He is a different spirit, fortunately.As a sideline, Tim could probably fund his own space programme.
He is a different spirit, fortunately.As a sideline, Tim could probably fund his own space programme.
There are very different perspectives and social backgrounds from which very different personal goals emerge. That's what makes people so interesting. There are then crazy people who shoot satellites into space and others who perhaps want to make the world a little better. And those who have nothing left do neither, as most do.He’s gay, so he can’t possibly have biological children. Sizeable inheritance otherwise for his kids.
I would’ve lost the motivation to work if I have more than enough money for me to blow through in my lifetime and no children to inherit my legacy. At some point in wealth accumulation, family, kids, health and security matters more than making more money.
Agreed. I believe people should be rewarded for their talents but at some point, it's out of control. Corporations reward their top executives too much while most of their employees don't get a fair wage. Not necessarily saying this is Apple's case but the majority of corporations are based on insane amounts of greed coming from the top.That’s a grotesque amount of money for one person to have.
Coincidence?Same day as speculation that the cost of the iPhone 13 will be higher this year!
"Just happens to be..." You just undermined your own argument there...You're ascribing to chance what you're also saying is only because of his hard work. No one is arguing that he doesn't "work hard."All I'm saying is no one can say with a straight face that he didn't earn it, regardless of how the numbers were arrived at. He's a hard working CEO just like many others - just happens to be at the helm of an incredibly valuable company.
No. I go to a grocery store and compare products on price and merits. And I know that the overpriced products have a high ECO salary in their BOM (or some other crap). And we know that Apple products, while generally good, are either priced higher than similarly spec-ed products from other companies or cost much more. One way Apple tries to hide it is they usually come up with configurations/feature sets that have no direct analogs in other products. Very often unique features are useless but they are there to complicate price comparisons.Really? Do you go into a grocery store and buy a box or Oreo cookies and do a financial analysis on the CEO of Nabisco? Or buy a car and do a financial analysis of the CEO of the dealership. What customers are paying for is the product they received in exchange for the selling price. That's the only value equation that matters. Those who buy products based on the company philosophies, CEO pay, company politics are welcome to use those views...but in the case of Apple they won't be missing the sale.
"Just happens to be..." You just undermined your own argument there...You're ascribing to chance what you're also saying is only because of his hard work. No one is arguing that he doesn't "work hard."
I can't really disagree. I remember when Apple was scrappy and had a small Mac marketshare and minimal relevance. SJ got it moving in a positive direction. But TC has taken it into the stratosphere. It can no longer be quite as nimble and scrappy as it once was. The procurement, manufacturing, supply chain and product dev cycle required to be able to have millions of devices available on launch is hard and takes time. It takes detailed & precise planning. Apple, like all companies, can shift if necessary. But it can no longer surprise anyone with the surprise "one more thing." Too many people are watching what Apple does.He's clearly doing his job: earning revenue and returning value to shareholders.
I just don't like what Apple has become as a consequence of his excellent execution of that job.
I mean you did just use an example of someone who gained their position through birth…but back to to the point - no I don’t need to admit that he deserves that. I think executive compensation has been divorced from reality. At established companies there’s almost no risk for these execs either. They’ll take in millions even if they fail.I never said it was "only" because of his hard work. And the phrase "just happens to be" is a form of sarcastic understatement which is quite common (e.g. "Who's that lady?! That lady just happens to be the queen of England!") and doesn't indicate luck/chance. As I stated earlier, you can be the hardest working garbage collector in the world, but it's infeasible that you're going to make the same amount of money (or even in the same universe) as the executive head of a multi-trillion dollar tech company.
Mind boggling how much CEO's make.
Engineer: user replaceable or solderedWell deserved.
Good luck with thatI think once they launch the car in 5-10 years, Tim is going to retire. That’s probably the last huge thing he wants to do before retirement.
A lot of the people here are huge, huge, huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge nerds, and if nerds don't understand something, it's people and people's needs.Engineer: user replaceable or soldered
Tim Cook: soldered, every time
Tim Cook: where do I collect my $750M?
Apple was always on this path. Steve may have done *some* things differently, but Apple has essentially always been (at its core) how it is now.He's clearly doing his job: earning revenue and returning value to shareholders.
I just don't like what Apple has become as a consequence of his excellent execution of that job.
Days after celebrating his tenth anniversary at Apple's helm, Tim Cook is poised to receive a whopping $750 million of Apple's stock this week as the final installment of his pay deal with Apple, put in place over a decade ago when he took over the company, Bloomberg reports.
![]()
The installment will consist of 5 million shares of Apple's stock, equating to be around worth $750 million, according to Bloomberg. Last year, Cook received restricted stock units worth up to $114 million, ensuring he'll remain CEO until at least 2025.
Cook, aged 60, has a net worth of roughly $1.5 billion according to Bloomberg's Billionaires Index. Though a billionaire, Cook's compensation for 2020 was among the most modest compared to other high-paid tech CEOs. In 2020, Cook received $14.7 million, according to SEC filings.
The CEO has said in the past he donates a portion of his salary and compensation to charitable organizations and plans to give most of his wealth away.
Article Link: Tim Cook to Receive $750 Million Worth of Apple's Stock This We
if he lived to 100 he would have to spend 18 million USD each year for those shares alone. Tax the rich!
Days after celebrating his tenth anniversary at Apple's helm, Tim Cook is poised to receive a whopping $750 million of Apple's stock this week as the final installment of his pay deal with Apple, put in place over a decade ago when he took over the company, Bloomberg reports.
![]()
The installment will consist of 5 million shares of Apple's stock, equating to be around worth $750 million, according to Bloomberg. Last year, Cook received restricted stock units worth up to $114 million, ensuring he'll remain CEO until at least 2025.
Cook, aged 60, has a net worth of roughly $1.5 billion according to Bloomberg's Billionaires Index. Though a billionaire, Cook's compensation for 2020 was among the most modest compared to other high-paid tech CEOs. In 2020, Cook received $14.7 million, according to SEC filings.
The CEO has said in the past he donates a portion of his salary and compensation to charitable organizations and plans to give most of his wealth away.
Article Link: Tim Cook to Receive $750 Million Worth of Apple's Stock This Week