Regardless of whether Apple gave birth to the technology in question or bought the companies that did, the argument remains the same, in that Apple made the investment, not the other copy cat companies that followed suit.this is also been thourougly debunked.
Apple frequently is NOT first to develop technology. They do an amazing job refining it for consumer sale, But overall, the bulk of the technology in Apple devices was invented by other parties.
This isn't to take away from what they do a great job on and that's making these things generally work really well. But to believe that everything tech we have today was invented by Apple is ... well, wrong.
all your posts seem to be overly condescending to people who counter the points you make, which are so far from what i cans ee in this thread, wrong.
You don't have hundreds of billions in pure cash by being stupid. Apple has screwed up before, they will again, but they'll figure it out. No one person or company is perfect. the fact Tim even has to do this stupid dog and pony show for all the wall street frat bros is beyond stupid.Nobody is discounting the historical success Apple had going into 2018. What they're concerned about is exactly what you listed above.
Apple screwed up on pricing this year. (in addition to a few other items).
What will matter is not what has already happened, but if Apple learns and adjusts, or do they double down on their current direction.
You don't have hundreds of billions in pure cash by being stupid. Apple has screwed up before, they will again, but they'll figure it out. No one person or company is perfect. the fact Tim even has to do this stupid dog and pony show for all the wall street frat bros is beyond stupid.
Regardless of whether Apple gave birth to the technology in question or bought the companies that did, the argument remains the same, in that Apple made the investment, not the other copy cat companies that followed suit.
Let's be honest. If they dropped prices by $100 everyone would jump ship because "Oh no! Apple's going down and they know it! Get out while you can!"Alternatively they could reduce the price of their product lines to increase sales. It would still be a premium brand if they dropped prices by $100 or so!
Having said that, I wish I was concerned over only $84 billion revenue in a single quarter![]()
Sure. Nice that your ‘price’ won’t have to include all the research and development, staff, business, building, tax, overheads, marketing etc etc etc costs. You have a great head for figures. Your household budget must be a wonde to behold with the figures that you throw together
The pricing structure doesn't reflect the reality many people feel, like the price gouging on memory for instance. For me the bigger problem is that Apple are no longer making products that I want.
I want a headphone jack. I want a smaller device. I want to be able to access the file system of a USB drive from my iPad. I want a regular USB port on my MacBook. I do not want the awful touch bar. I want to see the professional software make a return (like Aperture).
I really don't feel Apple have the edge anymore and I think this is true for a lot of people. I'm glad it's affecting the bottom line, maybe this will be the much needed reality check.
Tim's greed has killed the ecosystem
If iPhones weren't so overpriced maybe I'd still have one, plus a Watch and some AirPods to go with it
Maybe I'd then also be more inclined to replace my old MacBook with another Apple machine, and wouldn't have cancelled my iCloud storage plan
It all falls apart quickly when offensively high prices encourage you to look around at alternatives, and then Apple arbitrarily punishes users for not being 100% Apple
The HomePod is the perfect example of Tim. A great idea but it's a non-starter even before looking at the price because Tim wanted to lock down the Bluetooth to punish all non-iOS device users.
What’s a niche product like the Mac mini got to do with this debate at hand. Keep upYeah I’m sure the research and development costs are massive for the Mac Mini. They probably dropped hundreds of billions over the four years it took to bring out a refresh with some new colors.
I don't think you are absorbing what the stock buybacks are all about and how they help the company. If you look into it, you can learn that it is the best move for Apple actually.
What’s a niche product like the Mac mini got to do with this debate at hand. Keep up
Absolutely. We're seeing a live case study of business management unfold before our eyes.
with the amount of cash available, Apple can take some time to get it right. But you can't take al the time in the world. The argument that "_____ has cash, they've done well in the past, so they'll be fine in the future" has other case studies however that we can examien to get an idea of potential outcomes. One of the most recent examples of this was Blackberry, who at the time of their peak had several billion in the bank as well and figured they could ride a couple years of burning that while they developed new phones.
it didn't work out for them.
The problem is Apple’s version of innovation anymore is nothing more then to make it smaller and lighter. Their products don’t really do anything very new and exciting anymore.This is a two-prong problem:
1. No serious innovation
2. Overpriced products
Apple needs to address both problems.
Tim Cook is the wrong person to lead Apple in to the future. SJ was not an engineer but he was a visionary. Tim Cook is neither an engineer nor a visionary. He is a bean counter, and he has just spilled all of his beans in a major way. There is nothing that he can contribute anymore with his boring stage appearances. Go back to Alabama, Timmy, and get a teaching job at Auburn.
Your train has left the station for headphone jack. However, i totaly agree that apple has shifted focus away from a lot of their products with the argument itd make their core products stronger. Disagree, i havent seen sny fruits of that labor.We I have 4 Mac minis at home, 2 users as servers.
So many bits of OSX server has been deprecated that its no longer an option for me. Sure I can add them back on myself and config them using command line tools, but the whole point of OSX server was that I did not have to. And now that I have to I may as well do ALL of it that way, so my next machine will be an Intel NUC.
So now Apple has me moving away from OSX to Linux, so I may as well swap my laptop over too.
Do you see the trend here ?
I have owned over 20 Macs over the years, but I am slowly but surely disengaging.
Software I have bought recently has Linux versions and I can transfer my licence across.
I have $70 sitting in iTunes/App Store for over 2 years, there was nothing I wanted to buy. I had bought 100% of the Apps on my iPhone using my Mac to browse, I can not do that anymore, so I don't bother.
I want a headphone socket, mine gets used daily.
My iPhone is an SE, I don't want anything bigger, so Apple does not make a phone for me anymore. When it is no longer working/repairable I will probably end up being an Android user.
Do you see the growing tend here now ?
I have just bought 50 iMacs for our teaching lab , my mission over the next 3 years is to see if we can do it all with Intel NUCs running a mixture of Linux and Windows.
I do the IT support for my family, they too will get moved over the Linux
NOW do you see the growing trend ?, it snowballs.
I want more value for money, not cheaper products. I would rather they gave an extra warranty of all of its product than lower its price by $100.
What I don't understand is why Apple needs an All Hand meeting for a 5% revenue miss?
Alternatively they could reduce the price of their product lines to increase sales. It would still be a premium brand if they dropped prices by $100 or so!
Having said that, I wish I was concerned over only $84 billion revenue in a single quarter![]()
I can appreciate your personal circumstances and if I were in your position may also follow a similar path, however in the scheme of things your usecase scenario, albeit of no lesser relevance or importance than anyone else’s, is unfortunately a minority market. And market forces tend to dictate product releases.Well I have 4 Mac minis at home, 2 used as servers, one drives my Logic Analyser and the other links into my Arduino gear.
So many bits of OSX server has been deprecated that its no longer an option for me. Sure I can add them back in myself and config them using command line tools, but the whole point of OSX server was that I did not have to do it the hard way. And now that I have to I may as well do ALL of it that way, so my next machine will be an Intel NUC, the more I use Linux the better I will get at it.
So now Apple has me moving away from OSX to Linux, so I may as well swap my laptop over too.
Do you see the trend here ?
I have owned over 20 Macs over the years, but I am slowly but surely disengaging.
Software I have bought recently has Linux versions and I can transfer my licence across.
I have $70 sitting in iTunes/App Store for over 2 years, there was nothing I wanted to buy. I had bought 100% of the Apps on my iPhone using my Mac to browse, I can not do that anymore, so I don't bother.
I want a headphone socket, mine gets used daily.
My iPhone is an SE, I don't want anything bigger, so Apple does not make a phone for me anymore. When it is no longer working/repairable I will probably end up being an Android user.
Do you see the growing tend here now ?
I have just bought 50 iMacs for our teaching lab , my mission over the next 3 years is to see if we can do it all with Intel NUCs running a mixture of Linux and Windows.
I do the IT support for my family, they too will get moved over the Linux
NOW do you see the growing trend ?, it snowballs.
Unpopular opinion, but if we are indeed seeing signs of economic slowdown in China and a maturing smartphone market, issues like pricing or lack of headphone dongles are really inconsequential. Not that including a free fast charger or headphone jack adaptor would be bad, but this isn’t the reason why iPhone sales are in a slump, and doing those things you mentioned still wouldn’t revitalise sales in any meaningful way.
And personally, I maintain that the sheer level of pessimism facing iPhone everywhere (the press, forums) is over exaggerated.
Nevertheless, I feel the right move would likely be to accelerate development of wearables and move beyond the iPhone. As for pricing of the iPhone, increase the price, cut it, leave it the same....i doubt it will make much of a difference with regards to sales. So in this regard, raising iPhone pricing was absolutely still the right thing to do from Apple’s perspective.
Unpopular opinion, but if we are indeed seeing signs of economic slowdown in China and a maturing smartphone market, issues like pricing or lack of headphone dongles are really inconsequential.
Actually I said I had investigated it. And from the evidence I saw stock buy backs are bad for companies. They are good in the short term for stock prices and that is all they are good for. Whenever you decrease supply for something the price increases ceteris paribus.
But, I’d be interested to know why you think they are good for a company.