I really don't like the dual lens camera approach, I think it's a dumb idea!
I think the only use for a dual lens camera would be for 3D imaging. I'd rather have a much bigger iPhone Nipple™ for a proper lens than a useless gimmick.
I really don't like the dual lens camera approach, I think it's a dumb idea!
I got over 100k just in lenses and these pictures look like crap. One of my camera body alone is 30k by itself with no lens. I'll be highly embarrassed to show these pictures off.I'm a pretty serious photography hobbyist (I shoot with big Nikon DSLRs and glass, been doing it for about 10 years now)... and I have to admit that these look great. I'd love to see some uncompressed, full-resolution shots... but the clarity, color and shadows look pretty damn good.
Of course: it's never going to rival big glass... but for a tiny camera you always have with you this looks really good. It's definitely pushing me towards picking up one of these...
What is far better than these? The 4s photos don't hold a candle to the iphone 7 photos for the apples to oranges comparison that this is.someone already posted them and they are far better then these......did you even bother to read???
View attachment 650415
I doubt he took those pictures....remember how he took this bad picture? yeah...He probably paid someone to take those.
Taken by Sports Illustrated photographer David E. Klutho
Your personal attack on someone with a difference of opinion sure makes you a big man, doesn't it? We sure are jealous!
You know, a lot of expensive equipments, allows you the ability to talk about your expensive equipment. That's all. So you compare top of the line camera equipment against a tiny cell phone sensor and lenses? All cell phones will loose. Sheesh.I got over 100k just in lenses and these pictures look like crap. One of my camera body alone is 30k by itself with no lens. I'll be highly embarrassed to show these pictures off.
Expensive gear yes, but yet you know nothing about my photography background.You know, a lot of expensive equipments, allows you the ability to talk about your expensive equipment. That's all. So you compare top of the line camera equipment against a tiny cell phone sensor and lenses? All cell phones will loose. Sheesh.
These look like snapshots anyone could snap with a 5-year-old smartphone if they had access to the sidelines.
But since they're done with an iPhone then they're magical.
It could also mean he's quite sensitive to quality, probably far more than you or I. I use my super expensive audio equipment as an angle all the time... Because I have the best, and I am trained to know what it does and how it performs over inferior products... It's all about the industry and their experts. I don't think he's an amateur if he's accurate in his gear spec.You know, a lot of expensive equipments, allows you the ability to talk about your expensive equipment. That's all. So you compare top of the line camera equipment against a tiny cell phone sensor and lenses? All cell phones will loose. Sheesh.
The shutter speed is impressive for these action shots and the colors are good, but it's hard to gauge how nice these pics are without seeing the original. I zoomed in a little on an image directly from macrumors and on one from the tweet. It's obviously been downsampled a lot for MR but I bet it was even downsampled for the tweet because they are both surprisingly low resI'd love to see the RAW versions of the photos. But great color on these for sure.
They look fine, but nothing amazing. These are all taken in optimal conditions. Let's see some full resolution and low light shots! Apple has let their cameras fall very far behind the competition in recent years and I want to see them get that ground back. These shot just don't tell me anything.
The current Samsungs have a faster lens and possibly larger sensors than the iPhone 7. While Apple may still have an edge on image processing, it seems they still have to compensate for inferior hardware. Thinness is really hurting the iPhone camera.
I also worry about the zoom camera. Everything else aside, that sensor will just be getting even less light. I can't help but feel that the iPhone 7 may have been better off using the real estate of both cameras to implement a single one with a larger sensor (more light per pixel, not higher MP)
Or some of us also know quality(or the reverse) and have been trained and are experts and can comment also; without owning expensive equipment.It could also mean he's quite sensitive to quality, probably far more than you or I. I use my super expensive audio equipment as an angle all the time... Because I have the best, and I am trained to know what it does and how it performs over inferior products... It's all about the industry and their experts. I don't think he's an amateur if he's accurate in his gear spec.
I can see the iPhone being used for everyday photos.Some of these shots appear, as some have said, oversaturated and blurry. I do professional shoots and my clients would laugh and walk out if I said 'Today, I'm shooting with....'I got over 100k just in lenses and these pictures look like crap. One of my camera body alone is 30k by itself with no lens. I'll be highly embarrassed to show these pictures off.