Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This not a transfer of wealth, it is a transfer of company ownership. He can’t and won’t sell one share for a long, long time.

Still, his boyfriend must be starting to feel a little intimidated.
He can sell those vested shares immediately and likely he did sell at least some of them yesterday and perhaps today. He typically sells newly vested shares right away, while still holding on to a large number he already had. We'll know soon enough when he makes a SEC filing, but the last time he got the annual shares plus the big block of 5-year shares (like he did this time) he sold the annual shares and held the block of 5-year shares. That is to say, he sold the annual shares remaining after tax withholding and held onto the 5-year shares remaining after tax withholding.
 
oh absolutely. i do think there should be some more progressive legislation around taxing extreme wealth. Taxing equity is not as simple as most people think, though. I think a lot of folks hear "Tim Cook to receive $750m worth of apple stock" and assume we can tax it like it's ordinary income, which it's not. Not to say that it couldn't be done but it's gonna take work (and willing congresspeople) to figure it out.

One really interesting read about extreme wealth is this guy's page on wealth shown to scale.
This $750 million in equity compensation is taxed as ordinary income. For income tax purposes, the situation is the same as it would be if Apple had written him a check on Tuesday for $754 million as an annual salary. That's true whether he holds the shares or not; the value at vesting is treated as ordinary income. If he holds the shares after that time, then gains or loses from that value are treated as capital gains or losses.
 
Well, this is a message for those who constantly argue that Apple products are not overpriced (30% fee in App Store is well deserved because of blah-blah etc.). It's up to Apple to decide what to do with their money but the customers should be aware what they are paying for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aidler
I don't think paying one man such an insane sum of money is ever deserved.

being CEO of a multi trillion dollar company is a daunting task. compensation is subjective, but i think $750m is fair. if anything, being president would probably be one of the few jobs that is more difficult, and therefore i think the president's salary is a bit low in comparison.
 
being CEO of a multi trillion dollar company is a daunting task. compensation is subjective, but i think $750m is fair. if anything, being president would probably be one of the few jobs that is more difficult, and therefore i think the president's salary is a bit low in comparison.

Being a minimum wage worker with a family to support is at least 10 times more daunting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aidler
I wish I made enough to consider donating or giving some of it away. But on the bright side I don't have to worry about anyone hitting me up for money or the headaches that come with a job like his.
 
RIP OFF!
Steve Jobs worked for a whole lot less and ran the company so much better.
Steve Jobs was reported to be taking as little as $1 a year salary. He was compensated in Stock.




When Jobs sold NeXT to Apple in 1997, he received 1.5 million Apple shares. But he sold them to protest the company's appointment of Gil Amelio as CEO only a few months later. Plus, from 1997 to 2011, Jobs made an annual salary of just $1 at Apple.
In your humble opinion of course. :apple:
 
Well, this is a message for those who constantly argue that Apple products are not overpriced (30% fee in App Store is well deserved because of blah-blah etc.). It's up to Apple to decide what to do with their money but the customers should be aware what they are paying for.
Really? Do you go into a grocery store and buy a box or Oreo cookies and do a financial analysis on the CEO of Nabisco? Or buy a car and do a financial analysis of the CEO of the dealership. What customers are paying for is the product they received in exchange for the selling price. That's the only value equation that matters. Those who buy products based on the company philosophies, CEO pay, company politics are welcome to use those views...but in the case of Apple they won't be missing the sale.
 
I support Cook as CEO but I have to disagree. I don't think paying one man such an insane sum of money is ever deserved.
Couldn't agree more. $14.7 million a year and now $750 million in stock? That's insane, and far more money than anyone could ever truly use.

Meanwhile, Japanese CEOs...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2021-08-26 111434.png
    Screenshot 2021-08-26 111434.png
    28.5 KB · Views: 66
  • Like
Reactions: aidler
RIP OFF!
Steve Jobs worked for a whole lot less and ran the company so much better.
Steve Jobs was reported to be taking as little as $1 a year salary. He was compensated in Stock.




When Jobs sold NeXT to Apple in 1997, he received 1.5 million Apple shares. But he sold them to protest the company's appointment of Gil Amelio as CEO only a few months later. Plus, from 1997 to 2011, Jobs made an annual salary of just $1 at Apple.
Mr. Jobs, as Apple's CEO, received an RSU grant in 2003. When the Apple shares from that grant vested in 2006 they were worth around $650 million.
 
Being a minimum wage worker with a family to support is at least 10 times more daunting.
Both have different types of stress. Tim lives and breathes for Apple. Apple became a multi-trillion dollar company under his reign and predecessors, and as such, he will be compensated for that.

One cannot say one is more stressful than the other if you haven’t lived each other’s lives. He doesn’t necessarily live and sit at Apple doing nothing all day. His job isn’t a 9-5 either.
 
Last edited:
Couldn't agree more. $14.7 million a year and now $750 million in stock? That's insane, and far more money than anyone could ever truly use.

Meanwhile, Japanese CEOs...
I don’t understand what your point is with the Japanese CEOs. Apple has generated more income and has more money to pay its executives. As Apple grew, of course their salary went up. If a Japanese CEO led their company to be one of the richest companies in the world, I’m sure they’ll be compensated — unless I’m completely missing an economic, labour law or something pertaining to Japanese salaries here.
 
I support Cook as CEO but I have to disagree. I don't think paying one man such an insane sum of money is ever deserved. I'm glad he plans to give most away though. He's certainly doing much better than other wealthy CEOs in that regard.

He also gives $5 million worth of stock to charities every year.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Scotticus
disagree

there is no moral/ethical reason why anyone should be given that obscene amount of wealth

Sure there is. He earned it by bringing Apple the massive success it enjoys today.

You are not the arbiter of what the proper amount of compensation is for other people.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Scotticus
disagreed. CEO of a multitrillion dollar company means you're responsible for hundreds of thousands of paying jobs which affect hundreds of thousands of families.

It’s not like if Tim calls in sick then Apple closes all its factories and stores around the world. Get a grip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scotticus
Both have different types of stress. Tim lives and breathes for Apple. Apple became a multi-trillion dollar company under his reign and predecessors, and as such, he will be compensated for that.

One cannot say one is more stressful than the other if you haven’t lived each other’s lives. He doesn’t necessarily live and sit at Apple doing nothing all day. His job isn’t a 9-5 either.

Yeah I’m sure Tim regularly wakes up in the night screaming “why can’t I be on minimum wage and worrying how to feed and clothe my children!!!!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scotticus
disagree

there is no moral/ethical reason why anyone should be given that obscene amount of wealth
What do ethics/morality have to do with it?

What are the ethics/morality of nosing up someone else’s income?

Kinda just seems like garden variety envy/greed/hate, which never did nothing good for nobody.

Tim Cook should enjoy his earnings however he sees fit, and I think he should start by throwing himself one hell of a retirement party and for the 3-4 layers down of recent middle management hires.
 
Yeah I’m sure Tim regularly wakes up in the night screaming “why can’t I be on minimum wage and worrying how to feed and clothe my children!!!!”
The fact that one job is more desirable than the other doesn't mean that the most desirable job is less stressful. Presidents desire their job and plan for it for years, but their stress level is usually something that very few people can even understand.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.