatchOS/iOS every year. Time and time again they will have a cool new software feature and say but it only works on for example Apple Watch Ultra Series 2. People argue and defend Apple every time and people through jailbreaking or whatever else turn said feature on and it works just fine on an older device.
So yes if there is a new device yearly new software features are exclusive to the new model as a way to encourage upgrades. If there is no new device there is no reason for Apple to hold features back.
Apple updates WatchOS/iOS every year. Time and time again they will have a cool new software feature and say but it only works on for example Apple Watch Ultra Series 2. People argue and defend Apple every time and people through jailbreaking or whatever else turn said feature on and it works just fine on an older device.
So yes if there is a new device yearly new software features are exclusive to the new model as a way to encourage upgrades. If there is no new device there is no reason for Apple to hold features back.
Remember folks, Apple is selling a lifestyle and not a product. The AWU is for city folk who want to think of themselves as adventurous and might go on the odd hike into the hills every month. This isn’t a criticism: I am one of these exact people and it’s why I bought one 🤭
Serious adventurers and hikers will have a Garmin that last for 3 weeks between charges and has a transparent solar panel for a glass front. It’s not meant to be a computer but it sure can track your stats.
I wonder if we will see the transparent solar panel on the AWU at any point? 🤔
This is why they get away with it. Apple said it requires the new watch so it has to be true. If Apple wants to do a watch every year I wouldn't complain but Apple goes well not everyone needs glucose monitoring so what else can we offer to get people to upgrade? Oh to use this new sleep tracking feature you have to get the new watch. People get angry and complain and maybe even prove its a software decision and Apple just says it doesn't perform as well as we want it to and everyone just goes okay Apple guess I need a new watch.Time and time again? Do you have any examples of this? Off hand I can only think of one feature that might fit this bill, but not being an AW software developer it's an assumption on my part that Apple withheld the feature from older watches, I can't say for sure that there was not some limitation that prevented the feature from being delivered to the older watches. I'm not uber familiar with the AW lifecycles though, only been using it a few years.
But let's say that's true, it almost means that Apple might be artificially then holding back things like new sensors in order to appease the anti-one-year crowd. I'd rather Apple throw in new sensors as they're ready. Not just as a Watch user, but also as a shareholder. If I'm buying a new watch tomorrow I don't want to get old tech because Apple has new stuff ready to go but is waiting for a 2 year cycle. And if Apple has blood glucose ready to go tomorrow but has to wait until September 2024 to put that in to fit a 2 year cycle, that seems like it would not be a smart move.
This is why they get away with it. Apple said it requires the new watch so it has to be true. If Apple wants to do a watch every year I wouldn't complain but Apple goes well not everyone needs glucose monitoring so what else can we offer to get people to upgrade? Oh to use this new sleep tracking feature you have to get the new watch. People get angry and complain and maybe even prove its a software decision and Apple just says it doesn't perform as well as we want it to and everyone just goes okay Apple guess I need a new watch.
As for examples look at last years iPadOS that basically said any device without a M1 processor isn't getting a majority of the new software features. They accidentally released a beta with some of the features enabled on old devices and people tried to call them out and they just said it doesn't work as well on old devices. That was the end of the discussion.
Every major update excludes more devices and every year there is a debate why software features are exclusive to new models. This is pretty much a known Apple strategy.
This. I would love an Ultra for the brighter and bigger screen, along with better battery life. But I am in no shape or form, a person who is into hiking, swimming, diving, running, marathons, etc. I don't want the bulkiness that I feel is part of the ruggedness needed for the highly active/sport crowd. And if Apple could make one in (PRODUCT)RED, it would be an instant day one purchase for me!I had an Ultra for one day. My aging eyes loved the screen size, but the bulk of it while using a computer was just a bit too annoying. I returned it and got an 8 instead. A lightweight version with the larger screen would be perfect for me.
I think they are referring to the bezel on the screen, i.e the black frame around the viewable area on the screen itself as opposed to the physical titanium raised edge.I'll ask this again, why remove the bezels? They protect the screen, which is arguably one of more important features in the Ultra (for me, at least).
You got it just because then and down grading. Makes sense. 🙄Funny I’m actually looking to down grade to a SS AW 9.
Too big for my wrists and I don’t do any adventures.