Who has a 100% body to screen ratio?
You mean the Note 9 with a forehead and chin or the several Android phones with a notch, but no FaceID?
Talking about a theoretical future here
Who has a 100% body to screen ratio?
You mean the Note 9 with a forehead and chin or the several Android phones with a notch, but no FaceID?
Well, yes. And if Apple just came out and said as much, that would be great. But instead they indulge us all in this tedious facade that they're here to provide some kind of humanitarian service.
Apple are here to make money. That's the beginning and the end of it. In the process, they produce devices that are genuinely fantastic, but they do so to turn a profit. So it's tough to swallow when Cook starts saying things like Apple are here "to serve" people at the same time as wallowing in extraordinary mark-ups, because it feels like he's treating us like fools.
Yup. I can't upgrade due to both cost AND the fact my hand can't hold the giant phones :<What by removing the low price option?
By removing the small screen option?
Luxury brands like Porsche, BMW, Rolex, etc. don't make their products in China. Branding is the only thing that separates Apple from other Chinese made phones but is that enough? Huawei surpassed Apple to become #2.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/31/huawei-surpasses-apple-smartphone-shipments-q2-2018/
If iphone keeps getting more expensive. Will people stop upgrading every year?
In this day and age 64GB should not be an option. This pricing model is nothing but self serving.
Well technically it's his job to return value back to shareholders... testing the limits of how much users will pay for iOS seems like a valid way to do that. If you feel it's too expensive, vote with your dollars and buy something else.
This is not the case if you compare the more reasonable models. The iPhone 7 128 GB costs in Germany at launch 2016 869€. The XR costs with 128 GB 909€. That is 40€ difference and about 5% increase for 2 years of inflation and a much better product....(besides: the iPhone 7 32 GB had a starting price of 759€ in 2016 and not 699€...)
Clearly you didn’t read my first sentence. I said BEFORE LAST YEAR. So yes I’m playing with the same facts you are and tried to tell me I’m not....using the exact same thing I already stated. All your following statement are void and I’m not arguing with that. I’m talking about PRE-2017.
#READ
#hookedonphonicsworkedforme
I miss those days too.I miss the old days when carriers subsidized, a phone was cheap with the subsidized prices, and they did annual upgrades.
Unfortunately I have been a avid yearly purchaser. But im priced out. With Apple Care for the X your looking at about $1400. If you are not an impulse buyer, how can you reasonably justify that?
The issue is, they hope your going to lease your phone. A subscription world we live in. Count me out.
I am sure they will make boatloads of money, but IMO, this is everything Apple use to stand against. Confusing lineup, selling old technology, with crazy naming schemes.
Yup, where’s the SE’s replacement Timmy Mcscrooge?
and the people with a budget below $449 can take a hike.
So true.You want to serve everyone??
Really?
By offering a $1400 iphone?
or by offering a 2-year-old iphone 7 at an entry price of $450.00??
It is really a joke of pretty bad taste.
Tim Cook, raise the prices as much as you want, but please do not make fun of your customers...
Cook and Apple greed is beyond ridiculous.
Well said.Tim Cook, raise the prices as much as you want, but please do not make fun of your customers...
Is it the visual of the price tag? The illision of getting a $200 phone?
You can vote by not opening your wallet to buy an overpriced phone, but unfortunately too many people will rationalize the purchase by financing it through their carrier. "It's only $50 a month"...
It's OK Tim! you don't need to lie!
You don't need to say you serve the customers when instead you serve the investors, you can't hide to the world that Apple, thanks to you, has become the richest company ever, you really did a good job but... just make me a favour if you can:
Can you be a little bit less hypocrite?
Since you has become CEO you have been incredible good in get us used to:
- Incredible expensive laptops impossible to upgrade and repair.
- Computers without ports.
- Purchase of expensive dongles.
- Smart phones that cost more than laptops.
- Laptops that cost more than cars.
- Disposable 5000$ all in one PCs.
If the trend is correct I predict that next step will be smart watches that cost more than smart phones.
Sorry Tim, I was looking at replacing my 6S but I'm not going to empty my wallet with one of your new toys. You are really taking the piss asking that amount of money for a phone.
It looks like I'll search out a used iPhone 8 so no money this year for Apple from me.
Perhaps, one day you will realise that you are pricing yourself out of business. Then you won't be a $1T company. $1B more like.
I've read nearly have of the comments on this post and here are my opinions on some of the recurring comments/concerns.
Why still have the 7 and 8 models?
The West is no longer Apple's "bread and butter" customers. India and China are.
Because Asia is becoming more middle class, Apple is trying to keep the iPhone line "affordable" by offering old tech at a price point that the Asian middle class or above can still tolerate. Have you all forgotten Apple's recent shakeup of their India operations? One of the major issues was the lack of an affordable phone for that market. What about its investment into software development centers in Mumbai?
There are more Asians looking at that 7 and 8 as a luxury item and willing to pay for it than there are Westerners willing to pay for all the inventory of all the models, combined.
In appears, that for Westerners, Apple's philosophy is: "Meh, if they can get it, they can get it.". I just don't see Apple caring about the American, Canadian, European, or Australian markets like they used to in decades past.
Perception of Price Gouging?
Most people aren't upgrading every year and haven't been doing that for quite some time. Apple also knows that smartphone hardware has matured. We're just not going to see the ground breaking changes that we saw between the original iPhone up to the 5. Now, they can only move the needle in small increments. Hence, they have to make as much money as they can per unit, right now, because they may not see you again for another 3 to 4 years. When considering Apple's reliability, it may be longer. (I'm still running a 6+ and have no intention of upgrading for another two years.)
Let's look at the extreme case. If you annualize the purchase of an iPhone Xs Max (what a ridiculous name!) @ ~ $2,000 USD, it'll cost you (unadjusted for inflation) around $500/year or $42/month.
That's actually not that bad as long as you don't lose it or break it. Even still, if you choose to opt-in to the updated Apple Care, then can possible hedge against that risk of it being covered.
Why no "One more thing?"
What we used to know as "Apple Computer" is now the "iPhone Company" .
Let's face it, Apple's leadership is bored. But not only are they bored, they're filthy rich. They have none of the incentive that most working people have which is to get rich and/or be stimulated by their work. Imagine winning with very little effort year after year, financially beating your "competition" hand over fist.
These, mostly middle aged men, are at a point in their lives where they have very little to prove to anyone any more. They have other people, a virtual army, doing that for them.
Hence, they have virtually no incentive to change things since their "golden goose" won't stop laying these huge golden eggs. And that's why for the past five or more keynotes Phil, Eddie, and Tim have become what amount's to an insomniac's dream. That's why the crowds are so silent. Ever worse that's why avid iPhone devotees have lost their religion.