Why do the best of us get taken early while the scumbags seem to live forever (e.g. Rockefeller was in his 90's, Cheney still lurking around, etc.)
Good question!Why do the best of us get taken early while the scumbags seem to live forever (e.g. Rockefeller was in his 90's, Cheney still lurking around, etc.)
That's crazy talk!Or maybe he’s just thinking about his friend on the anniversary of his death.
I used to have a 4s in perfect condition. I let my daughter use it as an iPod and she lost it a year ago.I still have my 4 that I preordered as soon as possible, after watching his keynote. Still one of my favorite devices, and still used quite often to this day.
Sorry to hear that!I used to have a 4s in perfect condition. I let my daughter use it as an iPod and she lost it a year ago.
It still hurts......
You have some interesting observations but I must push back against this one. Apple didn’t invent the circuit board, but they were the first to marry an easy, mouse-driven GUI with with an hand-carryable unibody computer. They didn’t invent the microHD but they were the first to put 5GB (instead of a CD’s worth) into a portable music player, let alone one with such a simple interface They didn’t invent catalog searching but now-ubiquitous drill-down searching first showed up for consumers in iTunes. They didn’t invent the cell phone, but now just about every smartphone looks more or less like an iPhone.Apple never was on the cutting edge of technology
Most likely not very different from the current product line-up.
Tim Cook is milking the Steve Jobs thing as much as possible to cover what a failure of a CEO he is. Using the same 4 year old design on a new phone, wow, that's ancient for tech gadgets, real progress there.
Why does everyone insist that everything at Apple was PERFECT under Steve? There were issues back then and there are issues now.
From an insanely great company (1998-2012), to the greedy fashionable brand.
Rest in peace, Steve.
So you just came here to be a troll.Because SJ was a Messiah for frothy Apple loyalists (i.e. all the ones on this thread that are so fanatic that in order to adulate Steve, they must instinctively throw hateful attacks on Cook). And since SJ is Messiah, please realize that a Messiah's death anniversary is more important than his birthday. (See for comparison, that Biblical guy who died on a Cross, his death anniversary is slightly more sacred than his birth anniversary).
I wish Steve Jobs was back.
Tim Cook manages Apple in a Numbskull manner. I'm sure he's a great individual, but for the life of me I can't figure out why Steve picked him. Tim is the absolutely wrong leader to lead Apple right now, he's worse than Gil. The only reason why people buy Apple now is because they're stuck in the walled garden. What a shame.
Call me cynical but I think it's more Apple PR!
Putting "still inspiring us..." makes the message look like marketing.
The irony - Tim uses Steve's name to this day.....and hides behind his legacy and products..... Less playing victim bud!
That’s just sad.The zenith for me was 2012.
Nasty.Believe me, Timmy. Steve is missed more to us than you.
You are correct, Tim Cook is the most successful CEO in the history of the world! He has taken Apple from $350 Billion in market cap to $800 Billion!Tim Cook is milking the Steve Jobs thing as much as possible to cover what a failure of a CEO he is. Using the same 4 year old design on a new phone, wow, that's ancient for tech gadgets, real progress there.
In short, everything Steve Jobs had been doing while he was still alive? Because Steve never made products thinner at the expense of battery life, or removed ports, or championed the use of adaptors and docking stations, or introduced an iPhone with a glass back, or shipped a product with insufficient ram, right?Nobody really knows whether Jobs would have allowed iOS7's UI to see the light of day or the removal of the "lickable buttons" I so miss, but yet I fully 100% know he would never have allowed the mess of an iOS UI we're stuck with currently, nor the Fisher Price-looking OS.
But for me the biggest criticism I have of Tim is his inability to recognize (and put a stop to) so much prioritization on "less is more." Today's Apple w/o Jobs is too much about offering more (and charging more by) providing less:
- More sleekness via fewer USB ports, no headphone jack, no magsafe, no function keys...flexibility and convenience be damned (and more work & dongles to do what used to be easy)
- More thinness, battery life improvements be damned.
- More emphasis on delicateness of design, durability be damned.
- More removal of tactile buttons on the iPhone, convenience of unlocking w/o having to look at the device be damned. (more work to do what used to be easier)
- More sleekness of the trackpad via ForceTouch, "feel" be damned.
- More unnecessary minimalism and vagueness in the iOS/OSX, intuitiveness & prettiness of "Apple design" & "it just works" & joy-of-use be damned.
Interesting to see whether Tim lets Jony & Craig & the boys keep painting Apple into a corner of offering more by providing less. There's only so much more left to remove. Wonder if Apple will have the ability (and who) to recognize this unsustainable strategy & pivot in time.
In short, everything Steve Jobs had been doing while he was still alive? Because Steve never made products thinner at the expense of battery life, or removed ports, or championed the use of adaptors and docking stations, or introduced an iPhone with a glass back, or shipped a product with insufficient ram, right?