Tim sounds exactly like my boss.
It's everyone else's fault, never his.
He does nothing wrong, other people are the problem.
Perhaps my boss should meet Tim they'd get on well![]()
Sounds like an ex too!
lol
Tim sounds exactly like my boss.
It's everyone else's fault, never his.
He does nothing wrong, other people are the problem.
Perhaps my boss should meet Tim they'd get on well![]()
People don’t want a $1,500 smartphone!!!
Tim was warned of this at the end of 2016. What has Tim done in two years since? I know hew blew over $100 billon on stock buybacks.
You can't spend money on R&D if there is no innovation. IMHO, what Tim Cook should have used the money is the R&D in robotic manufacturing of iPhones and have the robotic factories built in the US. The problems with China were coming, and Cook was clearly told so (by a certain person whose name we shall not mention here lest we should upset the moderators).I see a few problems. First, Apple doesn’t upgrade many of their products. For instance I had a family member who would buy a new iMac but he has the latest from over a year ago. The Mac Mini was shamefully old and the Mac Pro still is. And Apple has the nerve to charge the same price for old tech. It looks greedy.
Second, stock Apple products are often configured in a way no one would want forcing a ridiculously expensive upgrade. RAM and disk space upgrades are horrible deals.
Third, there are people like me who simply don’t want to spend what they charge for a new phone. There are also people like me who don’t want a giant phone. I want an SE size. I would gladly pay for a modest spec bump. I’m not alone.
Fourth, in the phone category the market is more mature. There aren’t the great leaps we had in the beginning. The tech holds up longer and we don’t have the same drive to upgrade.
Fifth, Apple Products don’t ‘just work for me’. I simply have too many problems with my various devices that go unresolved. I’ve lost some of my early enchantment with Apple products. They are still better than everyone else but I’m not excited about them as I once was. The idea that by controlling the hardware and software they avoid issues other OSs have simply doesn’t ring true for me anymore.
Sixth, Tim Cook’s social justice garbage harms the brand. The people who like it were likely mostly already Apple customers. But there are plenty of people who appreciate Apple products but hate the politics. Now Cook has created some resistance to them buying Apple products.
I didn’t realize this. Stock buybacks are really criminal. It is used to boost the share price. Analysis I’ve seen shows it is almost always bad for the company in the long term. The money could be better spent on R&D or even on lower prices to drive demand.
Tim sounds exactly like my boss.
It's everyone else's fault, never his.
He does nothing wrong, other people are the problem.
Perhaps my boss should meet Tim they'd get on well![]()
Apple's pricing is the problem, pure and simple. They're pricing themselves out of the market with their increases. If sales are down, they increase the pricing to make up for the lost revenue, you can't keep doing that otherwise you will lose even more sales. Everyone has a breaking point.
I'd like a new 15" MacBook Pro but in Canada the pricing is out of control
Overpriced, no-innovation products. That's all Tim had to say.
To be fair, only a handful of people sniped about politics and sexuality in this thread. To be fair to them, it’s not the customer or the forum commentator bringing politics and sexuality into Apple’s business, it is in fact Tim Cook himself who does so, and quite prominently. He is the one shaping and implementing corporate policies that align with his own principles as an individual interested in the environment and social justice...but he slaps the Apple logo on it all. Which is fine, he is CEO and can do that. He’s certainly not the first or only CEO to do that nor will he be the last.Wow, the first page of responses to this article are garbage. Yes, the prices are high, but can you imagine the PR nightmare if Cook admitted that? Current gen iPhone owners would feel ripped off, people wouldn't want to buy the phones because they'd feel Apple already was trying to take advantage of people, the Apple brand would be cheapened, stocks would plummet, etc.
On top of this, people now think this is justification to bring in Cook's politics and sexuality as the reason for lower revenue than the previous quarter? Complete ignorance.
And Spindler used to hide under his desk.What a complete scumbag. Timmy has single-handedly destroyed everything Apple once stood for. Not even Michael Spindler was this bad. The board needs to wake up and shove his as$ out the door
I see a few problems. First, Apple doesn’t upgrade many of their products. For instance I had a family member who would buy a new iMac but he has the latest from over a year ago. The Mac Mini was shamefully old and the Mac Pro still is. And Apple has the nerve to charge the same price for old tech. It looks greedy.
Second, stock Apple products are often configured in a way no one would want forcing a ridiculously expensive upgrade. RAM and disk space upgrades are horrible deals.
Third, there are people like me who simply don’t want to spend what they charge for a new phone. There are also people like me who don’t want a giant phone. I want an SE size. I would gladly pay for a modest spec bump. I’m not alone.
Fourth, in the phone category the market is more mature. There aren’t the great leaps we had in the beginning. The tech holds up longer and we don’t have the same drive to upgrade.
Fifth, Apple Products don’t ‘just work for me’. I simply have too many problems with my various devices that go unresolved. I’ve lost some of my early enchantment with Apple products. They are still better than everyone else but I’m not excited about them as I once was. The idea that by controlling the hardware and software they avoid issues other OSs have simply doesn’t ring true for me anymore.
Sixth, Tim Cook’s social justice garbage harms the brand. The people who like it were likely mostly already Apple customers. But there are plenty of people who appreciate Apple products but hate the politics. Now Cook has created some resistance to them buying Apple products.
I didn’t realize this. Stock buybacks are really criminal. It is used to boost the share price. Analysis I’ve seen shows it is almost always bad for the company in the long term. The money could be better spent on R&D or even on lower prices to drive demand.
Don’t be so patronising. He was merely pointing out that he would be prepared to pay say a 20% premium for the best, but no more. He certainly won’t pay huge premiums for something that these days is arguably not the best.Sure. Nice that your ‘price’ won’t have to include all the research and development, staff, business, building, tax, overheads, marketing etc etc etc costs. You have a great head for figures. Your household budget must be a wonde to behold with the figures that you throw together
Sure. Nice that your ‘price’ won’t have to include all the research and development, staff, business, building, tax, overheads, marketing etc etc etc costs. You have a great head for figures. Your household budget must be a wonde to behold with the figures that you throw together
Wow, the first page of responses to this article are garbage. Yes, the prices are high, but can you imagine the PR nightmare if Cook admitted that? Current gen iPhone owners would feel ripped off, people wouldn't want to buy the phones because they'd feel Apple already was trying to take advantage of people, the Apple brand would be cheapened, stocks would plummet, etc.
On top of this, people now think this is justification to bring in Cook's politics and sexuality as the reason for lower revenue than the previous quarter? Complete ignorance.[/QUOTE
Deep down, current iPhone owners probably already feel ripped off
Yep they include all the tech at lower prices AFTER Apple has spent dollar on R and D in order for them to pull the product apart and copy, sorry ‘get inspired’ by without having to spend anything. What ridiculousness are you spouting. And if I want to patronise someone’s ridiculous apparent knowledge then I shall. Ok ? Nice. Now jog on son.Don’t be so patronising. He was merely pointing out that he would be prepared to pay say a 20% premium for the best, but no more. He certainly won’t pay huge premiums for something that these days is arguably not the best.
As for all those R&D costs, tax, overheads that have to be included, every other business deals with and has to include them also, and still manage to produce excellent products at lower prices? Perhaps the thing they don’t include is that peice of the pie called greed or that other slice called profiteering
Yep they include all the tech at lower prices AFTER Apple has spent dollar on R and D in order for them to pull the product apart and copy, sorry ‘get inspired’ by without having to spend anything. What ridiculousness are you spouting. And if I want to patronise someone’s ridiculous apparent knowledge then I shall. Ok ? Nice. Now jog on son.
I want more value for money, not cheaper products. I would rather they gave an extra warranty of all of its product than lower its price by $100.
What I don't understand is why Apple needs an All Hand meeting for a 5% revenue miss?
AgreedI love all the trolls here....Apple doomed, no innovation, etc etc. So the are literally gonna make a FEW billion less than the approx 93 billion projected. Either way you cut that its STILL A GIANT LOAD OF MONEY. Its not like they only make a few million and now its down to a few hundred grand....or when they were literally weeks away from closing the doors in the 90s. Even if Apple, starting today, didn't bring in another red cent in revenue they could continue operating for years.
They have so much cash on hand (hundreds of billions) itll make anyones head spin, except the trolls of course.
Apple screwed up on pricing this year thats all. The phones are still amazing and everyone still loves the iPhone that uses one. This is nothing more than the captain explaining a minor course correction in the grand scheme of it all.
I love all the trolls here....Apple doomed, no innovation, etc etc. So the are literally gonna make a FEW billion less than the approx 93 billion projected. Either way you cut that its STILL A GIANT LOAD OF MONEY. Its not like they only make a few million and now its down to a few hundred grand....or when they were literally weeks away from closing the doors in the 90s. Even if Apple, starting today, didn't bring in another red cent in revenue they could continue operating for years.
They have so much cash on hand (hundreds of billions) itll make anyones head spin, except the trolls of course.
Apple screwed up on pricing this year thats all. The phones are still amazing and everyone still loves the iPhone that uses one. This is nothing more than the captain explaining a minor course correction in the grand scheme of it all.
think they have no choice but to learn and reduce prices if they want to sell millions and millions.Nobody is discounting the historical success Apple had going into 2018. What they're concerned about is exactly what you listed above.
Apple screwed up on pricing this year. (in addition to a few other items).
What will matter is not what has already happened, but if Apple learns and adjusts, or do they double down on their current direction.
think they have no choice but to learn and reduce prices if they want to sell millions and millions.
You and I have come to that conclusion. Has the CFO/CEO who make up these decisions? if not what conclusions have they made?
There was evidence starting in 2017 that the price increasing was going to lead to lower volumes. The Mac lineup already saw that affect in 2018. 2017 saw prices accross the Mac lineup increase. 2018 saw sales volumes the lowest they've been since 2010.
So Apple doubled down by increasing prices everywhere else.
I'm not sure what they expected. All I feel like I see from tim Cook is moves for maximization of immediate short term profit. Not long term strategic planning by growing the user base