Im almost positive he was talking about the Xs or Xr.
He wasn’t referring to any model actually. He was just using pure numbers.
Cook: “... so if you look at even the phone that's priced over $1,000, most people pay $30 a month for it ...”
Im almost positive he was talking about the Xs or Xr.
Concerning the Xr's price, I'll quote my post from a couple days ago:How much cheaper do you think iPhones were?
The original iPhone was 499 for a 4 GB version and 599 for an 8. It also was tied into only ATT and didn’t have 3G capability that was available for other brands of phones.
The following years saw a price “decrease “ but sometimes only for people buying replacement phones and the listed price was always the one with the least memory.
My first iPhone was the 4s and it was 399 at 32 GB of memory.
My next iPhone was the one I still have, the 6 Plus. I maxed out its memory at 64 GB. I don’t remember what the phone by itself cost but with Apple Care and a case and maybe another charger it was $850. Somewhere I still have the receipt.
That was 4 years ago. I do think costs have gotten ridiculous but with the XR at around 750-800 for a mostly new technology phone I don’t think it’s out of line. And 750 is only 150 more than the higher priced original iPhone which was 1 dollar below 600.
The iPhone Xr is $100 too expensive. Here's why.
Pricing the Xr at $749 to start pushes it into the premium space, as Apple themselves established with the iPhone 6 Plus in 2014. Here the display, lack of 3D Touch, and lack of dual cameras simply doesn't live up to the expectations set by the premium price tag. These are expectations set by both Apple and other manufacturers.
- For just $50 more LAST YEAR, you could get an iPhone that had a 401 PPI LCD display, dual-cameras, 3D Touch, as well as an aspect ratio better optimized for widescreen video.
- For the same $749 price in 2015, you could get an iPhone that had a 401 PPI LCD display, 3D Touch, as well as an aspect ratio better optimized for widescreen video.
- In other words, the iPhone Xr is missing two impactful features found on a three-year-old iPhone 6s Plus. Not a tempting upgrade for me as a current 6s Plus owner.
- Plenty of Android smartphones at lower price points have OLED screens with a PPI higher than last year's 8 Plus, as well as dual-cameras. 3D Touch is no longer a factor that sets iPhone Xr apart from the competition, so despite the better design and software, it starts to fall short in a comparison for someone who isn't committed to iOS.
- Yes, I know we can get into an entire conversation about the benefits of iOS vs Android, this is mainly focusing on the hardware.
Apple will sell plenty, but they shouldn't.
Inevitably someone will argue that Apple should have the right to price their products any way they want. While this is true, it doesn't change the fact that the iPhone Xr is more expensive than last year's iPhone 8, and potental buyers should do enough research to know exactly what they are getting for their money.
Here are some plausible reasons Apple assumes they can get away with pricing it at $749, and customers will still buy it:
- It looks like an iPhone X / Xs and has a lower price tag. That's it, just the look.
- It has just enough of the iPhone X feature set to make it seem high-tech (primarily Face ID), and potential buyers will often ignore the shortcomings of the device due to a lack of research or understanding.
- To make matters worse, the marketing phrase "Liquid Retina" is intended to mislead less-knowledgable potential buyers into thinking this is some kind of brand new display tech, when it really isn't.
- Potential buyers have three choices to stay in the iOS ecosystem: The Xs, a prohibitively expensive smartphone which they may not be able to justify or afford; the Xr; or an older generation with an older design (aside from the discontinued X).
- It remains to be seen how many of these customers will opt for an 8 / 8 Plus / X, or older generation instead.
- Brand recognition.
If Apple really wants to position the Xr as the entry-level 2018 iPhone and an upgrade from last year's 8, it should be priced comparably and at the price point where it would offer the best value. Similarly, last year's iPhone 8 should have been priced comparably to the iPhone 7. But instead, the two price increases combine to $100, or the price of the starting Plus model in 2015 now attached to the entry-level / non-Plus iPhone, the Xr.
To make matters worse, Apple positioned the Xr as a replacement for last year's non-Plus and Plus models both. There is no 2018 Plus model at a comparable price to last year's Plus model, or even $50 higher. Hence the price for Plus owners simply wanting comparable hardware jumps all the way from $799 to the $1,099 Xs Max.
iPhone 6s Plus owners who purchased at full price in 2015 are going to be paying no less in 2018 for lower PPI / no 3D Touch, or $350 more for the Xs Max. This isn't an insignificant sum and has definitely caused me to reconsider upgrading my 6s Plus at all this year.
I'd settle for a slightly less innovative phone at a reasonable price that isn't already 2 years old.
It does not seem like a lot unless you look at the total cost. Most people don't do that and thus they buy a $1200 phone without really realizing it.
Has anyone else noticed how Crook prefers late night and early morning entertainment shows instead of tech shows? Telling, ain't it...
X will probably be the last, current year, premium phone I'll buy. I'll probably start lagging a year behind or buy the cheaper phone that's available (which ever is the better value). It's just getting way too expensive. Apple better be careful or they are going to price themselves out of the market.
I have my X on iOS 12 and my series 3 on Watch OS 5. Honestly I can tell any difference with either. Some new watch faces I do not like. Low heart rate alarm option. iBooks/Books looks different but I use the Kindle App most of the time. Had to dig around to find my news channels I focus on in the news app. Saw the new measure app, probably will never use it.
If I had less than a 8 and wanted a new phone I would wait for the XR or just wait. I like my X but I do miss the finger print unlock so I can unlock in on my desk without my face having to be on top of it.
I wish I would have waited to get my first Watch now as the series 3 was my first but I am not going to upgrade.
Given that less people are on the yearly or every other year upgrade cycle now, I can understand the price and capability of a new highest end iPhone is priced as it is.
Because people are cheap. Not because it's a better phone. Kinda of like the old comparison of Honda vs Ferrari.But the Xr is probably going to be the best selling one
Is that really a given? I see it the exact opposite. A lot of people used to wait 2 years for the free upgrade, that's now gone and everyone is on a payment plan, I think it easier to upgrade every year since your payment more or less stays the same as long as you turn in your old phone.
Exactly my point. I don't ever remember seeing Jobs on a Late Night Talk show or Good Morning America.Apple's primary market for phones is Joe & Jane Consumer -- average non-technical folks who watch late-night TV shows and who watch morning entertainment shows. It's *not* geeks watching tech shows.
so if you look at even the phone that's priced over $1,000, most people pay $30 a month for it, so that's about $1 a day
This x 1000. I can't even hold the phones let alone afford one. Too dang big. I was saving up to update but that's out the window, lol.Better bring back the good old iPhone SE!
Tim Cook is correct. Carriers transitioning from the subsidy model to the monthly payment model allowed Apple and Samsung to blow up phone prices. People in this country (US) buy things by monthly cost and I would venture to say few people actually know the true total cost of the phones they buy. They just see the monthly number. On a 30 month payment plan a $500 price increase equals $16.68 a month. It does not seem like a lot unless you look at the total cost. Most people don't do that and thus they buy a $1200 phone without really realizing it.
Pretty sure the iPhone 4 was the "most innovative phone" of its time (heck, the design still holds up today) and yet the price remained the same. Don't buy into Cook's BS jargon, dude is all about profit over delivering real quality products.