You forgot a 1
$199
$199? Ikea sells a compatible charging mat for $13, (or $60 for a triple charger). There is no way Apple will charge $199.
It's going to be $399 minimum.
You forgot a 1
$199
Lol, I hope it’s meant sarcasticallyI don’t know why Jobs picked Cook, I think Phil Schiller was a better candidate.
Those are Amazing doe ♂️Tim “What’s in the Pipeline Is Amazing” Cook.
He was saying the same stuff back in 2012-2013 and all we got were the Apple Watch, HomePod, AirPods, and some incremental improvements to iOS products.
Apple grew into the behemoth it is today against all odds and did so through incredible market foresight and meticulous product design.
Toxic as in literally poisonous and life-threatening? Or toxic as in someone calling a fat feminist a fat feminist?As soon as I saw this article, I knew the majority f comments would be toxic. Macrumors comments have not disappointed.
iPod and iPhone
That was it.. (the latter mostly)
Both products with explosions in growth and a change of lifestyle (smartphones becoming the main computing device for the whole world) that we may never see again in our lifetimes, the iPhone in particular.
The Watch isn't close to something like that - their great accessories are just that (accessories) - their services, which is their main thing now moving forward, are only "ok" and several of them are far behind the services they compete with.
Apple's not going away anytime soon - but...it's looking different moving forward.
If we're talking about past Apple products then I disagree. Apple was producing industry changing products that while not on the level of iPhone sales altered the course of the PC industry and put them on a path for a future full of innovation. Mac laptops had forward thinking design going back to the Power PC days. When they released the original Macbook Air it caught the whole PC industry off guard. There was nothing even remotely similar in terms of design and portability and it took years before even a close competitor showed up. OSx was king of stability and provided a clean mostly error free user experience that justified spending more money for. I keep watching Apple hoping they will return to designing products for customers before investors but alas, I still wait.
Free markets are not a panacea, and by the time that happens google and FB has already profiled and sold you multiple times.I think the free market should take care of FB and Google. Inform people what is happening. If they are too apathetic or ignorant to care, they will get what they deserve.
Tim calling for government intervention is akin to asking the fox to keep watch over the chickens, so that nothing bad happens to them.
Tim “What’s in the Pipeline Is Amazing” Cook.
He was saying the same stuff back in 2012-2013 and all we got were the Apple Watch, HomePod, AirPods, and some incremental improvements to iOS products.
Tim has more money than everyone in this thread combined. Yup, he’s the idiot.
Apple grew into the behemoth it is today against all odds and did so through incredible market foresight and meticulous product design. Those qualities didn't come about because Apple had a great corporate structure, they came about because they had a visionary as a leader. Tim Cook as done more for Apples shareholders than he's ever done for Apple fans. He did this by taking the customer devotion Steve Jobs cultivated over many years and cashing it in for maximum profit. Apple may not be doomed anytime soon but it has become a company that instead of innovation now offers a status symbol. The worst for me is that they pretend to be privacy conscious when they too make money from ad revenue. As the overall phone market declines and Apple shifts to services to make up for lost revenue you can bet Apple will not loose out on $$$. See the below article for just one example. I miss the old Apple.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/1/17418664/apple-ad-sales-app-target-smartphone
That’s what I immediately thought as well.
Say it long enough and it may come true.
[doublepost=1551565930][/doublepost]
Lol.
Proves no relationship between money and talent.
Unfortunately you don't understand how buy backs work and how they benefit shareholders. Might be time to read up on it.