Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
in the quarter to quarter mode, none of Apples competitors are really acting any different.

Look how long Steve Ballmer was able to drive MS products into the ground while the company still made money and the board and he still got yearly bonuses.
In order to get compared with The Ballmer - Apple must be more ideologically bankrupt than I ever could imagine.
Thx for the insight
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldaris
Please explain why you don't.
4 years of claimed "amazing product in the pipeline" with little to nothing to show from it. The watch certainly didn't start with Tim, he threw money at it. Project Titan is a dud, and the only innovations we've seen out of Apple has been removal of critical ports, releasing thinner products, and shrinking batteries.

in 5+ years, the only thing to come out of Tim's "amazing product in the pipeline" is broken promises. That ranks at a C-, at best.

Where the heck do you see the 'A' coming from Product Pipeline/R&D?
 
Just like school, the report card is divorced from reality, lol.
No it's not. Apple really has made a lot of money and sold a lot of products. The analyst is looking at sales, cash flow and profits, and Apple looks good in all of these.

Now, if in 2 or 3 years the public quits buying Apple products because there hasn't been enough innovation and/or the cost is too high for those products, then even if Apple has a super secret project as far seeing and as revolutionary as the iPhone was 10 years ago the analyst won't care. Cooks evaluation will be bad. The market looks at profits not products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macTW
Accordingly, after bonuses, Cook actually earned roughly $145 million last year, his biggest payout yet.

Payout, not salary. So his taxable income was how much...?
 
That was an unnecessary lengthy read, I'm not debating the reasons for delays.

No matter the reason, the reality is there are/were delays, and Apple released a product that benefits heavily from Airpods, but was almost 3 months late to market,

I appreciate you doing your practice too, but don't care for people who need to qualify where they are coming from in order to support whatever they say that follows,

It's the same thing that happened with 12.9 IPad Pro, touting Apple Pencil use but pencil no where to be found. Sure I really like my Apple Pencil too, but that is completely beside the point what I think of the products and how much or how little appreciation I have for the unique parts that need sourcing, assembling, etc. I am not inside on Apple, I am a consumer so that is the perspective I speak from. And as a general Apple fan.

Same with 9.7 pro with no smart key board, it was dumb.

It IS absurd to say Tim Cook gets A's, I don't care how intense it is for engineering/manufacturing/you name it, you haven't delivered a product to most customers. Jobs truly wouldn't have had any of this apologist culture with their short comings, he would just fix it. This happens over and over and over again, and no one is demanding you release a product without its key accessory. It's actually a fault of Apple, and tarnishes their reputation

Apple shouldn't release things until they are ready, and a complete solution,

BUT they are entirely beholden to stockholders and engrained expectations, so that will never happen

They shipped the smallest quantity of Airpods just to say they shipped by Christmas, but to 90% they didn't ship by Christmas,

But I guess details don't matter, or launch details, for a traditionally detail oriented company (down to the retail packaging it comes in)

Apologists run rampant

What you have done there is to respond to an "unnecessarily lengthy read" with an unnecessarily lengthy read.
 



Apple CEO Tim Cook sold 30,000 shares of Apple stock this week, valued at $3.6 million based on the company's stock price of $120 at the time of the transactions, according to a U.S. Securities and Exchanges Commission disclosure. The shares were sold as scheduled pursuant to Cook's predetermined trading plan.

tim_cook_hands_raised.jpg

Cook retains 1,009,809 company shares worth over $121 million based on Apple's current stock price following the sale.

A recent SEC filing revealed Cook was paid $8.7 million in 2016, which is $1.5 million less than he was paid in 2015. The decrease stems from Apple failing to meet its own target performance goals for both net sales and operating income in 2016, resulting in senior executives receiving only 89.5% of their cash incentives.

However, upon reaching his fifth anniversary as Apple CEO last year, Cook cashed in nearly $137 million in previously-awarded stock bonuses tied to both his tenure and Apple's performance under his leadership. Accordingly, after bonuses, Cook actually earned roughly $145 million last year, his biggest payout yet.

Yesterday, Apple analyst Neil Cybart opined that Cook and his inner circle are "doing what needs to be done in order to maintain Apple's relevancy," but he noted "there is room for improvement." He called out sporadic Mac and iPad updates, and slow progress with Siri, as two blemishes among others in its product strategy.In related shareholder news, the world's largest asset manager BlackRock has increased its stake in Apple and now holds 6.1% of outstanding shares in the company, up from 5.7% a year ago. Its 322,683,504 shares are valued at over $38.7 billion based on Apple's current stock price.

Article Link: Tim Cook Cashes in $3.6 Million in Stock as Respected Analyst Gives Him Passing Grades

Think that report card is a little generous.
As a apple stockholder I am concerned.the product pipeline is concerning .

in attempt to add a bit of relative context to this subjective grading:

o Product Strategy: A- NO -D
o Product Pipeline/R&D: A NO-D
o Operations: B- MAYBE
o Marketing/Storytelling: C+ NO-D
o Culture: B+. WHO CARES
o Public Face: A+ AGREE
o Financials: B AGREE-ALL THE MONEY THEY HAVE RATHOLED

I predict unless he starts releasing new iPads, better MacBooks -Mac computers, apple will continue decline.
stock prices are up but could be a dead cat bounce-lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atlantico
Accordingly, after bonuses, Cook actually earned roughly $145 million last year, his biggest payout yet.

Payout, not salary. So his taxable income was how much...?

I don't know what kind of deductions he might have, but more or less all of that is taxable (as income, rather than capital gains, btw).

But, yeah, he didn't really earn all of that in 2016. He effectively earned much of it over the course of the previous 5 years, he just received it in 2016.

To be clear, while a large portion of it represented a block of stocks that took 5 years to vest, almost as much of it represented a block of stocks that vests annually plus his salary and non-equity incentive pay. So, in a sense, nearly half of it can be thought of as having been earned in 2016.
 
Both the bonus and the appraisal stem from a high perceived coolness factor, all because "it is Apple".
Cook has inflated that idea in a terrible manner.
The overall appraisal would be a D/E (and consequently, in Apple normative a F/G) which means that he can't stay any longer.
So, out with this man. And fast, as we've lost enough momentum, quality and deadlines. The largest part of the best computer company of its kind is at stake...
 
Last edited:
2) No company would deliberately withhold stock or not increase manufacturing numbers to somehow artificially boost hype. People have been saying the same things about Apple for years, because that's a much easier paranoid conspiracy to grip, rather than the obvious answer: Apple's products are pretty darn popular.

See: Nintendo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macTW
4 years of claimed "amazing product in the pipeline" with little to nothing to show from it. The watch certainly didn't start with Tim, he threw money at it. Project Titan is a dud, and the only innovations we've seen out of Apple has been removal of critical ports, releasing thinner products, and shrinking batteries.

in 5+ years, the only thing to come out of Tim's "amazing product in the pipeline" is broken promises. That ranks at a C-, at best.

Where the heck do you see the 'A' coming from Product Pipeline/R&D?
Project Titan hasn't even been publicized yet. The fact they are researching automated driving shows a proactiveness to jump into an emerging market.

Proof that the watch didn't start under Cook?

The upcoming iPhone is rumored to be the product they've been raving about.

Apple developed the USB-C port, which allows for an all-in-one, two-way power/data transfer port that has speeds current ports don't even dream of.

Apple has innovated battery technology through display changes and innovations, with more colors and deeper images despite less power drawn.

Nobody outside of engineers seems to appreciate thinner products. As a consumer, you whine about it because it isn't your 100% dream "I don't ever need a new phone after this one" plan. Technologically, the ridiculous innovation that it takes to shrink processors, RAM, memory, etc. into such a small device is astounding. Even 5 years ago, nobody was doing what Apple has done. Remember, this is from a tech perspective, which R&D is, not consumer perspective, which R&D is not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StyxMaker
I'd honestly give marketing/storytelling the only A+ here. After all who's better at creating fiction than Apple's marketing team?
They absolutely used to be, but I can't agree with that sentiment anymore considering their last few commercials. These newer ones are, to me anyway, nothing more than cookie-cutter ads that could have been produced by countless other companies. I find them dull, predictable and uninteresting. There is nothing memorable about them at all, definitely not like "Think Different" or "I'm a Mac, I'm a PC". Apple should never have moved marketing in-house; they should stick with what they're good at.
 
Would change those grades to the following:

o Product Strategy: B- (Where I would've graded it as an A in 2012 and an A+ in 2013)
o Product Pipeline/R&D: A (They're clearly still researching things)
o Operations: B
o Marketing/Storytelling: C+ (this, I'll grant, was a good assessment)
o Culture: C
o Public Face: A-
o Financials: B (I'm going to assume that this is accurate. From what little I know of this element of their business, this seems like a fair assessment)
 
I'd honestly give marketing/storytelling the only A+ here. After all who's better at creating fiction than Apple's marketing team?

Fiction implies all talk and no action. I know my Apple products have been working great for me. Not always exactly as hyped, but often close enough at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StyxMaker
A- for product strategy,

Explain yourself,

A+ for public face, really???

'AirPods (that are repeatedly back ordered because supply is super weak) are a runaway success'

Pffft, puff piece report card,

Thanks for seeing through the passive aggressive nonsense and leading us Tim. We know the job is thankless but sometimes puberty is a tough time for some people.
 
Nice gif, to substitute for an argument.

Sure I do, I'm glad you are a SJW in defense of everything related to Tim Cook, an every day man,

A lot of people in the world (I.e. All iPhone users) could 'demand' AirPods, but if Foxconn is only shipping/'supplying' 1000 units every few weeks, that's hardly success. That's a huge wedge between high demand and low supply, meanwhile the price isn't being adjusted accordingly in a traditional theoretical supply/demand chart, where they could be making hundreds and hundreds and capitalizing on the opportunity (i'm not faulting Apple for not price gauging and price discriminating, but this is what would follow in a closed model without taking into account any real world market factors), it is the static $159 it will be up until the day before gen2,

Especially coming from a supposed supply chain guru CEO, this is weak.

Same with 7+ in short supply, for months. And Touchbar macs,

And Smart Keyboard with 9.7 pro launch.

Not sure where the "SJW" part came from.... did you learn a fun new word you heard the kids at the cool lunch table saying and you're just trying it out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: thadoggfather
Perhaps, but no one can deny this lineup is bull****, it has been for a LONG time, and the MBP below is no help, either (for those that used the previous model's features):

View attachment 684627

But no, Timmy wants us to use a crippled-ass iPad instead. F that guy and what he's done to my favorite computer (yes, computer) company.

THANK YOU! An ipad that that can barley do anything (god forbid you want to use a torrent) and maybe just a simple file system.

As for that pic that has a buy now on the macbook pro, i was in the market for a new lap top, but I didn't chose Apple this time. First non-apple laptop that I got in more than 13 years! I agree where Timmy can go!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldaris
I wonder how Cook earned an A for the product category. Nothing really new was announced, the router product line was eliminated, the Mac Pro desktop line is becoming worthless and the laptop line is lethargic. Seems more like a C grade at most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldaris
Project Titan hasn't even been publicized yet. The fact they are researching automated driving shows a proactiveness to jump into an emerging market.

Proof that the watch didn't start under Cook?

The upcoming iPhone is rumored to be the product they've been raving about.

Apple developed the USB-C port, which allows for an all-in-one, two-way power/data transfer port that has speeds current ports don't even dream of.

Apple has innovated battery technology through display changes and innovations, with more colors and deeper images despite less power drawn.

Nobody outside of engineers seems to appreciate thinner products. As a consumer, you whine about it because it isn't your 100% dream "I don't ever need a new phone after this one" plan. Technologically, the ridiculous innovation that it takes to shrink processors, RAM, memory, etc. into such a small device is astounding. Even 5 years ago, nobody was doing what Apple has done. Remember, this is from a tech perspective, which R&D is, not consumer perspective, which R&D is not.

THANKS APPLEHEAD-lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Count Blah
Cook retains 1,009,809 company shares worth over $121 million based on Apple's current stock price following the sale.
as Apple CEO last year, Cook cashed in nearly $137 million in previously-awarded stock bonuses tied to both his tenure and Apple's performance under his leadership. Accordingly, after bonuses, Cook actually earned roughly $145 million last year, his biggest payout yet.

Should we be worried, lots of key staff leaving in droves and Tim cashes in more than half his holdings in Apple...
[doublepost=1484977739][/doublepost]
People who say it's not a 'Pro' can at a minimum, recognize what a 'Pro' machine should look like.

People who say it IS a 'Pro' are those who can usually do all their work on a Macbook.

People who say it IS a 'Pro' are those who can usually do all their work on an iPad. :D
 
Marketing and Storytelling C?
This guy understands Apple is selling $20-30 wires right?
 
I love seeing all the Macrumors analysts that pop up. "He isn't giving me what I want so he gets an F and should be fired."
The standing of the company is still very good and bringing in profits. Half of you would give Steve an A+ if he were around and had done the exact same things. The iPhone and iPad lines are due upgrades and we all know they are coming. The Mac will get there, it just isn't a priority right now. After all it isn't Apple Computer anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal and macTW
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.