Of course not. Short term profit without an eye to the future is the norm these days.
How is this short term thinking?
Of course not. Short term profit without an eye to the future is the norm these days.
Still, it will sell and sell. And the reason is because people have different needs and maybe do not see the comparison the way that you do.
They might have the following reasoning behind it: I don't need a fixed keyboard and using my Cintiq on the go is a chore. The iPad Pro with pen suits my mobile needs better than a laptop with all the peripherals needed.
Ads? I don't think you understand what Tim Cook's claim to fame is. It's operations and supply chain management not ads. He is largely responsible for Apple's success since the iPod days. Steve Jobs didn't just hand select Tim out of nowhere. It's the guy Steve trusted the most to lead the company forward. Timmy is doing a fine job.
Millions of people are still going to be needing Mac OS X/Windows platforms no matter what. The iPad and tablet won't take over the market to a point where you don't have millions needing a computer.
The reality is - MANY people only need a product to surf the web - watch videos - social media - light editing/creation for text documents/excel etc. iOS is more than capable for these needs/wants.
Do you know how many stay at home moms there are?
Your opinion on the iPad Pro is just that - and opinion. Sales will tell all and based on the current trend of iPad sales - you're not understanding the change of technology with consumer wants/needs.
Yet iPad sales have crashed
Hmm, I'm not sure how you can read what Tim Cook said, change it to your own wording and meaning, then claim anything else is a bias assumption, without you looking hypocritical with your comment.
These internet warriors don't realize that Earth has a big population and change + progress is always occurring.Good call. Computer-geek keyboard warriors are an insular bunch. Just can't understand why others might actually do something different than them, have different needs, etc. Those that are solely into the fastest-biggest-baddest will never get it.
Dozens of posts into this forum and you were literally the first person that has any common sense or a perspective based in reality. Basically everybody before your post literally thinks most people only use computers the way they use them. LOL. The narrowmindedness of the tech culture surprises me sometimes...and disappoints.
Got it, but don't mistake my original post. I'm agreeing with you that on the iPad Pro, I'm positive that users will Angry Bird, Jetpack Joyride, Mine Craft, like FB posts, write emails, and cruise the web like never before on this snappier and larger device!! I'm sure the MBP-equivalent price point will also further justify this larger and faster experience! It'll be revolutionary.
I haven't met a person yet in real life that has an iPad as their main computer. So no, not many many.
Agree in part. The number of people I have to send a flow to in pdf format or project in excel so they can view is growing. Still, the MSO apps we have in iOS are not the same as the full desktop/notebook versions. Now add the lack of mouse support. For casual use it is good enough. For complex or power use, not.
You're right. Casual users can definitely just use iPads as their primary device. But why would they pick the IPP over the iPad Air 2? Even if they do, it's just cannibalization.
Please read what you wrote because you just proved my point .... For complex or power use, it is not good enough, But the number of people who use a computer as a casual device is overwhelmingly larger than people who need it for complex our power use. I would say that well more than 90% of computer owners use a basically for wordprocessing Internet and maybe presentations in Excel. YOU are not the average computer user. In fact I would guess that almost everybody on this forum is not the average computer user. The average computer user is a casual user. Therefore an iPad is more than enough for most people. Your fallacy is that you think that everybody has the same computing needs as you do. The vast majority of computer users do not have the needs that we do.
There's some guy on my Facebook friends list who ALWAYS advocates the newest Apple product as an answer to "what should I buy?". A friend of ours asked about computer recommendations in the $700-900 range and without hesitation, this dude tells her "Get an iPad Pro. There's no need to use a laptop when you have an iPad Pro, it replaces everything."
She's a computer science major. The sheer audacity someone has to recommend an iPad Pro for software development is just drastically staggering and this isn't some abnormal situation. Everywhere on this forum and everywhere the Pro is being discussed, people are clamoring about how it's going to do this or that "when people make the apps for it" and they're not even developers.
How can you pretend to claim what people will or won't do, when you don't even do that yourself?
This is the same as Tim Cook saying that Swift will take over and how anyone can write a program using Swift and yet he himself hasn't even written a Swift app. And 90% of the iOS jobs out there are still asking for Objective-C.
At the end of the day, if you need to use: software IDE's, transport files to and from your device, use expanded storage, hook up multiple devices to your machine, use instruments, multi task (real multi tasking, not iMessage and email "multi tasking"), share work across multiple users, you need a MacBook.
The iPad Pro will NEVER replace a full OS laptop. Ever. It might replace it for specialized users who have no need for IDE's, full office suites, a real browser with support for extensions/add-ons or someone who doesn't need to transfer files to/from their device easily. But will it replace the laptop in general? Hell no. And you'd be better served not buying the iPad Pro assuming that's what will happen because it'll be six months to nine months before you even see enough iPad Pro applications on the App Store just to make your iPad Pro remotely survivable as a primary computing device.
The more look at the design of this device, the more it leans toward "video" and the movie/tv industry.
I think we have different definitions of Complex/Power use.
A spreadsheet from finance or projects is complex/power for the person developing it but is not for me as a board member - however I may have to input a value. For me this is casual use.
Having to change a date range on Project and dump to spreadsheet is casual use.
Pulling up to comment embedded objects in a Word doc or do a comparison review is casual use.
Pulling up an attached document in email, commenting and highlighting is a casual use.
A security level VB embedded form is complex or power.
For this to be a notebook replacement, I and many others, would need to be able to execute complex/power tasks AND allow casual use.
For that you need the desktop/notebook version.
While " more than 90% " may be factual, they can already do that on an iPad or Android tablet. Even on their smartphone. That in itself lays lie to the "Notebook/Desktop" statement. How does "bigger" make this now more relevant?
Dude, it's a larger and faster iPad. Whoopdee-doo. Ask yourself this question...what is the point? I'll wait.Attempting to be sarcastic?
Why are you sensitive to this topic?
Dude, it's a larger and faster iPad. Whoopdee-doo. Ask yourself this question...what is the point? I'll wait.
I have people who use their iPad only. And I personally have gone weeks and months without using my laptop. You viewpoint is anecdotal. As is mine. However, there are many, many people who use iPads as their primary computer. It might depend on your definition of "many, many"...