Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm eagerly waiting for Cosmopolitan's review on the current state of the tech and communication industries to guide my personal opinions.

/s

I’m eagerly awaiting Tim Cook to be replaced.

By one of the many possible candidates from our forum posters here who are apparently more qualified than he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zapm
On a side note some of the people who spent 3k on the donglebook profit say they do like it. :apple:
 
Does Tim actually know anything about product or tech? seems like a supply guy that got lucky.....

He was at the right place at the right time with an impressive background that landed him the job as a successor CEO...Your personal feeling against him or opinion on his tech savyness doesn't change how Apple has been doing as a corporation under his leadership. Blame the Tech execs for their lack of innovation there, it's not the CEOs job.
 
"As interest in iPhone wanes"
Maybe "as interest in iPhone stops accellerating at the same ridiculous rates of years past"
But "wanes"? This year with at minimum maintain sales rates even with X costing $1000
Not immediately of course, but while seeming far-fetched at the moment, physical phones are sure to be replaced in the future by an alternate (and acceptable) new incarnation of the originally not so well received 'unattractive glasses', enabling virtual 'projection' of content and info in front of us, anywhere and everywhere we can find ourselves, empowered with super-smart virtual assistants of course, all the while untethered by cumbersome 'bulky' gadgets.

Continued miniaturization and radically new thinking will make that possible, and development of such technology is likely already well underway for large scale introduction and adoption within 5-10 years, gradually rendering current smartphones as relics of the past, and as quaint as those 'monster Motorola phones' of the seventies and eighties.

Whoever ultimately ends up at the forefront of that exciting new field, design-, tech-, and development-wise, may well find themselves becoming the next trillion-dollar company.
 
Last edited:
No worries Eddy what a mag has to say just keep cashing thoes big checks from Apple every week.$$$$$$
 
An someone, anyone, tell me what Eddie Cue brings to the table at Apple other than incompetence in all the areas he is involved?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peperino
Really sad how the rich spend so much time jerking each other off (as evidenced by this article) to give anything more than lip-service to the little guy.

The vast majority of people on that list are not actually doing anything. They are figureheads; they give orders which other, less well-off people are compelled to follow; and for all that they are paid millions upon millions of dollars. Give me a ****** break. :eek:

"Thank you. Kiss my ass. Good night. God bless."
 
I kind of agree that Apple needs something new or to redefine something like they did with the iPhone else they're going to end up in trouble. But right now Apple is very successful, and even if they weren't, it took Blackberry like ten years to finally die. Apple has 100x the resources. With that much money they'll find a new hit eventually, or copy whoever comes up with the new hit and do it better. I don't know why people are so doom and gloom about it.
 
Yes granted, though Apple does have a feeling of a one trick pony lately.

Yes? If anything, Apple seems less like a one trick pony lately, with a Services operations basically the size of Facebook and wearables sharply up.

This is reflected by a much lower revenue share of the iPhone.
 
Nope. It's the best keyboard I've used from Apple (going back to the 1980s). After a short period of getting used to it, an hour or so, my typing speed and accuracy have markedly increased. Especially coming from my previously used MBA.

If your standard is an old IBM 3270 terminal from the 1970's there will likely be disagreement.

How long have you been using your 2017 MBP?
[doublepost=1507043769][/doublepost]

Agree. And such an awful writing style, too.

about 6 months. I still smash my fingers into it, its not comfy to use at all. Glad you like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nvmls
But he hasn't launched the homepod... it was announced and then everything leaked revealing the rest of the product line updates. What kind of idiot wrote this review?
 
I don't think interest in the iPhone is waning, but our patience for innovation certainly is. The iPhone still is a modern marvel of engineering and quality (IMO), but some of the "features" being touted are nothing more than expensive gimmicks. People who spend $1K for a phone likely don't care about animated emojis or glass-backed enclosures. Accurate color representation, screen resolution, and damage resistance are, arguably, the most important. In my opinion, Apple should back out of the "me-too" devices (HomePod, Apple TV) and ditch the ridiculous programming and refocus on their core products.

Animated emoji is not an expensive gimmick - it's a fairly inexpensive proof-of-concept gimmick that utilizes new hardware and software that is also being used for more serious purposes.

The glass back is there to facilitate Qi charging. The use of a charging pad does not necessarily qualify as a gimmick (though I'd classify it as an incremental convenience rather than a major innovation).

As to HomePod and Apple TV? One has to ask what Apple's "core products" are at this point. From my perspective, the ecosystem is the core product. Essentially any product that profitably extends the reach of the ecosystem has a place. The more ways you can play the media sold/rented by Apple, the greater value those sales/subscriptions have to the end user. Ceding a particular part of the user's environment to other, competing ecosystems undermines the value of the ecosystem.

Based on sheer numbers sold/percentage of revenue, there are certainly key products - iPhone, iPad, Mac, and iTunes/App Store. The nostalgic continue to believe Mac is Apple's core product (or should be), but that's no longer the case. In the 10 years since iPhone's debut Mac unit sales have quadrupled, and it's easy to argue that would not have happened without iPhone. The integration of mobile devices with the computer makes all of them more valuable. Relatively low-priced, special-interest products like Apple TV and HomePod aren't likely to make large, direct dents in the company's bottom line, but each one purchased helps ensure that Apple's customer's will be buying their replacement devices and content from Apple.

And as to Apple's current media content experiments? Similar criticism had been made of early efforts by Netflix, HBO, radio networks efforts to expand into that new-fangled TV thing... All were judged failures until they began to produce hits. The nature of entertainment media is that large amounts of content will be rejected by the audience, but the hits will eventually pay for the failures, and then some. Apple has more than enough money to keep producing flops until they finally have their first hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macs4nw
I am with them on the waning interest in the MacBook Pro. I would have purchased two, but I absolutely cannot buy a computer that will require me to carry a minimum of three dongles (USB, HDMI, SD Card). I agree that wireless is the future, but if Apple really want to enable that then the W1 chip (and similar) would be available to other developers to use for other wireless accessories.

Bluetooth is NOT capable of replacing a wire for me at this point.
 
I guess that's fair although we don't really know if it's all Eddy or not. All I know is content deals are taking too long.
We don't know all the details but you (not you specifically) can't have it both ways either. People love to complain that Apple TV and iTunes suck and blame those entirely on Eddy. I'm just saying we need to step back and give credit where it's due and criticize when it's relevant too.
 
Launching HomePod. Wait, are they out right now? Seems silly to give him props for something that doesn't exist in homes right now.

Especially considering how much trouble they've had getting stuff out on time...I wouldn't be surprised if it gets pushed back until next year.
 
“As consumers reject the new MacBook Pro and Apple arrives late to the game with HomePod, an Echo wannabe, the company is clinging to the iPhone for more than half of its revenue--an inauspicious strategy, since phone sales are predicted to decline.”

So it’s bad to have half your revenue from a wildly successful product (iPhone)? What about Google, who makes close to 90% of their revenue from serving ads? A product that consumers actually hate (but companies love)?

The HomePod isn’t an Echo wannabe. It’s a hifi speaker that also has a smart assistant. Sonos should be worried.

I can see Bezos at the top. But Zuckerberg in second? What has he done of significance, besides creating Facebook?

Yes, it is really bad. What if what happened to the Motorola Razr happens to iPhone? Company needs to be diversified in their revenue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.