The lack of pop-up description was just a decision made when we upgraded from 2.x to 3.0. It was a bit distracting and didn't know how people would take it. It doesn't really increase load, might increase bandwidth, but prob neglibably.
if people think it's useful, it could be enabled.
As for the reply icon.... it prob was a casualty of the theme. I'll look into it.
arn
Clearly, your interpretation of "so much time" differs from mine. I don't understand how the following is "so much time" - taking the five seconds to load a thread, determine your lack of interest, and go back one page.It saves so much time being able to preview instead of having to go into a thread and then hit the back button.
Arn, judging by the amount of posts in this thread, it's clearly a wanted function.
Clearly, your interpretation of "so much time" differs from mine. I don't understand how the following is "so much time" - taking the five seconds to load a thread, determine your lack of interest, and go back one page.
So it takes an extra minute of your time. If one minute is that important, perhaps there are other things you should be doing instead of browsing.Well, click on a bunch of threads and then have to go back. Do it 10-15 times and see. There are many times I see a thread title that I think I want to see what it's about only to find when I go into it, it was a waste.
No preview is like windows95.
The lack of pop-up description was just a decision made when we upgraded from 2.x to 3.0. It was a bit distracting and didn't know how people would take it. It doesn't really increase load, might increase bandwidth, but prob neglibably.
if people think it's useful, it could be enabled.
As for the reply icon.... it prob was a casualty of the theme. I'll look into it.
arn
maflynn said:Letsjet said:Arn, judging by the amount of posts in this thread, it's clearly a wanted function.
I'm not for it, in other forums that I frequent its interfering and distracting. I move the mouse over threads and pop ups occur. If some posters used descriptive titles would this discussion even be occurring?
Hitting the back butting or a favorite on your menu bar is better then dealing the with the nuisance preview bubble (or what ever its called).
I'm not for it, in other forums that I frequent its interfering and distracting. I move the mouse over threads and pop ups occur. If some posters used descriptive titles would this discussion even be occurring?
I really like the thread preview feature on other forums I visit, and I would love to see it here.
Thanks
No thanks. It'll be stupid.
No it wouldn't.
Yes it would. Where is preview meant to go and how would it be made readable without being obstructive? For this kind of feature to fit in and work well, the forum would need a redesign. Otherwise it would be stupid and useless.
Can we get an admin response instead?
We have an admin response already in this thread, post #88 by Doctor Q.
Thanks I've seen that one. Still I guess I'd like to see one where the rationale for not having this feature enabled to begin with (like any standard vbulletin forum), is given?
Because it doesn't happen "out of the box". And as Doctor Q says, it would take custom coding to do so.
My question was about the rationale for not having the preview by hover available and enabled by default, as they do on most other vbulletin boards. I.e. I wasn't asking why there's no user-selectable option in the user CP - I now undestand such an option would be something that's not part of standard vbulletin.
But again - why exactly was the thread preview disabled, to begin with?
yeah... in the past the the decision was to keep it off because some people really don't like it (myself included) But it's possible that it may be able to be enabled as an option in the future.
arn
The lack of pop-up description was just a decision made when we upgraded from 2.x to 3.0. It was a bit distracting and didn't know how people would take it. It doesn't really increase load, might increase bandwidth, but prob neglibably.
if people think it's useful, it could be enabled.
As for the reply icon.... it prob was a casualty of the theme. I'll look into it.
arn
The basic answer is because the site owner doesn't like it.
And yet they kept it enabled on toucharcade.com, a site owned by the same owner?
I wouldn't be so demanding and assertive about such a trivial feature as it's not going to help your cause, IMO.
and the requested feature is still nowhere in sight,